The functional and molecular imaging characteristics of ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate are incompletely understood. Our objective was to compare regional 18F-FDG PET tracer uptake with detailed electroanatomic maps (EAMs) in a more extensive series of postinfarction VT patients to define the metabolic properties of VT substrate and successful ablation sites. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) metabolic left ventricular reconstructions were created from perfusion-normalized 18F-FDG PET images in consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation. PET defects were classified as severe (defined as <50% uptake) or moderate (defined as 50%-70% uptake), as referenced to the maximal 17-segment uptake. Color-coded PET scar reconstructions were coregistered with corresponding high-resolution 3D EAMs, which were classified as indicating dense scarring (defined as voltage < 0.5 mV), normal myocardium (defined as voltage > 1.5 mV), or border zones (defined as voltage of 0.5-1.5 mV). Results: All 56 patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction, 29% ± 12%). Severe PET defects were larger than dense scarring, at 63.0 ± 48.4 cm2 versus 13.8 ± 33.1 cm2 (P < 0.001). Similarly, moderate/severe PET defects (≤70%) were larger than areas with abnormal voltage (≤1.5 mV) measuring 105.1 ± 67.2 cm2 versus 56.2 ± 62.6 cm2 (P < 0.001). Analysis of bipolar voltage (23,389 mapping points) showed decreased voltage among severe PET defects (n = 10,364; 0.5 ± 0.3 mV) and moderate PET defects (n = 5,243; 1.5 ± 0.9 mV, P < 0.01), with normal voltage among normal PET areas (>70% uptake) (n = 7,782, 3.2 ± 1.3 mV, P < 0.001). Eighty-eight percent of VT channel or exit sites (n = 44) were metabolically abnormal (severe PET defect, 78%; moderate PET defect, 10%), whereas 12% (n = 6) were in PET-normal areas. Metabolic channels (n = 26) existed in 45% (n = 25) of patients, with an average length and width of 17.6 ± 12.5 mm and 10.3 ± 4.2 mm, respectively. Metabolic channels were oriented predominantly in the apex or base (86%), harboring VT channel or exit sites in 31%. Metabolic rapid-transition areas (>50% change in 18F-FDG tracer uptake/15 mm) were detected in 59% of cases (n = 33), colocalizing to VT channels or exit sites (15%) or near these sites (85%, 12.8 ± 8.5 mm). Metabolism-voltage mismatches in which there was a severe PET defect but voltage indicating normal myocardium were seen in 21% of patients (n = 12), 41% of whom were harboring VT channel or exit sites. Conclusion: Abnormal 18F-FDG uptake categories could be detected using incremental 3D step-up reconstructions. They predicted decreasing bipolar voltages and VT channel or exit sites in about 90% of cases. Additionally, functional imaging allowed detection of novel molecular tissue characteristics within the ischemic VT substrate such as metabolic channels, rapid-transition areas, and metabolism-voltage mismatches demonstrating intrasubstrate heterogeneity and providing possible targets for imaging-guided ablation.
The functional and molecular imaging characteristics of ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate are incompletely understood. Our objective was to compare regional 18F-FDG PET tracer uptake with detailed electroanatomic maps (EAMs) in a more extensive series of postinfarction VT patients to define the metabolic properties of VT substrate and successful ablation sites. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) metabolic left ventricular reconstructions were created from perfusion-normalized 18F-FDG PET images in consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation. PET defects were classified as severe (defined as <50% uptake) or moderate (defined as 50%-70% uptake), as referenced to the maximal 17-segment uptake. Color-coded PET scar reconstructions were coregistered with corresponding high-resolution 3D EAMs, which were classified as indicating dense scarring (defined as voltage < 0.5 mV), normal myocardium (defined as voltage > 1.5 mV), or border zones (defined as voltage of 0.5-1.5 mV). Results: All 56 patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction, 29% ± 12%). Severe PET defects were larger than dense scarring, at 63.0 ± 48.4 cm2 versus 13.8 ± 33.1 cm2 (P < 0.001). Similarly, moderate/severe PET defects (≤70%) were larger than areas with abnormal voltage (≤1.5 mV) measuring 105.1 ± 67.2 cm2 versus 56.2 ± 62.6 cm2 (P < 0.001). Analysis of bipolar voltage (23,389 mapping points) showed decreased voltage among severe PET defects (n = 10,364; 0.5 ± 0.3 mV) and moderate PET defects (n = 5,243; 1.5 ± 0.9 mV, P < 0.01), with normal voltage among normal PET areas (>70% uptake) (n = 7,782, 3.2 ± 1.3 mV, P < 0.001). Eighty-eight percent of VT channel or exit sites (n = 44) were metabolically abnormal (severe PET defect, 78%; moderate PET defect, 10%), whereas 12% (n = 6) were in PET-normal areas. Metabolic channels (n = 26) existed in 45% (n = 25) of patients, with an average length and width of 17.6 ± 12.5 mm and 10.3 ± 4.2 mm, respectively. Metabolic channels were oriented predominantly in the apex or base (86%), harboring VT channel or exit sites in 31%. Metabolic rapid-transition areas (>50% change in 18F-FDG tracer uptake/15 mm) were detected in 59% of cases (n = 33), colocalizing to VT channels or exit sites (15%) or near these sites (85%, 12.8 ± 8.5 mm). Metabolism-voltage mismatches in which there was a severe PET defect but voltage indicating normal myocardium were seen in 21% of patients (n = 12), 41% of whom were harboring VT channel or exit sites. Conclusion: Abnormal 18F-FDG uptake categories could be detected using incremental 3D step-up reconstructions. They predicted decreasing bipolar voltages and VT channel or exit sites in about 90% of cases. Additionally, functional imaging allowed detection of novel molecular tissue characteristics within the ischemic VT substrate such as metabolic channels, rapid-transition areas, and metabolism-voltage mismatches demonstrating intrasubstrate heterogeneity and providing possible targets for imaging-guided ablation.
Authors: Mohammed Abdulghani; John Duell; Mark Smith; Wengen Chen; Søren M Bentzen; Ramazan Asoglu; Tomas Klein; Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Anastasios Saliaris; Vincent See; Stephen Shorofsky; Vasken Dilsizian; Timm Dickfeld Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Vasken Dilsizian; Stephen L Bacharach; Rob S Beanlands; Steven R Bergmann; Dominique Delbeke; Sharmila Dorbala; Robert J Gropler; Juhani Knuuti; Heinrich R Schelbert; Mark I Travin Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: J M de Bakker; F J van Capelle; M J Janse; A A Wilde; R Coronel; A E Becker; K P Dingemans; N M van Hemel; R N Hauer Journal: Circulation Date: 1988-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J M de Bakker; F J van Capelle; M J Janse; S Tasseron; J T Vermeulen; N de Jonge; J R Lahpor Journal: Circulation Date: 1993-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Juan Fernández-Armenta; Antonio Berruezo; David Andreu; Oscar Camara; Etelvino Silva; Luis Serra; Valeria Barbarito; Luigi Carotenutto; Reinder Evertz; José T Ortiz-Pérez; Teresa María De Caralt; Rosario Jesús Perea; Marta Sitges; Lluis Mont; Alejandro Frangi; Josep Brugada Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-05-17