Literature DB >> 24771900

Evaluation of Newly Adapted Clip Marker System in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Suspicion of Breast Cancer.

R Schulz-Wendtland1, P Dankerl1, G Dilbat2, M Bani3, P A Fasching3, K Heusinger3, M P Lux3, C R Loehberg3, S M Jud3, C Rauh3, C M Bayer3, M W Beckmann3, M Uder4, M Meier-Meitinger1, B Brehm1.   

Abstract

Introduction: A newly adapted clip system for intramammary marking during ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for suspicion of breast cancer is described and evaluated here. Material and Method: Fifty patients with suspicion of breast cancer (cT2) had ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy using a newly adapted clip marker system (HistoCore™ and O-Twist Marker™). Subsequently, ultrasound follow-up and tomosynthesis scans were done to determine the location of the marker clips.
Results: No dislocation of the marker clip was detected on ultrasound in 45 of 50 patients (90 %), and 5 patients (10 %) had a maximum dislocation of 5 mm along the x-, y- or z-axis. Tomosynthesis scans demonstrated precise placement without dislocation of the clip markers in 48 patients (96 %); 2 patients (4 %) had a maximum dislocation of 3 mm along the x-, y- or z-axis.
Conclusion: The newly developed clip marker system, a combination of a single-use breast biopsy needle and a precise, length-adapted intramammary marker clip, represents a further improvement in oncological therapy. This is of particular importance for patients requiring subsequent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as in cases with complete tumour remission, there is no target point for preoperative, ultrasound-guided wire marking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; breast; breast cancer; ultrasound

Year:  2013        PMID: 24771900      PMCID: PMC3862042          DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1351086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  20 in total

1.  Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. EUSOMA Working Party.

Authors:  N M Perry
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  [O-twist marker for post-interventional marking in imaging of suspected breast lesions].

Authors:  H Sittek; N Heske; M Kessler; S Britsch; C Vick; M Untch; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  L Liberman; T L Feng; D D Dershaw; E A Morris; A F Abramson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The evolving practice pattern of the breast surgeon with disappearance of open biopsy for nonpalpable lesions.

Authors:  V J Zannis; K M Aliano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Breast Cancer Risk - Genes, Environment and Clinics.

Authors:  P A Fasching; A B Ekici; B R Adamietz; D L Wachter; A Hein; C M Bayer; L Häberle; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; K Heusinger; M Rübner; C Rauh; M R Bani; M P Lux; R Schulz-Wendtland; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology, Specimen Radiography System (SRS) and Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Can Optimise Surgical Therapy?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; B Brehm; M Hammon; M Saake; P Dankerl; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  [Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous core needle breast biopsy (CNBB) versus open surgical biopsy (OSB) of nonpalpable breast lesions: metaanalysis and cost evaluation for German-speaking countries].

Authors:  R Gruber; R Bernt; T H Helbich
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2007-12-05

Review 9.  Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures.

Authors:  Matthew Wallis; Anne Tardivon; Anne Tarvidon; Thomas Helbich; Ingrid Schreer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  R M Pijnappel; M van den Donk; R Holland; W P Th M Mali; J L Peterse; J H C L Hendriks; P H M Peeters
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Sonography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Locate Intramammary Marker Clips.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; D L Wachter; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger; B Brehm
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Evaluation of a Marker Clip System in Sonographically Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Cancer Localization Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; M R Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M G Schrauder; M W Beckmann; M Uder; B Brehm; C R Loehberg
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Evaluation of a Wireless Localization System for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions - Feasibility and Cost-effectiveness in Everyday Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Patrik Pöschke; Julius Emons; Felix Heindl; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Sebastian Jud; Ramona Erber; Carolin C Hack; Caroline Preuss; Annika Behrens
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Subsequent Marking under Ultrasound Guidance of Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Areas after Receipt of Histology: A Feasibility Study of a New Technique.

Authors:  Clara Park; Frauke Chevalier; Volker Möbus; Petra Hoedl; Kerstin Engelmann; Stephan Falk; Doris Leithner; Benjamin Kaltenbach; Thomas J Vogl; Markus Müller-Schimpfle
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Analysis of Oncological Second Opinions in a Certified University Breast and Gynecological Cancer Center Regarding Consensus between the First and Second Opinion and Conformity with the Guidelines.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Sonja Wasner; Julia Meyer; Lothar Häberle; Carolin C Hack; Sebastian Jud; Alexander Hein; Marius Wunderle; Julius Emons; Paul Gass; Peter A Fasching; Sainab Egloffstein; Jessica Krebs; Yesim Erim; Matthias W Beckmann; Christian R Loehberg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.268

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.