Literature DB >> 28597988

Estimating apparent maximum muscle stress of trunk extensor muscles in older adults using subject-specific musculoskeletal models.

Katelyn A Burkhart1,2, Alexander G Bruno1,2, Mary L Bouxsein1,2,3, Jonathan F Bean4,5,6, Dennis E Anderson2,3.   

Abstract

Maximum muscle stress (MMS) is a critical parameter in musculoskeletal modeling, defining the maximum force that a muscle of given size can produce. However, a wide range of MMS values have been reported in literature, and few studies have estimated MMS in trunk muscles. Due to widespread use of musculoskeletal models in studies of the spine and trunk, there is a need to determine reasonable magnitude and range of trunk MMS. We measured trunk extension strength in 49 participants over 65 years of age, surveyed participants about low back pain, and acquired quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans of their lumbar spines. Trunk muscle morphology was assessed from QCT scans and used to create a subject-specific musculoskeletal model for each participant. Model-predicted extension strength was computed using a trunk muscle MMS of 100 N/cm2 . The MMS of each subject-specific model was then adjusted until the measured strength matched the model-predicted strength (±20 N). We found that measured trunk extension strength was significantly higher in men. With the initial constant MMS value, the musculoskeletal model generally over-predicted trunk extension strength. By adjusting MMS on a subject-specific basis, we found apparent MMS values ranging from 40 to 130 N/cm2 , with an average of 75.5 N/cm2 for both men and women. Subjects with low back pain had lower apparent MMS than subjects with no back pain. This work incorporates a unique approach to estimate subject-specific trunk MMS values via musculoskeletal modeling and provides a useful insight into MMS variation.
© 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:498-505, 2018. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  low back pain; maximum muscle stress; thoracolumbar spine model; trunk extension strength

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28597988      PMCID: PMC5723244          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  54 in total

1.  CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  L A Danneels; G G Vanderstraeten; D C Cambier; E E Witvrouw; H J De Cuyper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Tim V Wrigley; Jaap H van Dieën; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Assessment of Isometric Trunk Strength - The Relevance of Body Position and Relationship between Planes of Movement.

Authors:  Andrej Kocjan; Nejc Sarabon
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Subject-specific biomechanics of trunk: musculoskeletal scaling, internal loads and intradiscal pressure estimation.

Authors:  F Ghezelbash; A Shirazi-Adl; N Arjmand; Z El-Ouaaid; A Plamondon
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-05-12

5.  Measurement of muscle strength of the trunk and the lower extremities in subjects with history of low back pain.

Authors:  J H Lee; Y Ooi; K Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Specific strength and voluntary muscle activation in young and elderly women and men.

Authors:  J A Kent-Braun; A V Ng
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-07

7.  The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study.

Authors:  Bret H Goodpaster; Seok Won Park; Tamara B Harris; Steven B Kritchevsky; Michael Nevitt; Ann V Schwartz; Eleanor M Simonsick; Frances A Tylavsky; Marjolein Visser; Anne B Newman
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Thoracic kyphosis affects spinal loads and trunk muscle force.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Jaap H van Dieën; Tim V Wrigley; Alison M Greig; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-05

9.  Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Sinaki; E Itoi; H W Wahner; P Wollan; R Gelzcer; B P Mullan; D A Collins; S F Hodgson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The effect of thoracic kyphosis and sagittal plane alignment on vertebral compressive loading.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Dennis E Anderson; John D'Agostino; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  4 in total

1.  Musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.

Authors:  Stefan Schmid; Katelyn A Burkhart; Brett T Allaire; Daniel Grindle; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Comparison of kinematic parameters of children gait obtained by inverse and direct models.

Authors:  Jurgita Ziziene; Kristina Daunoraviciene; Giedre Juskeniene; Juozas Raistenskis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Biomechanical Properties of Paraspinal Muscles Influence Spinal Loading-A Musculoskeletal Simulation Study.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; C Antonio Sanchez; Stephen H M Brown; John Street; Sidney Fels; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-02

4.  Estimating total maximum isometric force output of trunk and hip muscles after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Akhil Bheemreddy; Aidan Friederich; Lisa Lombardo; Ronald J Triolo; Musa L Audu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.