Literature DB >> 34720805

Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (Epiflex®) in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Treatment of Capsular Fibrosis: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study.

Lea Beier1,2, Andree Faridi3, Corina Neumann4, Stefan Paepke5, Christine Mau6, Maren Keller2, Hans Joachim Strittmatter7, Claudia Gerber-Schäfer8, Lelia Bauer9, Maria Margarete Karsten1, Sherko Kümmel10, Jens-Uwe Blohmer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, the number of acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions (IBBR) has substantially increased. However, there is still a lack of prospective data on complication rates.
METHODS: We performed a non-interventional, multicenter, prospective cohort study to evaluate complication rates of a human ADM in patients undergoing an IBBR after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomies. Patients with primary reconstruction (cohort A) and patients undergoing a secondary reconstruction after capsular fibrosis (cohort B) using the human ADM Epiflex® (DIZG gGmbH, Berlin, Germany) were enrolled in this study. Patients were followed-up for 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Eighty-four eligible patients were included in this study of whom 28 women underwent a bilateral breast reconstruction, leading to 112 human ADM-assisted reconstructions in total (cohort A: 73, cohort B: 39). In 33.0% of the reconstructed breasts at least one of the complications of primary interest occurred, including implant loss 7.1%, seroma 15.2%; infection 5.4%, rash 8.0%, and Baker grade III/IV capsular fibrosis 2.7%, with no statistically significant differences between the cohorts. Previous radiation therapy was significantly associated with occurrence of any postoperative complication (OR 20.41; p value 0.027).
CONCLUSION: The rates of most complications were comparable to the rates reported for other ADMs with relatively low rates of capsular fibrosis and infections. The rate of seroma was increased in our study. Prior radiation therapy increased the risk of any postoperative complications. Therefore, the use of ADM in these patients should be considered carefully.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Capsular fibrosis; Complications; Human acellular dermal matrix

Year:  2020        PMID: 34720805      PMCID: PMC8543307          DOI: 10.1159/000512201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  28 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Goretti Ho; T JoAnna Nguyen; Ahva Shahabi; Brian H Hwang; Linda S Chan; Alex K Wong
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.

Authors:  Michael Sorkin; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Håkan Hallberg; Svanheidur Rafnsdottir; Gennaro Selvaggi; Annika Strandell; Ola Samuelsson; Ida Stadig; Therese Svanberg; Emma Hansson; Richard Lewin
Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2018-01-10

4.  Immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: factors affecting outcome.

Authors:  Alessia M Lardi; Mark Ho-Asjoe; Pari-Naz Mohanna; Jian Farhadi
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Mario Marx; Michael Untch; Andree Faridi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Biologic meshes and synthetic meshes in cancer patients: a double-edged sword: differences in production of IL-6 and IL-12 caused by acellular dermal matrices in human immune cells.

Authors:  Maria Margarete Karsten; Sabine Enders; Julia Knabl; Verena Kirn; Peter Düwell; Brigitte Rack; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Doris Mayr; Darius Dian
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Complication Rates With Human Acellular Dermal Matrices: Retrospective Review of 211 Consecutive Breast Reconstructions.

Authors:  Robert H Schnarrs; Claire M Carman; Chase Tobin; Serena A Chase; Kerri A Rossmeier
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-11-21

8.  Subcutaneous Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix/Mesh: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Jordan D Frey; Mihye Choi; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-11-23

9.  The BREASTrial Stage II: ADM Breast Reconstruction Outcomes from Definitive Reconstruction to 3 Months Postoperative.

Authors:  Shaun D Mendenhall; Layla A Anderson; Jian Ying; Kenneth M Boucher; Leigh A Neumayer; Jayant P Agarwal
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-01-25

10.  The role of postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Pu; Tong-Chun Mao; Yi-Ming Zhang; Shao-Liang Wang; Dong-Li Fan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.