OBJECTIVE: To improve the interpretation of future studies in women who are initially diagnosed with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL), we propose a consensus statement with definitions of population, target disease, and final outcome. DESIGN: A review of literature and a series of collaborative international meetings were used to develop a consensus for definitions and final outcomes of women initially diagnosed with a PUL. RESULT(S): Global differences were noted in populations studied and in the definitions of outcomes. We propose to define initial ultrasound classification of findings into five categories: definite ectopic pregnancy (EP), probable EP, PUL, probable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), and definite IUP. Patients with a PUL should be followed and final outcomes should be categorized as visualized EP, visualized IUP, spontaneously resolved PUL, and persisting PUL. Those with the transient condition of a persisting PUL should ultimately be classified as nonvisualized EP, treated persistent PUL, resolved persistent PUL, or histologic IUP. These specific categories can be used to characterize the natural history or location (intrauterine vs. extrauterine) of any early gestation where the initial location is unknown. CONCLUSION(S): Careful definition of populations and classification of outcomes should optimize objective interpretation of research, allow objective assessment of future reproductive prognosis, and hopefully lead to improved clinical care of women initially identified to have a PUL.
OBJECTIVE: To improve the interpretation of future studies in women who are initially diagnosed with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL), we propose a consensus statement with definitions of population, target disease, and final outcome. DESIGN: A review of literature and a series of collaborative international meetings were used to develop a consensus for definitions and final outcomes of women initially diagnosed with a PUL. RESULT(S): Global differences were noted in populations studied and in the definitions of outcomes. We propose to define initial ultrasound classification of findings into five categories: definite ectopic pregnancy (EP), probable EP, PUL, probable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), and definite IUP. Patients with a PUL should be followed and final outcomes should be categorized as visualized EP, visualized IUP, spontaneously resolved PUL, and persisting PUL. Those with the transient condition of a persisting PUL should ultimately be classified as nonvisualized EP, treated persistent PUL, resolved persistent PUL, or histologic IUP. These specific categories can be used to characterize the natural history or location (intrauterine vs. extrauterine) of any early gestation where the initial location is unknown. CONCLUSION(S): Careful definition of populations and classification of outcomes should optimize objective interpretation of research, allow objective assessment of future reproductive prognosis, and hopefully lead to improved clinical care of women initially identified to have a PUL.
Authors: Bruno C Casanova; Mary D Sammel; Jesse Chittams; Kelly Timbers; Jennifer L Kulp; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: George Condous; Ben Van Calster; Emma Kirk; Zara Haider; Dirk Timmerman; Sabine Van Huffel; Tom Bourne Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2007-05-17 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Kurt T Barnhart; Bruno Casanova; Mary D Sammel; Kelly Timbers; Karine Chung; J L Kulp Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Norah M van Mello; Femke Mol; Albert H Adriaanse; Erik A Boss; Antonius B Dijkman; Johannes Pr Doornbos; Mark Hans Emanuel; Jaap Friederich; Loes van der Leeuw-Harmsen; Jos P Lips; Evert Jp van Santbrink; Harold R Verhoeve; Harry Visser; Willem M Ankum; Fulco van der Veen; Ben W Mol; Petra J Hajenius Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2008-06-19 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: S Bobdiwala; S Guha; B Van Calster; F Ayim; N Mitchell-Jones; M Al-Memar; H Mitchell; C Stalder; C Bottomley; A Kothari; D Timmerman; T Bourne Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel; Samantha F Butts; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Katherine E Cameron; Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel; Karine Chung; Peter Takacs; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Kurt T Barnhart; Mary D Sammel; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Christopher B Morse; Katherine O'Flynn O'Brien; Lynne Allen-Taylor; Alka Shaunik Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Kurt T Barnhart; Wensheng Guo; Mark S Cary; Christopher B Morse; Karine Chung; Peter Takacs; Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 7.661