Literature DB >> 19285200

Screening for osteoporosis in the adult U.S. population: ACPM position statement on preventive practice.

Lionel S Lim1, Laura J Hoeksema, Kevin Sherin.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Osteoporosis is a common and costly disease that is associated with high morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of direct evidence supporting the benefits of bone mineral density (BMD) screening on osteoporosis outcomes. However, there is indirect evidence to support screening for osteoporosis given the availability of medications with good antifracture efficacy. This paper addresses the position of the American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) on osteoporosis screening. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The medical literature was reviewed for studies examining the benefits and harms of osteoporosis screening. An overview is also provided of available modalities for osteoporosis screening, risk-assessment tools, cost effectiveness, benefits and harms of screening, rationale for the study, and recommendations from leading health organizations and ACPM. A review was done of English language articles published prior to September 2008 that were retrieved via search on PubMed, from references from pertinent review or landmark articles, and from websites of leading health organizations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: There were no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of osteoporosis screening on fracture outcomes. However, there was one observational study that demonstrated reduced fracture incidence among recipients of BMD testing. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry is currently one of the most widely accepted and utilized methods for assessing BMD. Other potential tests for detecting osteoporosis include quantitative ultrasound, quantitative computer tomography, and biochemical markers of bone turnover. Testing via BMD is a cost-effective method for detecting osteoporosis in both men and women. Osteoporosis risk-assessment tools such as the WHO fracture-risk algorithm are useful supplements to BMD assessments as they provide estimates of absolute fracture risks. They can also be used with or without BMD testing to assist healthcare providers and patients in making decisions regarding osteoporosis treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: All adult patients aged >or=50 years should be evaluated for risk factors for osteoporosis. Screening with BMD testing for osteoporosis is recommended in women aged >or=65 years and in men aged >or=70 years. Younger postmenopausal women and men aged 50-69 years should undergo screening if they have at least one major or two minor risk factors for osteoporosis. It is also recommended that clinicians consider using an osteoporosis risk-assessment tool to evaluate absolute fracture risk to determine appropriate osteoporosis therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19285200     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  59 in total

1.  Secondary fracture prevention.

Authors:  Robert A Adler
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Bone density testing intervals and common sense.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review.

Authors:  Juliana M Kling; Bart L Clarke; Nicole P Sandhu
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Effect of self-referral on bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Adrianne C Feldstein; Douglas W Roblin; Jeroan J Allison; Jeffrey R Curtis; David T Redden; Mary M Rix; Brandi E Robinson; Ana G Rosales; Monika M Safford; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  US Preventative Services Task Force FRAX threshold has a low sensitivity to detect osteoporosis in women ages 50-64 years.

Authors:  S Bansal; J L Pecina; S P Merry; K A Kennel; J Maxson; S Quigg; T D Thacher
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Who should receive bone mineral density testing?

Authors:  Christina Korownyk; James McCormack; G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Comparison of the diagnostic performance of CT Hounsfield unit histogram analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in predicting osteoporosis of the femur.

Authors:  Hyun Kyung Lim; Hong Il Ha; Sun-Young Park; Kwanseop Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Development and validation of osteoporosis risk-assessment model for Korean postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sun Min Oh; Byung-Ho Nam; Yumie Rhee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Deog Young Kim; Dae Ryong Kang; Hyeon Chang Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 9.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 10.  Long-term therapy in COPD: any evidence of adverse effect on bone?

Authors:  Arnulf Langhammer; Siri Forsmo; Unni Syversen
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2009-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.