Literature DB >> 24754851

Additional surgical risk factors and patient characteristics for mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Alpaslan Akyol1, Aysu Akca, Volkan Ulker, Ali Gedikbasi, Arzu Kublay, Agahan Han, Hasan Cemal Ark, Ceyhun Numanoglu.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the risk factors of mesh exposures following abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) in which polypropylene mesh is used.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ASC and were subsequently followed for development of mesh exposure for vaginal/vault prolapse between 2002 and 2012. Demographics and risk factors of the patients who did develop mesh exposure after ASC and the ones who did not were compared.
RESULTS: In 42 months of survey, 19 of the 292 patients who underwent ASC developed mesh exposure. It was found that rates of patients with stage 3-4 prolapse were significantly greater in the mesh exposure group than in the control group (P = 0.04). Rates of mesh exposure were lower in patients with previous hysterectomy (P = 0.03). Also, it was found that concomitant hysterectomy or three or more additional procedures increased the risk of mesh exposure (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: In abdominal sacrocolpopexy operations in which polypropylene meshes are used, stage 3 or 4 prolapse, concomitant hysterectomy and three or more additional procedures increase the risk of mesh exposure development.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2014 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal sacrocolpopexy; hysterectomy; mesh exposure; pelvic organ prolapse; polypropylene mesh

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24754851     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  13 in total

Review 1.  Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Alexandriah N Alas; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Clinical predictors and risk factors for vaginal mesh extrusion.

Authors:  Usah Khrucharoen; Patkawat Ramart; Judy Choi; Diana Kang; Ja-Hong Kim; Shlomo Raz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Takacs; Karl J Kreder
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Radhika Patnam; Katherine Husk; Abhishek Sripad; Kathryn Barletta; Alexis Dieter; Elizabeth J Geller
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-04-16

6.  Mesh Exposure Following Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Katherine L Woodburn; Amr Sherif El Haraki; Andrew I Sokol; Robert E Gutman; Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 1.932

Review 7.  Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review.

Authors:  Dorit Paz-Levy; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Ranit Hizkiyahu; Adi Y Weintraub
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Incidence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic repair of pelvic organ prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh.

Authors:  Patrick Dällenbach; Sara Sofia De Oliveira; Sandra Marras; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Characterization of vaginal immune response to a polypropylene mesh: Diabetic vs. normoglycemic conditions.

Authors:  Rui Liang; Abigail Fisk; Gabrielle King; Leslie Meyn; Xiangwei Xiao; Pamela Moalli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 10.633

10.  Sacrocolpopexy: Patient Outcomes Support the Use of Non-Crosslinked Acellular Dermal Matrix as an Alternative to the Synthetic Polypropylene Mesh.

Authors:  Magdalene Karon; Somu Chatterjee
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2019-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.