| Literature DB >> 24755036 |
Yan-Jun Jia, Rui-Xa Xu, Jing Sun, Yue Tang1, Jian-Jun Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Berberine (BBR), a natural plant extract, has been shown to improve lipid metabolism. However, its effects on PCSK9, a key factor involving in the lipid metabolism, have not yet been evaluated in vivo. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of BBR on PCSK9 expression in high fat diet-fed (HFD) rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24755036 PMCID: PMC4000533 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
The Sequences of primers for Real-Time PCR used in the study
| GATTGGCTATGAGTGCCTATGTC | ||
| | GTGAAGAGCAGAAACCCTATGG | |
| AGCATACCGCAAGGTGTTCC | ||
| | CCAGGTGTCTACTTCTCCGTGT | |
| ATGACACGGATGACGATGGG | ||
| | ATGGGTCCTCCTGAAGAAGTGA | |
| ACAGCAACAGGGTGGTGGAC | ||
| TTTGAGGGTGCAGCGAACTT |
PCR = polymerase chain reaction; F = forward; R = reverse; LDLR = low density lipoprotein receptor; PCSK9 = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; SREBP-2 = sterol regulatory element binding protein-2; HNF1 = Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1; GAPDH = reduced glyceraldehyde-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Changes of body weight and plasma lipid profile
| | (n = 8) | (n = 8) | (n = 8) | (n = 8) |
| Body weight (g) | 325 ± 5.8 | 405 ± 4.4* | 345 ± 9.4# | 360 ± 8.7# |
| TC (mmol/L) | 2.20 ± 0.07 | 2.33 ± 0.12 | 2.10 ± 0.12# | 2.28 ± 0.12 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.70 ± 0.008 | 1.80 ± 0.003* | 1.20 ± 0.015# | 0.80 ± 0.019## |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.93 ± 0.03* | 0.56 ± 0.04# | 0.52 ± 0.04# |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.49 ± 0.04 | 1.10 ± 0.03 | 1.32 ± 0.10 | 1.60 ± 0.02## |
Con = control; HFD = high fat diet; HFD + Sim = high fat diet + simvastatin; HFD + BBR = high fat diet + berberine; TC = total cholesterol; TG = triglyceride; LDL-C = low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol. *<0.05 vs Con; #<0.05 vs HFD; ##<0.01 vs HFD.
Figure 1Effects of simvastatin and berberine on plasma PCSK9 concentration in rats at 6 weeks assessed by ELISA. Values are mean ± SD, n = 8. *P < 0.05, HFD vs Con; #P < 0.05, HFD + BBR or HFD + Sim vs HFD. Con = control; HFD = high fat diet; HFD + BBR = HFD + berberine; HFD + Sim = HFD + simvastatin.
Figure 2Effects of simvastatin and BBR on LDLR, SREBP-2 and HNF1 mRNA expression in the liver tissues at 6 weeks assessed by RT-PCR. Data were normalized to the GAPDH mRNA levels and then compared to control group or HFD group measurements. Values are mean ± SD, n = 3. *P < 0.05, HFD vs Con; #P < 0.05, HFD + Sim or HFD + BBR vs HFD. Con = control; HFD = high fat diet; HFD + BBR = HFD + berberine; HFD + Sim = HFD + simvastatin; LDLR = low density lipoprotein receptor; SREBP-2 = sterol regulatory element binding protein-2; HNF1 = Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1; RT-PCR = Real time quantitative reverse polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 3Effects of simvastatin and BBR on LDLR and SREBP-2 protein expression of the liver tissues at 6 weeks assessed by western blotting analysis. A. A representative western blot analysis is shown; B. Western blots were quantitated as described in methods. Con = control; HFD = high fat diet; Simvastatin = HFD + simvastatin; Berberine = HFD + berberine; LDLR = low density lipoprotein receptor; SREBP-2 = sterol regulatory element binding protein-2.