Literature DB >> 24786740

Live birth is the correct outcome for clinical trials evaluating therapy for the infertile couple.

Kurt T Barnhart1.   

Abstract

Well-designed and -conducted clinical trials are needed to further advance the field for reproductive medicine. However, current reporting of outcomes of trials is ambiguous and disparate. In this review it is offered that the preferred outcome for clinical trials in reproductive medicine should be live birth. Multiple births should be listed, and it should be specified whether this is multiple births per couple or multiple births per conception. The unit of measure should be women (or couples) and not cycles. The duration of exposure should also be clearly identified (i.e., treatment was one cycle, a prespecified number of cycles, or a period of time). Pregnancy loss should be specified, and the denominator should be those who conceived. Although live birth is the primary outcome, complications should be defined and reported, including multiple births and other objective markers, such as preterm delivery, small-for-gestational age, or stillbirth.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infertility; clinical trial; live birth; outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24786740      PMCID: PMC4040520          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

1.  Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Christos Coutifaris; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Gaps in the evidence for fertility treatment-an analysis of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group database.

Authors:  N P Johnson; M Proctor; C M Farquhar
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Barriers to conducting clinical research in reproductive medicine around the world.

Authors:  William D Schlaff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Measuring outcomes in fertility trials: can we rely on clinical pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Jane F Clarke; Minouche M E van Rumste; Cindy M Farquhar; Neil P Johnson; Ben W J Mol; Peter Herbison
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Cumulative birth rates with linked assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Avi Lederman; William Gibbons; Glenn L Schattman; Rogerio A Lobo; Richard E Leach; Judy E Stern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Trends and correlates of good perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Nikhil Joshi; Dmitry Kissin; John E Anderson; Donna Session; Maurizio Macaluso; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Incomplete and inconsistent reporting of maternal and fetal outcomes in infertility treatment trials.

Authors:  Lisa Dapuzzo; Faith E Seitz; William C Dodson; Christina Stetter; Allen R Kunselman; Richard S Legro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcome.

Authors:  Kurt Barnhart; Norah M van Mello; Tom Bourne; Emma Kirk; Ben Van Calster; Cecilia Bottomley; Karine Chung; George Condous; Steven Goldstein; Petra J Hajenius; Ben Willem Mol; Thomas Molinaro; Katherine L O'Flynn O'Brien; Richard Husicka; Mary Sammel; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Shilpi Pandey; Ashalatha Shetty; Mark Hamilton; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Perinatal morbidity after in vitro fertilization is lower with frozen embryo transfer.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Lauren Milman; Clarisa R Gracia; Christos Coutifaris; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  17 in total

1.  Collection of pregnancy outcome records following infertility-challenges and possible solutions.

Authors:  Erin G Floyd; Frauke von Versen-Höynck; Jing Liu; Yueh-Yun Chi; Raquel R Fleischmann; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Single best euploid versus single best unknown-ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Gonul Didem Akay Yoruk; Nevrah Nal Candurmaz; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Bich Ngoc Bui; Sarah F Lensen; Ahmed Gibreel; Wellington P Martins; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-24

4.  Preconceptional antithyroid peroxidase antibodies, but not thyroid-stimulating hormone, are associated with decreased live birth rates in infertile women.

Authors:  Aimee Seungdamrong; Anne Z Steiner; Clarisa R Gracia; Richard S Legro; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; William D Schlaff; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Randal D Robinson; Hao Huang; Ruben Alvero; Karl R Hansen; Susan Jin; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang; Nanette Santoro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Investigating the Optimal Time for Intrauterine Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Infusion in Order to Improve IVF Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Petroula Tsioulou; Polina Giannelou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Agni Pantou; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Christopoulos; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Bich Ngoc Bui; Sarah F Lensen; Ahmed Gibreel; Wellington P Martins; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  Prevalence of a Good Perinatal Outcome With Cryopreserved Compared With Fresh Donor Oocytes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Eaton; Tracy Truong; Yi-Ju Li; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.623

9.  Cost-effectiveness of medically assisted reproduction or expectant management for unexplained subfertility: when to start treatment?

Authors:  R van Eekelen; M J Eijkemans; M Mochtar; F Mol; B W Mol; H Groen; M van Wely
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  National Survey Highlights the Urgent Need for Standardisation of Embryo Transfer Techniques in the UK.

Authors:  Lewis Nancarrow; Nicola Tempest; Andrew J Drakeley; Roy Homburg; Richard Russell; Dharani K Hapangama
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.