| Literature DB >> 24763116 |
Suk-Nam Kang1, Jong Seok Lee2, Joung-Hyun Park3, Jae-Hyeon Cho4, Jae-Hong Park5, Kwang-Keun Cho6, Ok-Hwan Lee7, Il-Suk Kim8.
Abstract
Drynariae rhizoma has been used to prevent bone loss that occurs with increasing age. However, the chemical compounds in extracts that act on bone metabolism in herbal medicine are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate and compare the extraction efficacy of polyphenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, and in vitro anti-osteoporosis properties of water extract (DR-DW) and ethanol extract (DR-EtOH) from D. rhizoma. Total phenolics and flavonoids were better extracted with 70% EtOH, and this extraction method also resulted in higher antioxidant activity and in vitro anti-osteoporosis properties in these extracts. In particular, the contents of phloroglucinol, protocatechuic acid ethyl ester, 2-amino-3,4-dimethyl-benzoic acid, 3-(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazol-1-yl)-benzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, syringic acid, trans-ferulic acid, (-)-epigallocatechin, epigallocatechin gallate, quercetin dehydrate, luteolin and emodin in DR-EtOH were higher than those in DR-DW. These results indicated that DR-EtOH could be a good source of natural herbs with anti-osteoporosis properties.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24763116 PMCID: PMC4011064 DOI: 10.3390/nu6041737
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Total phenolic and flavonoid contents (dry basis) of water and ethanol extracts from Drynariae rhizoma.
| Phenolic Compound | RT | DR-DW | DR-EtOH |
|---|---|---|---|
| | |||
| phloroglucinol | 7.27 | - | 129.29 ± 0.69 |
| 4-hydroxy benzhydrazide derivative | 7.57 | 72.73 ± 0.05 | 72.63 ± 0.19 |
| gallic acid | 8.45 | 20.70 ± 0.42 a | 15.59 ± 0.29 b |
| vanillic acid | 21.91 | 32.18 ± 0.31 b | 42.94 ± 0.37 a |
| protocatechuic acid ethyl ester | 34.92 | 17.17 ± 19.84 b | 32.37 ± 0.18 a |
| 2-amino-3,4-dimethyl-benzoic acid | 33.37 | 182.55 ± 0.63 | 206.44 ± 0.48 a |
| | 34.62 | 9.41 ± 0.12 a | 2.94 ± 0.09 b |
| alizarin | 44.00 | 7.86 ± 0.06 a | 0.05 ± 0.07 b |
| 4-(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazol-1-yl)-benzoic acid | 39.85 | 59.85 ± 0.06 b | 127.23 ± 0.17 a |
| | |||
| chlorogenic acid | 23.17 | 71.26 ± 0.36 b | 212.76 ± 1.76 a |
| caffeic acid | 23.16 | 6.43 ± 0.25 a | 5.91 ± 0.9 b |
| syringic acid | 24.10 | 4.09 ± 0.13 b | 27.37 ± 0.21 a |
| | 30.76 | 22.77 ± 0.01 a | 16.46 ± 0.05 b |
| chlorogenic derivative | 31.23 | 268.66 ± 0.18 a | 71.16 ± 0.85 b |
| | 32.51 | 547.54 ± 0.62 b | 620.02 ± 0.03 a |
| coumarin | 35.66 | - | - |
| 1323.22 ± 19.85 | 1583.16 ± 0.46 | ||
| | |||
| (+)-catechin hydrate | 21.24 | 255.58 ± 0.59 | 258.41 ± 0.15 |
| catechin gallate | 33.77 | 13.38 ± 0.12 | 13.33 ± 0.19 |
| gallocatechin | 17.68 | - | - |
| (−)-epigallocatechin | 18.58 | 7,152.94 ± 2.91 b | 8,954.97 ± 1.46 a |
| epicatechin | 25.60 | - | - |
| epigallocatechin gallate | 27.27 | 42.18 ± 0.12 b | 70.18 ± 0.11 a |
| quercetin hydrate | 35.45 | 1.25 ± 0.07 | 1.40 ± 0.14 |
| myricetin | 37.59 | - | - |
| morin hydrate | 38.96 | 58.41 ± 14.23 a | 40.37 ± 0.19 b |
| quercetin dihydrate | 40.50 | 56.99 ± 0.02 b | 78.40 ± 0.35 |
| morin derivative | 42.19 | 10.23 ± 0.24 | 10.13 ± 0.10 |
| kaempferol | 42.43 | 7.26 ± 0.19 | 7.19 ± 0.09 |
| 3-hydroxyflavone | 45.80 | 210.63 ± 0.23 a | - b |
| | |||
| rutin hydrate | 33.77 | 9.84 ± 0.20 | 9.74 ± 0.34 |
| luteolin | 40.67 | 7.08 ± 0.12 b | 18.48 ± 0.39 a |
| | |||
| naringin | 34.77 | 78.84 ± 0.20 a | 58.79 ± 0.13 b |
| | |||
| rhein | 44.47 | - | - |
| emodin | 45.83 | 4.48 ± 0.03 b | 22.07 ± 0.04 a |
| 7909.11 ± 10.84 b | 9543.45 ± 1.07 a |
DR-DW, water extracts from D. rhizoma; DR-EtOH, 70% ethanol extracts from D. rhizome; the data presented as the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations; -, not detected; a,b Means ± SD were significantly different within the same row (p < 0.05).
Figure 1The radical scavenging activity of water and ethanol extracts from Drynariae rhizoma. (A) Free radical scavenging activity; (B) Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity; (C) Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity.
Figure 2Effects of water and ethanol extracts from Drynariae rhizoma on the proliferation of mouse osteoblastic cells. Cells were treated with vehicle (excipient) or various concentrations of D. rhizoma extracts for 48 h. Results are expressed as percentage of control (vehicle). Significant differences were compared with vehicle control (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Morphological changes of mouse osteoblastic cells after treatment with various concentrations of DR-DW (A–D) and DR-EtOH (E–H) from Drynariae rhizoma. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Figure 4Effects of water and ethanol extracts from Drynariae rhizoma on DNA synthesis of mouse osteoblastic cells. Cells were treated with vehicle or various concentrations of D. rhizoma extracts for 48 h. Results are expressed as percentage of control (vehicle). Significant differences were compared with vehicle control (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Effects of water and ethanol extracts from Drynariae rhizoma on the alkaline phosphatase of mouse osteoblastic cells. Cells were treated with vehicle or various concentrations of D. rhizoma extracts for 96 h. Each point represents the Mean ± SD. Significant differences were compared with vehicle control (p < 0.05).