Literature DB >> 24771895

Biological Matrices and Synthetic Meshes Used in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction - a Review of Products Available in Germany.

M Dieterich1, A Faridi2.   

Abstract

While autologous breast reconstruction was considered the procedure of choice for immediate breast reconstruction, there has been a shift towards implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) in recent years. The proven safety of silicone breast implants and the development of biological matrices and synthetic meshes have contributed to the growing popularity of this approach. Although these different products are widely used, only limited clinical data are available with regard to breast surgery. The aim of this review was to give an overview of available biological matrices and synthetic meshes and discuss their use in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADM; biological matrix; breast cancer; breast reconstruction; synthetic mesh

Year:  2013        PMID: 24771895      PMCID: PMC3862049          DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  41 in total

1.  Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Christopher V Pelletiere
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Olubimpe A Ayeni; Kenneth B Hughes; Bernard T Lee; Sumner A Slavin; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases.

Authors:  Max Dieterich; Stefan Paepke; Karin Zwiefel; Holger Dieterich; Jens Blohmer; Andree Faridi; Evelyn Klein; Bernd Gerber; Carolin Nestle-Kraemling
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Peter B Bach; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Human monocyte activation by biologic and biodegradable meshes in vitro.

Authors:  Sean B Orenstein; Yi Qiao; Manjot Kaur; Ulrike Klueh; Don L Kreutzer; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Early Results Using Sterilized Acellular Human Dermis (Neoform) in Post-Mastectomy Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Albert Losken
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Endara; Duan Chen; Kapil Verma; Maurice Y Nahabedian; Scott L Spear
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Analysis of clinically significant seroma formation in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal grafts.

Authors:  Brett F Michelotti; Sebastian Brooke; John Mesa; Matthew Z Wilson; Kurtis Moyer; Donald R Mackay; Rogerio I Neves; John Potochny
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Evaluation of human acellular dermis versus porcine acellular dermis in an in vivo model for incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Manh-Dan Ngo; Harold M Aberman; Michael L Hawes; Bryan Choi; Arthur A Gertzman
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 1.522

10.  The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery.

Authors:  Hilton Becker; Jeffrey G Lind
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.326

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel S Cabalag; Marie Rostek; George S Miller; Michael P Chae; Tam Quinn; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

Review 2.  Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Mario Marx; Michael Untch; Andree Faridi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  A Head to Head Comparison Between SurgiMend® - Fetal Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix and Tutomesh® - A Bovine Pericardium Collagen Membrane in Breast Reconstruction in 45 Cases.

Authors:  Christian Eichler; Jeria Efremova; Klaus Brunnert; Christian M Kurbacher; Oleg Gluz; Julian Puppe; Mathias Warm
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Patient-Reported Outcomes and Aesthetic Results after Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrices: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Lea Beier; Andree Faridi; Christine Ankel; Barbara Krause-Bergmann; Stefan Paepke; Christine Mau; Maren Keller; Hans Joachim Strittmatter; Maria Margarete Karsten
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (Epiflex®) in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Treatment of Capsular Fibrosis: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study.

Authors:  Lea Beier; Andree Faridi; Corina Neumann; Stefan Paepke; Christine Mau; Maren Keller; Hans Joachim Strittmatter; Claudia Gerber-Schäfer; Lelia Bauer; Maria Margarete Karsten; Sherko Kümmel; Jens-Uwe Blohmer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Alone or in Combination with a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh - A Detailed Analysis of the BREAST-Q and Overview of the Literature.

Authors:  M Dieterich; J Angres; J Stubert; A Stachs; T Reimer; B Gerber
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Clinical Approaches to Breast Reconstruction: What Is the Appropriate Reconstructive Procedure for My Patient?

Authors:  Max Dieterich; Adrian Dragu; Angrit Stachs; Johannes Stubert
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Thoracic Wall Reconstruction in Advanced Breast Tumours.

Authors:  A Daigeler; K Harati; O Goertz; T Hirsch; B Behr; M Lehnhardt; J Kolbenschlag
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Comparisons of Therapeutic and Aesthetic Effects of One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Biological Matrix.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Zhongzhao Wang; Xiangyi Kong; Xiangyu Wang; Yi Fang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  A Head-to-head Comparison between SurgiMend and Epiflex in 127 Breast Reconstructions.

Authors:  Christian Eichler; Nadine Vogt; Klaus Brunnert; Axel Sauerwald; Julian Puppe; Mathias Warm
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.