Yan Wang1, Yongcheng Huang, Helen H Hobbs, Jonathan C Cohen. 1. Department of Molecular Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Abstract
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a secreted protein that promotes degradation of cell surface LDL receptors (LDLRs) in selected cell types. Here we used genetic and pharmacological inhibitors to define the pathways involved in PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. Inactivating mutations in autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH), an endocytic adaptor, blocked PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in lymphocytes but not in fibroblasts. Thus, ARH is not specifically required for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. Knockdown of clathrin heavy chain with siRNAs prevented LDLR degradation. In contrast, prevention of ubiquitination of the LDLR cytoplasmic tail, inhibition of proteasomal activity, or disruption of proteins required for lysosomal targeting via macroautophagy (autophagy related 5 and 7) or the endosomal sorting complex required for trafficking (ESCRT) pathway (hepatocyte growth factor-regulated Tyr-kinase substrate and tumor suppressor gene 101) failed to block PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. These findings are consistent with a model in which the LDLR-PCSK9 complex is internalized via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and then routed to lysosomes via a mechanism that does not require ubiquitination and is distinct from the autophagy and proteosomal degradation pathways. Finally, the PCSK9-LDLR complex appears not to be transported by the canonical ESCRT pathway.
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a secreted protein that promotes degradation of cell surface LDL receptors (LDLRs) in selected cell types. Here we used genetic and pharmacological inhibitors to define the pathways involved in PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. Inactivating mutations in autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH), an endocytic adaptor, blocked PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in lymphocytes but not in fibroblasts. Thus, ARH is not specifically required for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. Knockdown of clathrin heavy chain with siRNAs prevented LDLR degradation. In contrast, prevention of ubiquitination of the LDLR cytoplasmic tail, inhibition of proteasomal activity, or disruption of proteins required for lysosomal targeting via macroautophagy (autophagy related 5 and 7) or the endosomal sorting complex required for trafficking (ESCRT) pathway (hepatocyte growth factor-regulated Tyr-kinase substrate and tumor suppressor gene 101) failed to block PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. These findings are consistent with a model in which the LDLR-PCSK9 complex is internalized via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and then routed to lysosomes via a mechanism that does not require ubiquitination and is distinct from the autophagy and proteosomal degradation pathways. Finally, the PCSK9-LDLR complex appears not to be transported by the canonical ESCRT pathway.
Elevated plasma levels of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) are a cardinal risk factor for coronary
heart disease. LDL particles are formed in the circulation as a catabolic product of
triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism and are removed by LDL receptor (LDLR)-mediated
endocytosis in the liver. Circulating levels of LDL are exquisitely sensitive to changes in
LDLR activity (1). LDLR activity is controlled at
the transcriptional level by feedback inhibition and at the post-translational level by
targeted degradation through the action of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9
(PCSK9) (2–5). The importance of PCSK9 in LDLR catabolism is illustrated by the impact of
naturally occurring PCSK9 mutations on plasma levels of LDL-C (6). Gain-of-function mutations in PCSK9 are associated with 2- to
3-fold increases in plasma levels of LDL-C (6,
7), whereas PCSK9 deficiency results in very low
plasma LDL-C levels (8).PCSK9 is a 692-amino acid glycoprotein that contains a 22-residue signal sequence followed
by a prodomain and a catalytic domain that shares structural homology with the proteinase K
family of subtilisin-like serine proteases (9). The
C-terminal portion of the protein comprises a cysteine- and histidine-rich domain. PCSK9
undergoes autocatalytic cleavage in the endoplasmic reticulum that severs the covalent
attachment of the prodomain and the catalytic domain (9). Nonetheless, the prodomain remains tightly associated with the catalytic
domain and shields the catalytic triad as PCSK9 moves through the secretory pathway. After
secretion, PCSK9 binds the extracellular domain of the LDLR on the cell surface, triggering
receptor degradation (10).The mechanism by which PCSK9 binding to the LDLR targets the receptor for degradation is
not understood. After LDL binds the LDLR on the cell surface, the LDL:LDLR complex is
internalized via clathrin-coated pits and delivered to endosomes (11). In the low pH environment of the endosome, the LDLR undergoes a
conformational change that promotes the release of bound LDL (12). The receptor is then recycled to the cell surface, whereas the
LDL is delivered to lysosomes (1). Usually, each
LDLR undergoes multiple rounds of internalization and recycling.Direct binding of PCSK9 to the LDLR at the cell surface is essential for PCSK9-mediated
degradation of the receptor (13). PCSK9 binds
specifically to epidermal growth factor-like repeat (EGF)-A, the first of three EGF-like
repeats in the EGF precursor domain of the LDLR (13, 14). In addition to the EGFA-like
repeat, the β-propeller domain and at least three copies of the ligand binding repeats
of the LDLR are required for PCSK9-mediated degradation of the receptor (13, 14).
Unlike LDL, the binding affinity of PCSK9 for the LDLR increases with a reduction in pH
(13, 15, 16). Although the C-terminal domain
of PCSK9 is not required for LDLR binding, it is required for LDLR degradation (14). A recent study indicates that the domain can be
replaced by a heterologous protein (dsRED) of comparable size and charge (17). The roles of the β-propeller domain and the
ligand binding repeats of the LDLR and of the C-terminal domain of PCSK9 in LDLR
degradation are not known. Recently, it was reported that the C-terminal domain of PCSK9
associates with the ligand-binding domain of the LDLR in a pH-dependent manner (18, 19).The present study was undertaken to elucidate the pathways and proteins involved in
PCSK9-mediated degradation of the LDLR. We used genetic and pharmacological inhibitors to
block protein degradation by the proteasome, autophagy, and lysosome and traced the effect
of these agents on the intracellular itinerary of the PCSK9-LDLR complex. Our data are
consistent with a model in which PCSK9-bound LDLRs are internalized via clathrin-mediated
endocytosis and routed to lysosomes via a pathway that does not require ubiquitination of
the receptor or the major components of the endosomal sorting complex required for
trafficking (ESCRT) pathway and does not involve the core components of the autophagocytic
machinery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Cell culture medium and PBS were obtained from Meditech, Inc. (Herndon, VA), and FBS
was obtained from Atlanta Biologicals (Lawrenceville, GA). EDTA-free protein
inhibitor cocktail was purchased from Roche Applied Science (Indianapolis, IN), and
MG132 was purchased from Calbiochem (Billerica, MA). Lipofectamine 2000 and
LipofectamineTM RNAiMax were obtained from Invitrogen(Grand Island,
NY). All other chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma (St Louis, MO) unless
otherwise specified.The following antibodies were used in the experiments described: HL-1, a mouse
monoclonal antibody (Ab) to the linker sequence between the 4th and 5th ligand
binding repeat of humanLDLR (20); 3143, a
rabbit polyclonal Ab against a peptide comprising the 14 C-terminal residues of mouseLDLR (21); rabbit polyclonal antisera
against full-length humanPCSK9 (172C) (14)
and against the C-terminal 15 residues of autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia
(ARH) (22); and a polyclonal antibody (804c)
against HMG-CoA reductase, IgG-A9, a mouse MAb against the catalytic domain of
hamsterHMG-CoA reductase (amino acids 450–887) (23). In addition, antibodies were purchased to detect calnexin
(StressGen, Farmingdale, NY), LC3B (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), clathrin heavy
chain (BD Transduction Laboratory, San Jose, CA), GM130 (Sigma), cathepsin D and
actin (Sigma), TSG101 and hepatocyte growth factor-regulated Tyr-kinase substrate
(HRS) (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (Millipore,
Billerica, MA), Atg5 (Sigma), ubiquitin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Santa Cruz,
CA), and EEA1 (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA). Alexa Fluor® 488 Donkey Anti-Mouse
IgG was obtained from Invitrogen.
Biotinylation and immunoblot analysis
Cell surface proteins were biotinylated as described (13). Cell lysates were prepared in 150 μl of lysis buffer
(1% v/v Triton-X100, 50 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA plus protease
inhibitor). A total of 90 μl of cell lysate was added to 50 μl of a 1:1 mixture
of Neutravidin-agarose (Pierce) and lysis buffer (410 μl). The mixture was rotated
overnight at 4°C. After centrifugation at 3,000 g for 5 min, the
pellets were washed three times in lysis buffer for 10 min at 4°C. Cell surface
proteins were eluted from the beads in 1× SDS loading buffer (31 mM TrisCl [pH
6.8], 1% SDS, 12.5% glycerol, 0.0025% bromophenol) for 5 min at 95°C. Proteins
were analyzed by immunoblotting as described (13). Briefly, protein samples were separated on 8% SDS-PAGE gels and
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare). Antibody binding was
detected using HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG or goat anti-rabbit IgG (GE
Healthcare) followed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Pierce). The membranes
were then exposed to F-BX810TM Blue X-Ray films (Phoenix Research Products, Hayward,
CA).To quantify the immunoblot signals, films were scanned using a HP Scanjet 5590 and
quantified using ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). The intensity of each band was
corrected for background using a blank from the same film and then normalized using a
loading control (Calnexin or Actin) run on the same gel. The value of the control
(Lane 1) on each gel was set to one.
Cell culture
Lymphocytes were isolated from circulating blood, immortalized using the Epstein-Barr
virus, and cultured as described (24).
Immortalized lymphocytes were maintained in medium A (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented
with 10% [v/v] FCS, 100 units/ml penicillin G, and streptomycin). To up-regulate LDLR
expression, lymphocytes (5 × 105 cells/ml) were grown for 2 days in
medium B (medium A with 10% [v/v] human lipoprotein-poor serum in place of FCS).
Cells were resuspended in a 35 mm dish at a density of 1 × 106
cells/ml.HuH7 cells were cultured in medium C (high glucoseDMEM medium [hDMEM] plus 10% FCS
and 100 units/ml penicillin G/streptomycin). The medium was switched to medium D
(hDMEM plus 10% newborn calf lipoprotein-poor serum [NCLPPS]) with the addition of
PCSK9. Mousehepatoma (Hepa1c1c7) cells were cultured in MEMα medium
(Invitrogen), fibroblasts and HepG2 cells in DMEM medium (25), HeLa cells in MEM containing nonessential amino acids
(1:100) and sodium pyruvate (1:100), and humanembryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells in
high-glucoseDMEM medium. All culture medium contained 10% FCS plus 100 units/ml
penicillin G/streptomycin.
Purification of recombinant human PCSK9
C-terminal FLAG-tagged full-length PCSK9 fusion proteins (wild-type and D374Y) were
purified using anti-FLAG M2 beads and size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200
10/300 fast performance liquid chromatography; GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) (10).
Site-directed mutagenesis
A pShuttle- RSV vector containing wild-type humanLDLR (14) was used as a template for mutagenesis. Mutagenesis was
performed using QuickChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis kits (Stratagene,
La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Oligonucleotides containing the residues to be mutated (K709R, K795R, K809R, and
C818S) were synthesized by IDT, Inc. (Coralville, IA). The presence of the desired
mutation and the integrity of each construct were verified by Sanger DNA
sequencing.
Small interfering RNA knockdown
Small interfering (si)RNAs targeting ARH, clathrin heavy chain, ATG7, TSG101, and HRS
and control siRNAs were obtained from Thermo Scientific.
qRT-PCR
ATG7 mRNA levels were quantified by RT-PCR using oligonucleotides specific to humanATG7 and PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. GAPDH was used as an internal
control.
Cell fractionation
HuH7 cells were washed and collected in ice-cold PBS, resuspended in 1 ml of 1×
SE buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA), and homogenized in a ball-bearing homogenizer
with a clearance of 16 μm. The homogenized suspension was transferred to a 15 ml
centrifuge tube, and 850 μl of 1× SE buffer was added. The suspension was
centrifuged for 10 min at 370 g at 4°C in a swinging-bucket
rotor. The postnuclear supernatant was removed and transferred to an ice-cold, 1.5 ml
microcentrifuge tube. A Percoll gradient was prepared by layering 8.5 ml of 1×
SE buffer/Percoll (16%) over 10× SE buffer (1.2 ml) in a 16 × 76 mm
Beckman Ultra-Clear centrifuge tube. The postnuclear supernatant was layered on top
of the Percoll gradient, and the tube was capped before centrifugation for 30 min at
26,500 g at 4°C. After centrifugation, eight 1.2 ml samples were
collected from the bottom of the tube. SDS was added to a final concentration of 1%,
and the solution was vortexed for 30 min at 4°C. Proteins were precipitated with
TCA, resuspended in 2% SDS-PAGE loading buffer, and subjected to immunoblot
analysis.
Isolation of primary hepatocytes
Animal experiments were approved by the University of Texas Southwestern Medical
Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were performed in accordance
with federal animal welfare policies and regulations.
Atg5mice were
provided by Beth Levine (UT Southwestern) (26).Livers were isolated from fetal (∼E16)
Atg5mice, rinsed
in 5 ml ice-cold wash buffer (HBSS [Invitrogen], 10 mM Hepes [pH 7.4], 100 μg/ml
gentamycin sulfate, 0.5 mM EGTA), and transferred to 60 mm dishes. The liver tissue
was diced into small pieces (1–2 mm3) with sterile scissors,
transferred to a 50 ml tube, and incubated at 37°C for 10 min on a gently
rotating platform. After removing the supernatant, 10 ml of digestion buffer (HBSS
with 0.3 mg/ml collagenase 2, 25 μl 1 M CaCl2, and 100 μg/ml
gentamycin sulfate) was added to liver tissue and allowed to incubate for 30 min at
37°C. The supernatant was transferred to a 50 ml tube containing 40 ml cold
medium (DMEM, 5% FBS, 10 mM Hepes [pH 7.4], 100 μg/ml gentamycin sulfate).
Digestion buffer (10 ml) was added to the cells and gently rotated 37°C for 30
min. The supernatant was collected and transferred to a 50 ml tube containing 40 ml
cold culture medium. The particulate material was resuspended in 5 ml digestion
buffer, passed through a 27.5 gauge needle, and filtered through a 70 μm filter.
The filtrate was added to 45 ml of ice-cold culture medium. The supernatants were
centrifuged for 5 min at 70 g, and each pellet was washed twice with
50 ml ice-cold culture medium. Pellets were resuspended, pooled, subjected to
centrifugation, resuspended in 6 ml culture medium (37°C), and plated on
collagen-coated 6-well plates. Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C in 5%
CO2. After 48 h, cells were treated with PCSK9 in DMEM plus 5% NCLPPS
for 4 h at 37°C .
Imaging
The lysosome marker DND-26, transferrin-Alexa488, and the Alexa-546 protein labeling
kit were obtained from Invitrogen. PCSK9 was labeled with Alexa-546 dye according to
the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were treated with labeled PCSK9 and
DND-26 or transferrin-Alex488 and imaged at ambient temperature using a confocal
microscope. The imaging data were analyzed using ImageJ.For immunofluorescence experiments, cells grown on cover slips were rinsed with PBS
and buffer A (PBS+10 mm HEPES [pH 7.3]) and fixed with freshly prepared 3%
formaldehyde in buffer A for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were rinsed with PBS,
incubated in 50 mM NH4Cl for 30 min, rinsed twice with PBS, and
permeabilized with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS for 7 min at 4°C. The
permeabilized cells were conditioned with buffer B (1% [w/v] BSA in PBS) for 30 min
at 4°C and incubated with primary antibody in buffer B. Sixteen hours later,
cells were washed three times (5 min per wash) with buffer C (0.1% BSA in PBS) at
room temperature. After washing, the cells were incubated with secondary antibody in
buffer B for 1 h at room temperature in muted light. Cells were then washed three
times with buffer C at room temperature (5 min per wash) and rinsed three times with
distilled water. The washed cover slips were mounted on the micro slide and left to
dry overnight.
RESULTS
PCSK9 promotes LDLR degradation in primary fibroblasts lacking ARH
PCSK9 promotes LDLR degradation in some cell types (hepatocytes and lymphocytes) but
not in others (fibroblasts) (10). The
cell-type-specific pattern of PCSK9 activity parallels the cell-type-specific
requirement of ARH for LDLR-mediated endocytosis of LDL (27). ARH is an adaptor protein that binds the cytoplasmic tail
of the LDLR and links it to the endocytic machinery for uptake of LDL (27). ARH is required for LDL uptake by
hepatocytes and lymphocytes but not by fibroblasts, suggesting that ARH may be
specifically required for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation (28).To test this hypothesis, we examined the effect of ARH on LDLR protein levels in
transformed lymphocytes. The addition of PCSK9 to control lymphocytes resulted in
degradation of LDLR within 4 h (). Conversely, PCSK9 treatment of cells from an individual who
lacks ARH failed to promote receptor degradation. PCSK9 treatment also failed to
decrease LDLR levels in cells from a patient with familial hypercholesterolemia who
is homozygous for a mutation (Y807C) that prevents ARH binding to the in the
internalization motif (NPVY) of the receptor (29–31). Inactivation of ARH
in cultured hepatocytes (HuH7 cells) using two different siRNAs also interfered with
PCSK9-stimulated LDLR degradation (Fig. 1B),
which is consistent with previous findings (10).
Fig. 1.
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation requires ARH in lymphocytes and hepatocytes but
not in fibroblasts. A: Immortalized lymphocytes (5 × 105
cells/ml) from a normal subject, a patient homozygous for a mutation in the
LDLR that blocks LDL internalization (LDLR-Y807C) (61), and a patient with ARH deficiency were cultured at
37°C. PCSK9 (5 μg/ml) was added to the medium for the indicated times.
After cells were washed in ice-cold PBS, lysates were prepared and subjected to
immunoblotting. The graph represents quantification of the data shown. B: HuH7
cells (1 × 105 cells/60 mm dish) were grown for 24 h and
transfected with two separate anti-ARH siRNAs (ARH-1 and ARH-2) or a control
siRNA (Control). After 3 days, PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) was added to the medium.
After 4 h at 37°C, cells were processed as described in A. C: Primary human
fibroblasts (917), immortalized fibroblasts (SV-589), and hepatocytes (HuH7)
were treated with PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for 4 h, and cell lysates were processed
as described in A. D: Primary human fibroblasts from normal (480) or
ARH-deficient (471) individuals were treated with PCSK9 and whole cell lysate
were analyzed as described in A. All experiments were performed at least twice
with similar results. Proteins were quantified as described in Materials and
Methods. Each graph represents the mean ± SEM for
three independent experiments, except for A, which represents the data
shown.
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation requires ARH in lymphocytes and hepatocytes but
not in fibroblasts. A: Immortalized lymphocytes (5 × 105
cells/ml) from a normal subject, a patient homozygous for a mutation in the
LDLR that blocks LDL internalization (LDLR-Y807C) (61), and a patient with ARH deficiency were cultured at
37°C. PCSK9 (5 μg/ml) was added to the medium for the indicated times.
After cells were washed in ice-cold PBS, lysates were prepared and subjected to
immunoblotting. The graph represents quantification of the data shown. B: HuH7
cells (1 × 105 cells/60 mm dish) were grown for 24 h and
transfected with two separate anti-ARH siRNAs (ARH-1 and ARH-2) or a control
siRNA (Control). After 3 days, PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) was added to the medium.
After 4 h at 37°C, cells were processed as described in A. C: Primary human
fibroblasts (917), immortalized fibroblasts (SV-589), and hepatocytes (HuH7)
were treated with PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for 4 h, and cell lysates were processed
as described in A. D: Primary human fibroblasts from normal (480) or
ARH-deficient (471) individuals were treated with PCSK9 and whole cell lysate
were analyzed as described in A. All experiments were performed at least twice
with similar results. Proteins were quantified as described in Materials and
Methods. Each graph represents the mean ± SEM for
three independent experiments, except for A, which represents the data
shown.Previous studies have reported that PCSK9 does not promote LDLR degradation in
fibroblasts (10), a cell type that does not
require ARH for LDL uptake (32). It has been
proposed that DAB2, another related adaptor protein, substitutes for ARH in
fibroblasts (33). Surprisingly, we found
that PCSK9 treatment resulted in robust degradation of the LDLR in primary human
fibroblasts (917 cells) (Fig. 1C). We also
examined another primary fibroblast cell line (480) as well as fibroblasts from a
patient with ARH deficiency (Fig. 1D), and
identical results were obtained. In contrast to these results, PCSK9 did not promote
LDLR degradation in SV40-transformed human fibroblasts (SV-589 cells) (Fig. 1C).PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in clathrin-depleted HuH7 cells. A: HuH7 cells
were transfected with three different anti-clathrin heavy chain (Clathrin-1,
Clathrin-2, and Clathrin-3) or control siRNAs as indicated in Fig. 1. After 3 days, PCSK9 (10 μg/ml)
was added to the medium for 4 h. B: HuH7 cells were transfected with control
siRNA or siRNA targeting clathrin heavy chain for 72 h as indicated in Fig. 1. Cell surface proteins were isolated
by biotinylation as described in Materials and Methods. Whole cell lysates and
streptavidin-precipitated proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting. The
immunoreactive proteins were quantified as described in Materials and
Methods. Graphs represent the means ± SEM from three
independent experiments. TfR, transferrin receptor.Thus, ARH is not specifically required for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. The
reason why PCSK9 fails to stimulate receptor degradation in transformed fibroblasts
remains to be elucidated.
PCSK9 engages the LDLR at the cell surface (10), but the mechanisms responsible for its effects on LDLR trafficking
have not been molecularly defined. Knockdown of the mRNA encoding clathrin heavy
chain in cultured hepatocytes (HuH7) blocked PCSK9-mediated degradation of the LDLR
(). The level of LDLR
was increased in the clathrin siRNA-treated cells. Clathrin also participates in the
delivery of proteins from the Golgi to the cell surface (34). To ensure that clathrin knockdown did not prevent the
delivery of newly synthesized LDLRs from the Golgi to the plasma membrane, we
examined the effect of clathrin depletion on the amount of cell surface LDLR by using
biotinylation to label cell surface proteins. The transferrin receptor and clathrin
served as positive and negative controls, respectively, for biotinylation of cell
surface proteins. The enrichment of LDLR on the cell surface of clathrin-depleted
cells was comparable to that observed in clathrin-replete cells (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in clathrin-depleted HuH7 cells. A: HuH7 cells
were transfected with three different anti-clathrin heavy chain (Clathrin-1,
Clathrin-2, and Clathrin-3) or control siRNAs as indicated in Fig. 1. After 3 days, PCSK9 (10 μg/ml)
was added to the medium for 4 h. B: HuH7 cells were transfected with control
siRNA or siRNA targeting clathrin heavy chain for 72 h as indicated in Fig. 1. Cell surface proteins were isolated
by biotinylation as described in Materials and Methods. Whole cell lysates and
streptavidin-precipitated proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting. The
immunoreactive proteins were quantified as described in Materials and
Methods. Graphs represent the means ± SEM from three
independent experiments. TfR, transferrin receptor.
These data indicate that PCSK9 binding at the cell surface does not reroute the LDLR
to an alternative uptake pathway, as occurs for some other receptors, such as the
EGFR (35–37). Rather, the PCSK9-LDLR complex is internalized by the same
endocytic machinery that imports LDL.
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation does not require ubiquitination of the LDL
receptor tail or proteasome function
Ubiquitin functions as a targeting signal for protein degradation by proteasomes and
lysosomes and is essential for degradation of LDLRs by the inducible degrader of the
LDLR (IDOL) (38). To determine if
ubiquitination of LDLR is required for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation, we
substituted all of the lysines in the cytoplasmic tail of the LDLR with arginine
residues and mutated a cysteine residue (C818) that is ubiquitinated by IDOL (38) to serine or introduced a mutation that
truncates the protein at residue 812 (E812×). A construct in which the tyrosine
in the internalization motif was mutated to cytosine (Y807C, the so-called “JD
mutation”) was used as a positive control (29, 30) (). Substitution of the lysine residues and
cysteine residue of the LDLR cytoplasmic tail had no discernible effect on
PCSK9-mediated degradation of the receptor, whereas the Y807C substitution, which
disrupts the internalization sequence, protected the receptor from degradation. Thus,
ubiquitination of the LDLR is not required for PCSK9-mediated degradation of the
receptor under these conditions.
Fig. 3.
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation and the ubiquitin-proteosome pathway. A:
Alignment of the amino acid sequence of the LDLR cytoplasmic tail from four
species is shown. Mouse Hepalclc7 cells (plated at 4 × 105
cells/well in 6-well plates) were grown in 2 ml MEMα containing 10% FCS
(Day 0). On Day 1, cells were transfected with empty vector or with plasmids
expressing wild-type (WT) or mutant LDLR using Lipofectamine 2000. On Day 2,
the medium was switched to MEMα plus 10% NCLPPS, cholesterol (10
μg/ml), and 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 μg/ml). On Day 3, PCSK9-D374Y (2.0
μg/ml) was added. After 4 h at 37°C, lysates were prepared and
immunoblotted with HL1, a monoclonal antibody against human LDLR that does not
recognize mouse LDLR. B: HuH7 cells were cultured as described and treated as
indicated in B. HMGCR and LDLR were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using
antibodies 804c and 3143, respectively. Immunoprecipitates were
size-fractionated on SDS-PAGE gels and probed with anti-ubiquitin (P4D1),
anti-HMGCR (IgG-A9), and anti-LDLR (HL1) antibodies. C: HuH7 cells (plated at 3
× 105/well in 6-well plates) were grown in medium C (Day 0).
On Day 1, medium was switched to hDMEM containing 10% NCLPPS plus compactin (10
µM), mevalonate (50 µM) for HMGCR degradation assays, and hDMEM
containing 10% NCLPPS for LDLR degradation. After 16 h, medium containing MG132
(10 μM), lactacystin(10 μM), or DMSO alone was added. After 1 h, cells
were treated with 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 μg/ml), cholesterol (10
μg/ml), and mevalonate (10 mM) or with PCSK9 (5 μg/ml) for 4 h. Cell
lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis. All experiments were performed
twice with similar results. Proteins were quantified as described in Materials
and Methods. Graphs represent the means ± SEM for two
independent experiments.
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation and the ubiquitin-proteosome pathway. A:
Alignment of the amino acid sequence of the LDLR cytoplasmic tail from four
species is shown. MouseHepalclc7 cells (plated at 4 × 105
cells/well in 6-well plates) were grown in 2 ml MEMα containing 10% FCS
(Day 0). On Day 1, cells were transfected with empty vector or with plasmids
expressing wild-type (WT) or mutant LDLR using Lipofectamine 2000. On Day 2,
the medium was switched to MEMα plus 10% NCLPPS, cholesterol (10
μg/ml), and 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 μg/ml). On Day 3, PCSK9-D374Y (2.0
μg/ml) was added. After 4 h at 37°C, lysates were prepared and
immunoblotted with HL1, a monoclonal antibody against humanLDLR that does not
recognize mouseLDLR. B: HuH7 cells were cultured as described and treated as
indicated in B. HMGCR and LDLR were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using
antibodies 804c and 3143, respectively. Immunoprecipitates were
size-fractionated on SDS-PAGE gels and probed with anti-ubiquitin (P4D1),
anti-HMGCR (IgG-A9), and anti-LDLR (HL1) antibodies. C: HuH7 cells (plated at 3
× 105/well in 6-well plates) were grown in medium C (Day 0).
On Day 1, medium was switched to hDMEM containing 10% NCLPPS plus compactin (10
µM), mevalonate (50 µM) for HMGCR degradation assays, and hDMEM
containing 10% NCLPPS for LDLR degradation. After 16 h, medium containing MG132
(10 μM), lactacystin(10 μM), or DMSO alone was added. After 1 h, cells
were treated with 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 μg/ml), cholesterol (10
μg/ml), and mevalonate (10 mM) or with PCSK9 (5 μg/ml) for 4 h. Cell
lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis. All experiments were performed
twice with similar results. Proteins were quantified as described in Materials
and Methods. Graphs represent the means ± SEM for two
independent experiments.We also examined the effect of pharmacological inhibition of proteosomes on
PCSK9-stimulated LDLR degradation. PCSK9 was added to HuH7 cells in the presence of
MG132, a proteosome inhibitor. Sterol-induced ubiquitination of
hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) served as a positive control in this
experiment (39). 25-Hydroxycholesterol
markedly increased the amount of ubiquitin associated with HMGCR (Fig. 3B, left). In contrast, very low levels of
ubiquitinated LDLR were observed in cells treated with MG132 alone, and the levels
did not increase when PCSK9 was added to the medium (Fig. 3B, right). The addition of proteosomal inhibitors MG132 or
lactacystin failed to block PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation, whereas both inhibited
sterol- and mevalonate-stimulated degradation of HMGCR (Fig. 3C) by ∼50%.Taken together, these data show that PCSK9-mediated degradation of LDLRs in
hepatocytes does not require proteasome function or ubiquitination of the cytoplasmic
tail of the LDLR.
Lysosome function is required for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation
The notion that PCSK9 targets LDLRs for degradation in lysosomes is based on
colocalization of PCSK9 and LDLRs with lysosome markers by fluorescence microscopy
(10). However, Maxwell et al. (40) reported that inhibition of lysosomal
proteases failed to inhibit the degradation of the LDLR in HepG2 cells expressing
PCSK9. Live cell imaging revealed that PCSK9 colocalized with the lysosome marker
lysotracker, whereas very little PCSK9 colocalized with transferrin, which is located
in recycling endosomes (supplementary Fig. I). To confirm these microscopy studies,
we used cell fractionation and immunoblot analysis to follow PCSK9-induced migration
of the LDLR in HuH7 cells. At the zero time point, the bulk of the LDLR localized to
fractions containing Rab5 and GM130 (), consistent with partitioning of the receptor between the
Golgi and early endosomes (41). No LDLR was
detectable in the lysosome fraction, a dense fraction containing the lysosome marker
cathepsin D but not markers of Golgi or other endosomal compartments. Two hours after
the addition of PCSK9 to the cells, LDLRs were readily detectable in the lysosome
fraction.
Fig. 4.
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation and lysosome function. A: Confluent HuH7 cells
were treated with PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for 0 or 2 h. Cell lysates were
fractionated on Percoll gradients as described in Materials and Methods.
Proteins were precipitated from the gradient fractions, size-fractionated on
4–12% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and visualized by immunoblot
analysis. B: Confluent HuH7 cells were treated with the lysosome inhibitor
E-64d at the doses indicated or with DMSO alone for 30 min at 37°C in
medium D. PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) was added to the medium, and cells were allowed
to grow for another 4 h. Cells were harvested, and cell lysates were subjected
to immunoblot analysis. Proteins were quantified as described in Materials and
Methods. Graphs represent the means ± SEM for three independent
experiments.
Consistent with the microscopy and cell fractionation studies, PCSK9-mediated LDLR
degradation was almost completely blocked by the lysosomal protease inhibitor E-64d
(Fig. 4B). Treatment with E-64d also
increased cellular levels of PCSK9 (Fig. 4B).
Taken together, these data are consistent with a model in which PCSK9 binds to the
LDLR and reroutes the receptor to lysosomes where both proteins are degraded.PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation and lysosome function. A: Confluent HuH7 cells
were treated with PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for 0 or 2 h. Cell lysates were
fractionated on Percoll gradients as described in Materials and Methods.
Proteins were precipitated from the gradient fractions, size-fractionated on
4–12% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and visualized by immunoblot
analysis. B: Confluent HuH7 cells were treated with the lysosome inhibitor
E-64d at the doses indicated or with DMSO alone for 30 min at 37°C in
medium D. PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) was added to the medium, and cells were allowed
to grow for another 4 h. Cells were harvested, and cell lysates were subjected
to immunoblot analysis. Proteins were quantified as described in Materials and
Methods. Graphs represent the means ± SEM for three independent
experiments.
Autophagy is not required for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation
Autophagy is a highly conserved pathway by which proteins and organelles are routed
to lysosomes for degradation (42). To
determine whether autophagy is involved in PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation, we
evaluated PCSK9 function in hepatocytes lacking two proteins considered essential for
the pathway, Atg5 and Atg7 (26, 42).
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation was preserved in cultured primary hepatocytes from
Atg5mice (). Knockdown of
Atg7 using siRNAs had no effect on PCSK9-mediated LDLR
degradation. To ensure that we had effectively inactivated ATG7, we examined the
relative levels of LC3B-I and LC3B-II. Atg7 is essential for the covalent conjugation
of LC3B-I with phosphatidylethanolamine, which forms LC3B-II. The conversion of LC3-I
to LC3-II is indicative of autophagic activity. Bafilomycin 1A was added to the cells
to block the degradation of LC3B-II (43). As
expected with inactivation of the autophagocytic pathway, the levels of LC3B-II were
decreased (Fig. 5B); the LC3B-I bands were
only apparent on long exposures (not shown). Taken together, these data indicated
that PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation does not involve the autophagy pathway.
Fig. 5.
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in autophagy-deficient hepatocytes. A: Primary
hepatocytes were isolated from WT
Atg5 or
Atg5 mouse
embryos. After 48 h, cells were treated with PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for 4 h at
37°C. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis. B: HuH7 cells
were transfected with control or anti-ATG7 siRNA oligos as described in Fig. 1. After 72 h, cells were treated with
PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for 4 h or with bafilomycin A1 (100 nM) for 2 h at
37°C. To visualize LC3B protein, cell lysates were fractionated on 15%
SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes for
immunoblot analysis. The efficiency of ATG7 knockdown was evaluated by qRT-PCR
as described in Materials and Methods. Data were normalized to control dishes,
and GAPDH was used as an internal standard. Similar results were obtained in at
least two independent experiments. Proteins were quantified as described in
Materials and Methods. Graphs represent the means ± SEM from two
independent experiments.
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in autophagy-deficient hepatocytes. A: Primary
hepatocytes were isolated from WT
Atg5 or
Atg5mouse
embryos. After 48 h, cells were treated with PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for 4 h at
37°C. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis. B: HuH7 cells
were transfected with control or anti-ATG7 siRNA oligos as described in Fig. 1. After 72 h, cells were treated with
PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for 4 h or with bafilomycin A1 (100 nM) for 2 h at
37°C. To visualize LC3B protein, cell lysates were fractionated on 15%
SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes for
immunoblot analysis. The efficiency of ATG7 knockdown was evaluated by qRT-PCR
as described in Materials and Methods. Data were normalized to control dishes,
and GAPDH was used as an internal standard. Similar results were obtained in at
least two independent experiments. Proteins were quantified as described in
Materials and Methods. Graphs represent the means ± SEM from two
independent experiments.
Knockdown of the key ESCRT pathway proteins fails to block PCSK9-mediated LDLR
degradation
The ESCRT pathway plays a key role in sorting cell membrane proteins to lysosomes
(44). To determine whether the ESCRT
machinery routes the PCSK9-LDLR complex to lysosomes, we used siRNAs to knock down
two components of the pathway: HRS, which is part of ESCRT-0 complex that
participates in the initial selection of ubiquitinated cargo at the endosomal
membrane (45), and tumor susceptibility gene
101 (TSG101), a component of ESCRT-I that couples HRS to other elements of the ESCRT
machinery (44). Depleting essential
components of the ESCRT pathway has been shown to inhibit EGF-stimulated degradation
of the EGFR in Hela cells (45, 46). Silencing RNAs were used to knockdown
TGS101 and HRS singly or together in HuH7 cells () and Hela cells (Fig. 6A). As expected, inactivation of the initial steps in the
ESCRT pathway inhibited EGF-stimulated EGFR degradation in Hela cells (Fig. 6A). In contrast, inactivating TSG101 and
HRS cells failed to block EGFR degradation in HuH7 (Fig. 6A, B), HepG2 cells (data not shown), and fibroblasts (Fig. 6C). Conversely, PCSK9 promoted degradation
of LDLR in HepG2 cells and in fibroblasts but not in Hela cells. Knockdown of HRS and
TSG101 did not affect PCSK9-stimulated degradation in any of these cell types. Thus,
in cell types in which inactivation of the ESCRT pathway inhibited EGF-stimulated
EGFR degradation, PCSK9 failed to promote LDLR degradation (i.e., Hela cells) (Fig. 6A), whereas in cell types where PCSK9 was
active (hepatocytes and fibroblasts), interrupting the ESCRT pathway did not
interfere with EGFR degradation by its ligand.
Fig. 6.
The ESCRT pathway and PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. A, upper panel: HuH7 and
Hela cells were cultured as indicated in Materials and Methods, and siRNA
transfection was performed as described in Fig.
1. The medium was changed to serum-free medium 72 h after
transfection, and after 2 h, EGF was added to the medium. Cells were collected
after another 4 h. A, lower panel: Confluent HuH7 and Hela cells were treated
with the indicated amounts of PCSK9 at 37°C for 4 h. Cell lysates were
subjected to immunoblot analysis. Graphs represent the mean ± SEM for
two independent experiments. B: HuH7 cells were transfected with control siRNA
or with siRNAs against TSG101, HRS, or both. After 72 h, cells were switched to
hDMEM without serum. Cells were incubated for 24 h before the addition of PCSK9
(10 μg/ml) or EGF (50 ng/ml) for 4 h at 37°C. Cells lysates were
subjected to immunoblot analysis. Data represent the mean ± SEM for
three independent experiments. C: Human skin fibroblasts (917) were plated at a
density of 2 × 104 cells per 60 mm dish in DMEM with 10% FCS
and 100 units/ml penicillin G/streptomycin. After 24 h (day 1), cells were
transfected with siRNA targeting HRS and TSG101 or with a control siRNA. On day
3, cells were split (1:3) and plated in new 60 mm dishes. On day 4, cells were
transfected with the same siRNAs. On day 7, cells were incubated in serum-free
medium for 2 h and treated with EGF. After treatment, cell lysates were
subjected to immunoblot analysis as indicated. All experiments were performed
at least twice with similar results. Proteins were quantified as described in
Materials and Methods. Graphs represent the data from the experiment shown.
The ESCRT pathway and PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. A, upper panel: HuH7 and
Hela cells were cultured as indicated in Materials and Methods, and siRNA
transfection was performed as described in Fig.
1. The medium was changed to serum-free medium 72 h after
transfection, and after 2 h, EGF was added to the medium. Cells were collected
after another 4 h. A, lower panel: Confluent HuH7 and Hela cells were treated
with the indicated amounts of PCSK9 at 37°C for 4 h. Cell lysates were
subjected to immunoblot analysis. Graphs represent the mean ± SEM for
two independent experiments. B: HuH7 cells were transfected with control siRNA
or with siRNAs against TSG101, HRS, or both. After 72 h, cells were switched to
hDMEM without serum. Cells were incubated for 24 h before the addition of PCSK9
(10 μg/ml) or EGF (50 ng/ml) for 4 h at 37°C. Cells lysates were
subjected to immunoblot analysis. Data represent the mean ± SEM for
three independent experiments. C: Human skin fibroblasts (917) were plated at a
density of 2 × 104 cells per 60 mm dish in DMEM with 10% FCS
and 100 units/ml penicillin G/streptomycin. After 24 h (day 1), cells were
transfected with siRNA targeting HRS and TSG101 or with a control siRNA. On day
3, cells were split (1:3) and plated in new 60 mm dishes. On day 4, cells were
transfected with the same siRNAs. On day 7, cells were incubated in serum-free
medium for 2 h and treated with EGF. After treatment, cell lysates were
subjected to immunoblot analysis as indicated. All experiments were performed
at least twice with similar results. Proteins were quantified as described in
Materials and Methods. Graphs represent the data from the experiment shown.To develop another system in which to examine the role of the ESCRT pathway in
PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation, we performed the same assays in cultured HEK 293
cells. Inactivation of HRS and TGS101 is associated with an increase in the size of
the early endosome and a reduced rate of EGF degradation in this cell type (47–49). Depletion of HRS or TGS101, singly or together, resulted in
enlargement of early endosomes (), as detected using EEA1, an early endosome marker (47). In parallel experiments, siRNA treatment
of HEK293 cells decreased cellular levels of HRS and TSG101 by more than 80%.
Knockdown of either protein appeared to delay LDLR-degradation at the 1 h time point
(Fig. 7C), but the effect was not
consistent across experiments. Knockdown of HRS and TSG101 had no detectable effect
on PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation at 4 h (Fig.
7C).
Fig. 7.
The ESCRT pathway and PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in HEK293 cells. A:
HEK293 cells were cultured on cover slides as indicated in Materials and
Methods, and siRNA transfection was performed as described in Fig. 1. After 72 h, cells were fixed and
stained with anti-EEA1 antibody as indicated in Materials and Methods. B:
HEK293 cells were cultured, and siRNA transfection was performed as described
in Fig. 1. After 72 h, cells were
treated with PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for the indicated times. Cell lysates were
subjected to immunoblot analysis. Graphs represent the quantitative results
from this experiment. The experiments were performed twice with similar
results. Graphs represent the data shown in the experiment.
The ESCRT pathway and PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in HEK293 cells. A:
HEK293 cells were cultured on cover slides as indicated in Materials and
Methods, and siRNA transfection was performed as described in Fig. 1. After 72 h, cells were fixed and
stained with anti-EEA1 antibody as indicated in Materials and Methods. B:
HEK293 cells were cultured, and siRNA transfection was performed as described
in Fig. 1. After 72 h, cells were
treated with PCSK9 (10 μg/ml) for the indicated times. Cell lysates were
subjected to immunoblot analysis. Graphs represent the quantitative results
from this experiment. The experiments were performed twice with similar
results. Graphs represent the data shown in the experiment.These results, when taken together, strongly suggest that PCSK9-mediated LDLR
degradation does not require the first components of the ESCRT pathway. It remains
possible that knockdown of the ESCRT pathway was not as complete in the cultured
hepatocytes and fibroblasts as it was in the Hela cells. Alternatively, PCSK9-LDLR
complex may enter the ESCRT pathway downstream of the initial components, as has been
described previously for another cell surface protein, protease-activated receptor 1
(PAR1) (50, 51).
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we used pharmacological inhibition, siRNA-mediated knockdown, and
targeted gene disruption to investigate the pathway by which PCSK9 routes LDLRs to
lysosomes. Our data are consistent with a model in which LDLRs that engage PCSK9 at the
cell membrane are internalized via the canonical clathrin-dependent endocytic machinery
but fail to enter the recycling pathway. Rather, the PCSK9-LDLR complex is routed to
lysosomes via a pathway that does not require ubiquitination of the cytoplasmic tail of
the receptor and does not involve the proteasomal or autophagy pathways.To rule out the possibility that PCSK9-binding redirects LDLRs to an alternative
internalization pathway that culminates in degradation, in a fashion similar to that
described for EGFR (35) and FGFR3 (52), we examined the effect of inactivating
clathrin heavy chain on PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation. Addition of PCSK9 to the medium
of cultured hepatocytes in which clathrin heavy chain was depleted failed to reduce
cellular LDLR content. Biotin-tagging of cell-surface proteins revealed that clathrin
knockdown increased cell surface expression of LDLRs, thus confirming that clathrin is
required for internalization of the LDLR-PCSK9 complex that forms on the cell
surface.It has been shown that PCSK9 promotes LDLR degradation in hepatocytes (10), and here we show that PCSK9 also promotes
receptor degradation in lymphocytes (Fig. 1A).
Both of these cell lines require ARH for LDLR-mediated endocytosis of LDL (27, 53).
In contrast, ARH is not required for LDLR-mediated endocytosis in fibroblasts. The
addition of PCSK9 to the medium of transformed fibroblasts failed to stimulate LDLR
degradation (Fig. 1). Hepatocytes and
lymphocytes, but not fibroblasts, require ARH for LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis
(22, 54). These findings, when taken together, suggested that ARH may be
specifically required for PCSK9 action. Here we show that PCSK9 promotes LDLR
degradation in several different primary cell lines of human fibroblasts, even cells
that are deficient in ARH. Thus, ARH is not specifically required as the endocytic
adaptor for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation.Several cell surface receptors undergo ligand-induced degradation via ligand-stimulated
ubiquitination of lysine residues in their cytoplasmic tails. For some receptors,
ubiquitination of the cytoplasmic tail routes the receptor to lysosomes. For other
receptors, such as the VEGF receptor 2, ligand-induced ubiquitination targets the
receptor to the proteasome for degradation (55). Recent studies have shown that the LDLR is ubiquitinated by the
LXR-responsive ubiquitin ligase IDOL (38),
which promotes ubiquitination of lysine and cysteine residues in the cytoplasmic tail of
the receptor (Fig. 3, top) and targets it for
lysosomal degradation (38). Substitution of
arginines for the lysines at residues 790, 795, and 809 and a serine for cysteine 818 in
the cytoplasmic tail of the LDLR protects the receptor from IDOL-induced degradation. In
the present study, PCSK9 did not promote ubiquitination of LDLRs and mutation of the
lysine, and cysteine residues in the cytoplasmic tail failed to protect the receptor
from PCSK9-mediated degradation (Fig. 3).
Moreover, the proteosome inhibitors MG132 and lactacystin failed to maintain LDLR
expression in PCSK9-treated cells. Therefore, PCSK9 does not function in hepatocytes by
promoting ubiquitination of the cytoplasmic tail of the LDLR and acts independently of
IDOL and the proteasome.The pathway by which PCSK9 directs LDLRs from endosomes to lysosomes has not been
molecularly characterized. Several integral membrane proteins, including receptors such
as EGFR, MHC class 1 molecules (56), and
transporters such as ABCA1 (57), are delivered
from endosomes to the multivesicular bodies and then lysosomes by ESCRTs (58). Studies in yeast and selected mammalian cells
have identified several components of the ESCRT machinery (58). Cargo recognition is mediated by the HRS/STAM complex
(ESCRT-0) as well as ESCRT-I, which includes TSG101, VPS28, Vps37, and Mvb12. In the
present study, simultaneous depletion of HRS and TSG101 disrupted the ESCRT pathway, as
indicated by the inhibition of EGF-stimulated EGFR degradation in Hela cells (Fig. 6) (59) and the enlargement of early endosomes in HEK293 cells (Fig. 7) (47), but failed
to block PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in multiple cell types, including cultured
hepatocytes (HuH7, HepG2), embryonic kidney cells (HEK293), and primary fibroblasts. The
discordant responses of inactivation of the ESCRT pathway on EGFR degradation by EGF and
LDLR degradation by PCSK9 is most consistent with the notion that the PCSK9-LDLR complex
traffics to lysosomes independently of the ESCRT pathway, or at least ESCRT-0 or
ESCRT-I. Recently, Dores et al. (51) reported
that PAR1, a G protein-coupled receptor, is trafficked to lysosomes via multivesicular
bodies. Lysosomal trafficking of PAR1 did not require ubiquitination of the protein or
the presence of HRS or TSG101. Knockdown of components of the ESCRT-III complex did
prevent degradation of PAR1 (51). Additional
experiments are required to determine if PCSK9-LDLR complexes bypass ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I
and use ESCRT-III to reach lysosomes.Macroautophagy constitutes an alternative pathway for the lysosomal sorting of
PCSK9-LDLR complexes. Initially considered a bulk degradation mechanism, there is
mounting evidence that autophagy can also target proteins in a highly selective manner
(60). Genetic deletion of
Atg5 in mice and siRNA knockdown of ATG7 blocked maturation of
LC3B-I to LC3B-II, a well-characterized marker of autophagy, but failed to interrupt
PCSK9-mediated degradation of LDLR. This finding indicates that PCSK9 does not use the
core molecular machinery required for autophagosome formation to effect degradation of
the LDLR.Although depletion of key components of the known lysosomal sorting machinery failed to
block PCSK9-mediated degradation of LDLRs in HuH7 cells, cell fractionation studies
confirmed that PCSK9 routed the receptor to lysosomes in these cells. Furthermore, in
contrast to an earlier report (5), treatment
with the cysteine protease inhibitor E64d effectively blocked PCSK9-mediated degradation
of LDLR in HuH7 cells (Fig. 4B) and in primary
fibroblasts (data not shown).Like many cell-surface receptors, LDLR is a long-lived protein, with a half-life in
fibroblasts of ∼12 h. The factors that determine basal turnover of the LDLR have not
been defined. Accordingly, it is not known whether PCSK9 accelerates the basal
degradation pathway of the receptor or uses an entirely different mechanism. In the
present study, knockdown of clathrin heavy chain in HuH7 cells increased baseline levels
of LDLR protein. Thus clathrin is involved in basal and PCSK9-mediated degradation of
LDLRs. PCSK9 does not promote degradation of LDLRs in ARH-deficient lymphocytes (Fig. 1), yet basal levels of LDLR were not increased
in these cells. Taken together, these findings suggest that basal and PCSK9-mediated
degradation of LDLRs occur via distinct cellular pathways.
Authors: David Cunningham; Dennis E Danley; Kieran F Geoghegan; Matthew C Griffor; Julie L Hawkins; Timothy A Subashi; Alison H Varghese; Mark J Ammirati; Jeffrey S Culp; Lise R Hoth; Mahmoud N Mansour; Katherine M McGrath; Andrew P Seddon; Shirish Shenolikar; Kim J Stutzman-Engwall; Laurie C Warren; Donghui Xia; Xiayang Qiu Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2007-04-15 Impact factor: 15.369
Authors: Timothy S Fisher; Paola Lo Surdo; Shilpa Pandit; Marco Mattu; Joseph C Santoro; Doug Wisniewski; Richard T Cummings; Alessandra Calzetta; Rose M Cubbon; Paul A Fischer; Anil Tarachandani; Raffaele De Francesco; Samuel D Wright; Carl P Sparrow; Andrea Carfi; Ayesha Sitlani Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Sara Sigismund; Elisabetta Argenzio; Daniela Tosoni; Elena Cavallaro; Simona Polo; Pier Paolo Di Fiore Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Da-Wei Zhang; Rita Garuti; Wan-Jin Tang; Jonathan C Cohen; Helen H Hobbs Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-08-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Suryanarayan Somanathan; Frank Jacobs; Qiang Wang; Alexandra L Hanlon; James M Wilson; Daniel J Rader Journal: Circ Res Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Melinde Wijers; Paolo Zanoni; Nalan Liv; Dyonne Y Vos; Michelle Y Jäckstein; Marieke Smit; Sanne Wilbrink; Justina C Wolters; Ydwine T van der Veen; Nicolette Huijkman; Daphne Dekker; Niels Kloosterhuis; Theo H van Dijk; Daniel D Billadeau; Folkert Kuipers; Judith Klumperman; Arnold von Eckardstein; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Bart van de Sluis Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-06-06
Authors: Elena Scotti; Martino Calamai; Chris N Goulbourne; Li Zhang; Cynthia Hong; Ron R Lin; Jinkuk Choi; Paul F Pilch; Loren G Fong; Peng Zou; Alice Y Ting; Francesco S Pavone; Stephen G Young; Peter Tontonoz Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 4.272