Literature DB >> 27718029

Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.

Sergei Grudinin1,2,3, Maria Kadukova4,5,6, Andreas Eisenbarth4,5,6, Simon Marillet7,8, Frédéric Cazals7.   

Abstract

The 2015 D3R Grand Challenge provided an opportunity to test our new model for the binding free energy of small molecules, as well as to assess our protocol to predict binding poses for protein-ligand complexes. Our pose predictions were ranked 3-9 for the HSP90 dataset, depending on the assessment metric. For the MAP4K dataset the ranks are very dispersed and equal to 2-35, depending on the assessment metric, which does not provide any insight into the accuracy of the method. The main success of our pose prediction protocol was the re-scoring stage using the recently developed Convex-PL potential. We make a thorough analysis of our docking predictions made with AutoDock Vina and discuss the effect of the choice of rigid receptor templates, the number of flexible residues in the binding pocket, the binding pocket size, and the benefits of re-scoring. However, the main challenge was to predict experimentally determined binding affinities for two blind test sets. Our affinity prediction model consisted of two terms, a pairwise-additive enthalpy, and a non pairwise-additive entropy. We trained the free parameters of the model with a regularized regression using affinity and structural data from the PDBBind database. Our model performed very well on the training set, however, failed on the two test sets. We explain the drawback and pitfalls of our model, in particular in terms of relative coverage of the test set by the training set and missed dynamical properties from crystal structures, and discuss different routes to improve it.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; Parameter estimation; Protein-ligand docking; Ridge regression; Scoring function

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27718029     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9976-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  33 in total

1.  Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins.

Authors:  V N Maiorov; G M Crippen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Xueliang Fang; Yipin Lu; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Xueliang Fang; Yipin Lu; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Optimal design of protein docking potentials: efficiency and limitations.

Authors:  Dror Tobi; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-01

5.  Shelling the Voronoi interface of protein-protein complexes reveals patterns of residue conservation, dynamics, and composition.

Authors:  Benjamin Bouvier; Raik Grünberg; Michael Nilges; Frédéric Cazals
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-08-15

Review 6.  Win some, lose some: enthalpy-entropy compensation in weak intermolecular interactions.

Authors:  J D Dunitz
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  1995-11

7.  Proteins feel more than they see: fine-tuning of binding affinity by properties of the non-interacting surface.

Authors:  Panagiotis L Kastritis; João P G L M Rodrigues; Gert E Folkers; Rolf Boelens; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  CSAR benchmark exercise 2011-2012: evaluation of results from docking and relative ranking of blinded congeneric series.

Authors:  Kelly L Damm-Ganamet; Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Jeanne A Stuckey; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling: A CASP-CAPRI experiment.

Authors:  Marc F Lensink; Sameer Velankar; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Shen-You Huang; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Andrej Sali; Joan Segura; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes; Shruthi Viswanath; Ron Elber; Sergei Grudinin; Petr Popov; Emilie Neveu; Hasup Lee; Minkyung Baek; Sangwoo Park; Lim Heo; Gyu Rie Lee; Chaok Seok; Sanbo Qin; Huan-Xiang Zhou; David W Ritchie; Bernard Maigret; Marie-Dominique Devignes; Anisah Ghoorah; Mieczyslaw Torchala; Raphaël A G Chaleil; Paul A Bates; Efrat Ben-Zeev; Miriam Eisenstein; Surendra S Negi; Zhiping Weng; Thom Vreven; Brian G Pierce; Tyler M Borrman; Jinchao Yu; Françoise Ochsenbein; Raphaël Guerois; Anna Vangone; João P G L M Rodrigues; Gydo van Zundert; Mehdi Nellen; Li Xue; Ezgi Karaca; Adrien S J Melquiond; Koen Visscher; Panagiotis L Kastritis; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Xianjin Xu; Liming Qiu; Chengfei Yan; Jilong Li; Zhiwei Ma; Jianlin Cheng; Xiaoqin Zou; Yang Shen; Lenna X Peterson; Hyung-Rae Kim; Amit Roy; Xusi Han; Juan Esquivel-Rodriguez; Daisuke Kihara; Xiaofeng Yu; Neil J Bruce; Jonathan C Fuller; Rebecca C Wade; Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser; Kenichiro Imai; Kazunori Yamada; Toshiyuki Oda; Tsukasa Nakamura; Kentaro Tomii; Chiara Pallara; Miguel Romero-Durana; Brian Jiménez-García; Iain H Moal; Juan Férnandez-Recio; Jong Young Joung; Jong Yun Kim; Keehyoung Joo; Jooyoung Lee; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda; Scott Mottarella; David R Hall; Dmitri Beglov; Artem Mamonov; Bing Xia; Tanggis Bohnuud; Carlos A Del Carpio; Eichiro Ichiishi; Nicholas Marze; Daisuke Kuroda; Shourya S Roy Burman; Jeffrey J Gray; Edrisse Chermak; Luigi Cavallo; Romina Oliva; Andrey Tovchigrechko; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Convex-PL: a novel knowledge-based potential for protein-ligand interactions deduced from structural databases using convex optimization.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Monte Carlo on the manifold and MD refinement for binding pose prediction of protein-ligand complexes: 2017 D3R Grand Challenge.

Authors:  Mikhail Ignatov; Cong Liu; Andrey Alekseenko; Zhuyezi Sun; Dzmitry Padhorny; Sergei Kotelnikov; Andrey Kazennov; Ivan Grebenkin; Yaroslav Kholodov; Istvan Kolosvari; Alberto Perez; Ken Dill; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Docking rigid macrocycles using Convex-PL, AutoDock Vina, and RDKit in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Vladimir Chupin; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Protein-ligand docking using FFT based sampling: D3R case study.

Authors:  Dzmitry Padhorny; David R Hall; Hanieh Mirzaei; Artem B Mamonov; Mohammad Moghadasi; Andrey Alekseenko; Dmitri Beglov; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.686

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.