| Literature DB >> 24769234 |
Jatin G Burniston1, Jenna Kenyani2, Donna Gray3, Eleonora Guadagnin4, Ian H Jarman5, James N Cobley6, Daniel J Cuthbertson3, Yi-Wen Chen7, Jonathan M Wastling8, Paulo J Lisboa5, Lauren G Koch9, Steven L Britton9.
Abstract
Profiling of protein species is important because gene polymorphisms, splice variations and post-translational modifications may combine and give rise to multiple protein species that have different effects on cellular function. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis is one of the most robust methods for differential analysis of protein species, but bioinformatic interrogation is challenging because the consequences of changes in the abundance of individual protein species on cell function are unknown and cannot be predicted. We conducted DIGE of soleus muscle from male and female rats artificially selected as either high- or low-capacity runners (HCR and LCR, respectively). In total 696 protein species were resolved and LC-MS/MS identified proteins in 337 spots. Forty protein species were differentially (P<0.05, FDR<10%) expressed between HCR and LCR and conditional independence mapping found distinct networks within these data, which brought insight beyond that achieved by functional annotation. Protein disulphide isomerase A3 emerged as a key node segregating with differences in aerobic capacity and unsupervised bibliometric analysis highlighted further links to signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, which were confirmed by western blotting. Thus, conditional independence mapping is a useful technique for interrogating DIGE data that is capable of highlighting latent features. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Quantitative proteome profiling revealed that there is little or no sexual dimorphism in the skeletal muscle response to artificial selection on running capacity. Instead we found that noncanonical STAT3 signalling may be associated with low exercise capacity and skeletal muscle insulin resistance. Importantly, this discovery was made using unsupervised multivariate association mapping and bibliometric network analyses. This allowed our interpretation of the findings to be guided by patterns within the data rather than our preconceptions about which proteins or processes are of greatest interest. Moreover, we demonstrate that this novel approach can be applied to 2D gel analysis, which is unsurpassed in its ability to profile protein species but currently has few dedicated bioinformatic tools.Entities:
Keywords: Animal Selection Model; Bibliometric network analysis; Mass spectrometry; N-myc down-regulated gene 2; Sexual dimorphism; Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24769234 PMCID: PMC4150023 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.04.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Proteomics ISSN: 1874-3919 Impact factor: 4.044
Physical characteristics of male and female LCR and HCR rats.
| F-LCR | M-LCR | F-HCR | M-HCR | Interaction | Strain | Sex | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distance run (m) | 336.5 ± 52.9 | 252.3 ± 42.7 | 1974.1 ± 108.6 | 1624.5 ± 112.1 | 0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Work (J) | 176.7 ± 30.9 | 219.8 ± 43.9 | 853.1 ± 53.9 | 1019.6 ± 93.7 | 0.0074 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Body weight (g) | 255.4 ± 27.2 | 460.4 ± 40.4 | 203.0 ± 16.7 | 334.4 ± 35.8 | 0.0025 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Soleus weight (mg) | 111.4 ± 12.8 | 157.3 ± 32.5 | 116.3 ± 10.1 | 162.5 ± 23.3 | NS | NS | <0.0001 |
| EDL weight (mg) | 109.5 ± 9.2 | 176.1 ± 17.4 | 107.3 ± 17.6 | 171.3 ± 19.9 | NS | NS | <0.0001 |
| Red gastrocnemius weight (mg) | 521.1 ± 56.2 | 732.9 ± 96.6 | 480.3 ± 80.6 | 600.4 ± 164.2 | NS | 0.0299 | <0.0001 |
| Tibialis anterior weight (mg) | 452.1 ± 50.3 | 693.3 ± 86.9 | 478.0 ± 79.9 | 633.3 ± 105.6 | NS | NS | <0.0001 |
| Heart weight (mg) | 789.4 ± 76.4 | 1229.6 ± 119.7 | 707.9 ± 44.3 | 1090.3 ± 100.1 | NS | 0.0016 | <0.0001 |
Data are displayed as mean ± SD (n = 5, in each group). Two-factor analysis of variance was used to calculate P values and determine statistically significant interactions and main effects for strain (HCR vs LCR) and sex (male vs female). EDL = extensor digitorum longus, F-HCR = female high-capacity runner, M-LCR = male low-capacity runner.
Soleus phenotype of male and female LCR and HCR rats.
| F-LCR | M-LCR | F-HCR | M-HCR | Interaction | Strain | Sex | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of type I fibres (%) | 84 ± 11 | 78 ± 7 | 75 ± 15 | 80 ± 12 | NS | NS | NS |
| Cross sectional area (mm2) | |||||||
| Type I | 2560 ± 290 | 3037 ± 627 | 2674 ± 223 | 3004 ± 510 | NS | NS | 0.0589 |
| Type IIa | 1733 ± 969 | 3318 ± 711 | 1795 ± 367 | 2590 ± 572 | NS | NS | 0.0014 |
| NADH-TETRAZOLIUM reductase (OD) | |||||||
| Type I | 0.158 ± 0.03 | 0.146 ± 0.03 | 0.169 ± 0.01 | 0.192 ± 0.01 | NS | 0.0244 | NS |
| Type IIa | 0.161 ± 0.04 | 0.148 ± 0.04 | 0.187 ± 0.02 | 0.207 ± 0.01 | NS | 0.0059 | NS |
| Periodic acid Schiff's (OD) | |||||||
| Type I | 0.183 ± 0.07 | 0.179 ± 0.02 | 0.177 ± 0.02 | 0.193 ± 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
| Type IIa | 0.187 ± 0.02 | 0.186 ± 0.08 | 0.172 ± 0.03 | 0.197 ± 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
Data are displayed as mean ± SD (n = 5, in each group). Two-factor analysis of variance was used to calculate P values and determine statistically significant interactions and main effects for strain (HCR vs LCR) and sex (male vs female). EDL = extensor digitorum longus, F-HCR = female high-capacity runner, M-LCR = male low-capacity runner.
Sex-specific differences in soleus muscle protein abundance.
| Description | Protein ID | Ref# | F-LCR | M-LCR | F-HCR | M-HCR | Fold |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial | CH60 | 381 | 1.414 ± 0.094 | 0.746 ± 0.116 | 1.440 ± 0.271 | 0.755 ± 0.120 | 1.71 |
| Glutathione S-transferase | GSTA3 | 772 | 1.174 ± 0.156 | 0.918 ± 0.209 | 1.262 ± 0.243 | 0.871 ± 0.192 | 1.44 |
| DESM | 351 | 1.070 ± 0.169 | 0.896 ± 0.095 | 1.174 ± 0.133 | 0.963 ± 0.107 | 1.28 | |
| Carbonic anhydrase 3 | CAH3 | 741 | 0.959 ± 0.089 | 0.803 ± 0.117 | 0.994 ± 0.147 | 0.772 ± 0.110 | 1.24 |
| Carbonic anhydrase 3 | CAH3 | 755 | 0.865 ± 0.067 | 0.749 ± 0.092 | 0.865 ± 0.113 | 0.691 ± 0.110 | 1.15 |
| Superoxide dismutase [Cu–Zn] | SODC | 956 | 1.173 ± 0.067 | 1.064 ± 0.064 | 1.106 ± 0.078 | 0.971 ± 0.072 | 1.13 |
| PGM1 | 199 | 1.031 ± 0.052 | 0.807 ± 0.102 | 0.930 ± 0.043 | 0.873 ± 0.049 | 1.10 | |
| Serine protease inhibitor A3K | SPA3K | 139 | 1.098 ± 0.278 | 1.351 ± 0.141 | 0.735 ± 0.057 | 1.031 ± 0.112 | 1.33 |
| Serine protease inhibitor A3L | SPA3L | 168 | 0.958 ± 0.278 | 1.220 ± 0.210 | 0.747 ± 0.144 | 1.282 ± 0.125 | 1.28 |
| FETUA | 169 | 0.978 ± 0.171 | 1.306 ± 0.166 | 0.882 ± 0.192 | 1.308 ± 0.184 | 1.29 | |
| Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein | HSP7C | 53 | 0.932 ± 0.105 | 1.167 ± 0.160 | 1.155 ± 0.096 | 1.329 ± 0.143 | 1.23 |
| Stress-70 protein, mitochondrial | GRP75 | 170 | 0.815 ± 0.068 | 1.006 ± 0.115 | 0.935 ± 0.069 | 1.038 ± 0.099 | 1.17 |
| Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase | ODP2 | 165 | 0.970 ± 0.043 | 1.138 ± 0.090 | 1.113 ± 0.034 | 1.222 ± 0.065 | 1.12 |
| Beta-enolase | ENOB | 379 | 0.879 ± 0.063 | 1.084 ± 0.104 | 0.870 ± 0.020 | 0.858 ± 0.018 | 1.07 |
| Vimentin | VIME | 260 | 0.941 ± 0.215 | 1.238 ± 0.209 | 0.903 ± 0.140 | 1.209 ± 0.121 | 1.13 |
Protein description and protein ID relate to the Swiss-Prot database entry identified from Mascot searches of CID and ETD MS/MS spectra. Ref# is the gel spot number created during image analysis and is consistent with Fig. 1 and the World-2DPAGE online graphical interface, available at http://world-2dpage.expasy.org/repository/0069/. Relative spot volumes (mean ± SD) are reported for each independent group, i.e. male high-capacity runner (M-HCR), female low-capacity runner (F-LCR) etc. Fold difference values are reported for spots exhibiting significant differences in expression at P < 0.05 at a false discovery rate of <10%.
Contains evidence of post-translational modification: acetylation or phosphorylation (Supplementary Table S1).
HCR/LCR strain-specific differences in soleus muscle protein abundance.
| Description | Protein ID | Ref# | F-LCR | M-LCR | F-HCR | M-HCR | fold |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha | NDUAA | 535 | 0.643 ± 0.292 | 0.721 ± 0.229 | 1.204 ± 0.302 | 1.182 ± 0.045 | −2.06 |
| ATP synthase subunit alpha | ATPA | 338 | 0.956 ± 0.044 | 1.007 ± 0.098 | 1.100 ± 0.062 | 1.132 ± 0.100 | −1.08 |
| ATP synthase subunit alpha | ATPA | 314 | 0.936 ± 0.048 | 0.967 ± 0.080 | 1.154 ± 0.094 | 1.180 ± 0.085 | −1.18 |
| ATPB | 345 | 0.861 ± 0.028 | 0.929 ± 0.059 | 1.043 ± 0.059 | 1.012 ± 0.113 | −1.10 | |
| ATP synthase subunit d | ATP5H | 861 | 1.054 ± 0.052 | 1.134 ± 0.122 | 1.191 ± 0.080 | 1.289 ± 0.107 | −1.04 |
| CH60 | 238 | 1.109 ± 0.112 | 1.047 ± 0.071 | 1.258 ± 0.117 | 1.170 ± 0.044 | −1.10 | |
| GRP75 | 107 | 1.160 ± 0.078 | 1.061 ± 0.027 | 1.237 ± 0.070 | 1.190 ± 0.077 | −1.08 | |
| HSP7C | 53 | 0.932 ± 0.105 | 1.167 ± 0.160 | 1.155 ± 0.096 | 1.329 ± 0.143 | −1.11 | |
| Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit beta | ODPB | 635 | 0.991 ± 0.043 | 1.018 ± 0.055 | 1.132 ± 0.026 | 1.181 ± 0.099 | −1.10 |
| Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase E2 | ODP2 | 165 | 0.970 ± 0.043 | 1.138 ± 0.090 | 1.113 ± 0.034 | 1.222 ± 0.065 | −1.08 |
| Fumarate hydratase | FUMH | 423 | 0.599 ± 0.304 | 0.508 ± 0.198 | 1.458 ± 0.254 | 1.622 ± 0.335 | −3.12 |
| Fumarate hydratase | FUMH | 425 | 0.768 ± 0.121 | 0.822 ± 0.120 | 1.325 ± 0.177 | 1.374 ± 0.0115 | −1.54 |
| Fumarate hydratase | FUMH | 426 | 0.717 ± 0.269 | 0.599 ± 0.163 | 1.471 ± 0.282 | 1.595 ± 0.222 | −2.35 |
| Very long-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase | ACADV | 65 | 0.878 ± 0.173 | 0.866 ± 0.121 | 1.074 ± 0.049 | 1.074 ± 0.071 | −1.32 |
| Enoyl-CoA hydratase | ECHM | 762 | 0.890 ± 0.064 | 0.885 ± 0.078 | 1.158 ± 0.100 | 1.026 ± 0.074 | −1.20 |
| 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase | THTM | 670 | 0.899 ± 0.040 | 0.883 ± 0.047 | 1.1074 ± 0.079 | 0.969 ± 0.043 | −1.18 |
| 3HIDH | 677 | 1.031 ± 0.065 | 1.025 ± 0.044 | 1.185 ± 0.030 | 1.154 ± 0.134 | −1.13 | |
| AATM | 523 | 0.809 ± 0.061 | 0.848 ± 0.072 | 1.039 ± 0.170 | 0.922 ± 0.053 | −1.16 | |
| Succinyl-CoA:3-ketoacid-coenzyme A transferase 1 | SCOT1 | 164 | 0.930 ± 0.104 | 0.947 ± 0.093 | 1.093 ± 0.051 | 1.082 ± 0.084 | −1.17 |
| Beta-enolase | ENOB | 341 | 1.104 ± 0.033 | 0.996 ± 0.053 | 1.146 ± 0.077 | 1.134 ± 0.099 | −1.07 |
| Beta-enolase | ENOB | 410 | 2.121 ± 1.562 | 1.569 ± 0.435 | 1.017 ± 0.246 | 0.530 ± 0.247 | +2.57 |
| Beta-enolase | ENOB | 379 | 0.879 ± 0.063 | 1.084 ± 0.104 | 0.870 ± 0.020 | 0.858 ± 0.018 | +1.06 |
| Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | G3P | 413 | 1.553 ± 0.374 | 1.538 ± 0.409 | 0.679 ± 0.457 | 0.426 ± 0.082 | +2.76 |
| Tripartite motif-containing protein 72 | TRI72 | 261 | 1.272 ± 0.112 | 1.143 ± 0.116 | 0.851 ± 0.229 | 0.869 ± 0.127 | +1.28 |
| Tripartite motif-containing protein 72 | TRI72 | 269 | 0.655 ± 0.065 | 0.689 ± 0.091 | 1.306 ± 0.700 | 1.2302 ± 0.338 | −1.93 |
| Lamin-A | LMNA | 329 | 0.979 ± 0.033 | 1.015 ± 0.061 | 1.115 ± 0.064 | 1.139 ± 0.117 | −1.07 |
| Protein disulphide-isomerase A3 | PDIA3 | 206 | 1.808 ± 0.506 | 1.765 ± 1.051 | 0.424 ± 0.106 | 0.448 ± 0.070 | +2.83 |
| Protein disulphide-isomerase A3 | PDIA3 | 220 | 1.727 ± 0.426 | 1.464 ± 0.635 | 1.084 ± 0.146 | 0.722 ± 0.125 | +1.57 |
| PDIA3 | 210 | 0.774 ± 0.399 | 0.669 ± 0.265 | 1.139 ± 0.150 | 1.146 ± 0.118 | −1.75 | |
| NDRG2 | 433 | 0.872 ± 0.191 | 0.985 ± 0.072 | 1.189 ± 0.186 | 1.222 ± 0.152 | −1.28 | |
| NDRG2 | 431 | 0.890 ± 0.197 | 0.920 ± 0.102 | 1.165 ± 0.092 | 1.098 ± 0.127 | −1.37 | |
| Serine protease inhibitor A3K | SPA3K | 123 | 1.159 ± 0.316 | 1.435 ± 0.261 | 0.777 ± 0.130 | 1.008 ± 0.246 | +1.53 |
| Serine protease inhibitor A3K | SPA3K | 139 | 1.098 ± 0.278 | 1.351 ± 0.141 | 0.735 ± 0.057 | 1.031 ± 0.112 | +1.43 |
| Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 1 | VDAC1 | 385 | 1.317 ± 0.320 | 1.245 ± 0.249 | 0.944 ± 0.128 | 0.830 ± 0.191 | +1.33 |
| Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 1 | VDAC1 | 650 | 0.945 ± 0.086 | 0.973 ± 0.090 | 1.102 ± 0.119 | 1.166 ± 0.035 | −1.16 |
| Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmic | SYDC | 156 | 0.831 ± 0.103 | 0.928 ± 0.079 | 1.022 ± 0.059 | 1.084 ± 0.111 | −1.19 |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial | ALDH2 | 337 | 1.058 ± 0.079 | 1.013 ± 0.102 | 1.176 ± 0.100 | 1.253 ± 0.063 | −1.16 |
| Creatine kinase M-type | KCRM | 541 | 0.738 ± 0.242 | 0.853 ± 0.238 | 1.275 ± 0.227 | 1.303 ± 0.279 | −1.79 |
| Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase | HPRT | 757 | 0.768 ± 0.138 | 0.822 ± 0.052 | 1.060 ± 0.082 | 0.874 ± 0.114 | −1.31 |
| Serine protease inhibitor A3L | SPA3L | 539 | 1.557 ± 0.248 | 1.688 ± 0.395 | 0.762 ± 0.657 | 0.311 ± 0.055 | +3.18 |
Protein description and protein ID relate to the Swiss-Prot database entry identified from Mascot searches of CID and ETD MS/MS spectra. Ref# is the gel spot number created during image analysis and is consistent with Fig. 1 and the World-2DPAGE online graphical interface, available at http://world-2dpage.expasy.org/repository/0069/. Relative spot volumes (mean ± SD) are reported for each independent group, i.e. male high-capacity runner (M-HCR), female low-capacity runner (F-LCR) etc. Fold difference values are reported for spots exhibiting significant differences in expression at P < 0.05 at a false discovery rate of <10%.
Present in Table S3 from {Bell 2009} containing genes from the longevity interactome (core or primary interactors) that are differentially expressed in young versus old human muscle.
Contains evidence of post-translational modification: acetylation or phosphorylation (Supplementary Table S1).
Fig. 1DIGE reference map. Reference 2D gel map of rat soleus muscle. Annotations show the reference numbers of spots that were significantly different between either male vs females (Table 3) or high-capacity runners (HCR) vs low-capacity runners (LCR; Table 4). An interactive version of the gel map is available at the World-2DPAGE repository, accession number 0069.
Fig. 2Metabolic maps. The metabolic pathways of glycolysis, fatty acid β-oxidation and the tricarboxylic acid cycle are redrawn from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). For clarity the respiratory chain is not shown in its entirety, instead only subunits detected by DIGE are highlighted. Orange boxes display the common name of each enzyme, the adjacent boxes detail protein spots matched to this UniProt Rattus ID by LC–MS/MS analysis. A ‘heat map’ colouring system is used to display proteins that were significantly more abundant in HCR (green) or LCR (red) groups (Table 4).
Fig. 3Conditional independence maps of tercile and quintile associations. Conditional independence mapping was used to find multivariate association networks within the protein spots differentially expressed between HCR and LCR muscle (Table 4). Log-transformed continuous data of spot expression were converted to categorical terciles (A) or quintiles (B) to assess course- and fine-grain associations, respectively. To construct the tercile map α was set at 0.05, whereas more stringent (α = 0.01) testing was used in the construction of the quintile map. Post-hoc pair-wise testing was used to approximate the relative strength of associations between vertices in order to dictate edge length (shorter edge = stronger association) during the construction of each map. Spot numbers and protein names correspond with Fig. 1, Table 4 and the World-2DPAGE database (accession #0069).
Fig. 4Bibliometric network of PDIA3. A gene model representing the bibliometric network of PDIA3 was constructed by automated text-mining (data redrawn from iHOP; information hyperlinked over proteins; www.ihop-net. org). Nodes (genes) are connected by edges, which represent co-occurrence within sentences of peer-reviewed published literature. Edge thickness approximates the number of supporting sentences. The majority of associations (CANX, calnexin; CALR, calreticulin, TAPBP, tapsin; HLA-E/HLA-C, major histocompatibility complex IE/C; HSPA5, glucose regulated protein 78; P4HB, prolyl-4-hydroxylase beta) were related to protein folding or assembly of protein complexes within the endoplasmic reticulum. PDIA3 was also reported to interact (TUBB3, class III beta tubulin) or be co-expressed with mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase 5 (MAP3K5) and gene differentially expressed in prostate (GDEP) in malignant stages of prostate cancer. Fourteen sentences reported interaction or colocalisation of PDIA3 with STAT3.
Fig. 5STAT3 phosphorylation in male and female HCR/LCR muscle. STAT3 protein abundance and relative phosphorylation of either tyrosine (Y705) or serine (S727) residues was measured in the solei of male and female, HCR and LCR animals (A). Two-way analysis of variance found no significant difference in the abundance of STAT3 (B) or in the relative amount of Y705 phosphorylation (C). In contrast, a significant (*P < 0.05) main effect of ‘strain’ (i.e. HCR vs LCR) was evident for S727 phosphorylation. On average, the extent of S727 phosphorylation was 1.54-fold greater in LCR soleus (D).