Literature DB >> 20947073

Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcome.

Kurt Barnhart1, Norah M van Mello, Tom Bourne, Emma Kirk, Ben Van Calster, Cecilia Bottomley, Karine Chung, George Condous, Steven Goldstein, Petra J Hajenius, Ben Willem Mol, Thomas Molinaro, Katherine L O'Flynn O'Brien, Richard Husicka, Mary Sammel, Dirk Timmerman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve the interpretation of future studies in women who are initially diagnosed with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL), we propose a consensus statement with definitions of population, target disease, and final outcome.
DESIGN: A review of literature and a series of collaborative international meetings were used to develop a consensus for definitions and final outcomes of women initially diagnosed with a PUL. RESULT(S): Global differences were noted in populations studied and in the definitions of outcomes. We propose to define initial ultrasound classification of findings into five categories: definite ectopic pregnancy (EP), probable EP, PUL, probable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), and definite IUP. Patients with a PUL should be followed and final outcomes should be categorized as visualized EP, visualized IUP, spontaneously resolved PUL, and persisting PUL. Those with the transient condition of a persisting PUL should ultimately be classified as nonvisualized EP, treated persistent PUL, resolved persistent PUL, or histologic IUP. These specific categories can be used to characterize the natural history or location (intrauterine vs. extrauterine) of any early gestation where the initial location is unknown. CONCLUSION(S): Careful definition of populations and classification of outcomes should optimize objective interpretation of research, allow objective assessment of future reproductive prognosis, and hopefully lead to improved clinical care of women initially identified to have a PUL.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20947073      PMCID: PMC3032825          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  49 in total

Review 1.  Catch me if you scan: ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  D Jurkovic; D Mavrelos
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Enough is enough! Time for a new model of care for women with early pregnancy complications.

Authors:  George Condous
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.100

3.  Prediction of outcome in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancy: focus on intrauterine rather than ectopic gestation.

Authors:  Bruno C Casanova; Mary D Sammel; Jesse Chittams; Kelly Timbers; Jennifer L Kulp; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 94: Medical management of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Use of serum progesterone measurements to reduce need for follow-up in women with pregnancies of unknown location.

Authors:  A Day; E Sawyer; D Mavrelos; A Tailor; S Helmy; D Jurkovic
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Clinical information does not improve the performance of mathematical models in predicting the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location.

Authors:  George Condous; Ben Van Calster; Emma Kirk; Zara Haider; Dirk Timmerman; Sabine Van Huffel; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  The role of single serum progesterone measurement in conjunction with beta hCG in the management of suspected ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  G El Bishry; S Ganta
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Prediction of location of a symptomatic early gestation based solely on clinical presentation.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Bruno Casanova; Mary D Sammel; Kelly Timbers; Karine Chung; J L Kulp
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Change in quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin after manual vacuum aspiration in women with pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Veronica Rivera; Phuong H Nguyen; Anita Sit
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The METEX study: methotrexate versus expectant management in women with ectopic pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Norah M van Mello; Femke Mol; Albert H Adriaanse; Erik A Boss; Antonius B Dijkman; Johannes Pr Doornbos; Mark Hans Emanuel; Jaap Friederich; Loes van der Leeuw-Harmsen; Jos P Lips; Evert Jp van Santbrink; Harold R Verhoeve; Harry Visser; Willem M Ankum; Fulco van der Veen; Ben W Mol; Petra J Hajenius
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  45 in total

1.  The clinical performance of the M4 decision support model to triage women with a pregnancy of unknown location as at low or high risk of complications.

Authors:  S Bobdiwala; S Guha; B Van Calster; F Ayim; N Mitchell-Jones; M Al-Memar; H Mitchell; C Stalder; C Bottomley; A Kothari; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  [Histopathology and clinical aspects of extrauterine pregnancy].

Authors:  L-C Horn; S Opitz; R Handzel; C E Brambs
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 3.  Pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Gökhan Boyraz; Gürkan Bozdağ
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-06-01

4.  Predicting first trimester pregnancy outcome: derivation of a multiple marker test.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel; Samantha F Butts; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Ectopic pregnancy prediction in women with a pregnancy of unknown location: data beyond 48 h are necessary.

Authors:  J Zee; M D Sammel; K Chung; P Takacs; T Bourne; K T Barnhart
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Metabolomic identification of novel diagnostic biomarkers in ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Onur Turkoglu; Ayse Citil; Ceren Katar; Ismail Mert; Praveen Kumar; Ali Yilmaz; Dilek S Uygur; Salim Erkaya; Stewart F Graham; Ray O Bahado-Singh
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 7.  Biomarkers for ectopic pregnancy and pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Following declining human chorionic gonadotropin values in pregnancies of unknown location: when is it safe to stop?

Authors:  Katherine E Cameron; Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel; Karine Chung; Peter Takacs; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Validation of a clinical risk scoring system, based solely on clinical presentation, for the management of pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Mary D Sammel; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Christopher B Morse; Katherine O'Flynn O'Brien; Lynne Allen-Taylor; Alka Shaunik
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Differences in Serum Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Rise in Early Pregnancy by Race and Value at Presentation.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Wensheng Guo; Mark S Cary; Christopher B Morse; Karine Chung; Peter Takacs; Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.