Literature DB >> 32300933

Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.

Radhika Patnam1, Katherine Husk1, Abhishek Sripad1, Kathryn Barletta1, Alexis Dieter1, Elizabeth J Geller2,3.   

Abstract

Our objective was to compare success and complication rates following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) based on body mass index (BMI). This is a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent laparoscopic or robotic SCP at one academic center from 2006 to 2016. Women were included if they had a postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) exam and subjective success documented. For our primary outcome, we compared composite success (POPQ stage ≤ I and report of no bulge symptoms) amongst three groups: normal weight (BMI ≤ 25), overweight (BMI 25-30) and obese (BMI ≥ 30) women. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative complications, 6 week postoperative complications, and sacrocolpopexy mesh exposure. Of the 431 women who met inclusion criteria, 140 (32%) had normal BMI (23 kg/m2; IQR 22, 24), 177 (41%) were overweight (27 kg/m2; IQR 26, 28), and 114 (26%) were obese (32 kg/m2; IQR 31, 36). Mean age was 60 ± 11 years, and most were Caucasian, with no differences in demographics or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Median length of follow-up was 49 weeks (IQR 9, 104), with similar follow-up for all groups. For our primary outcome, composite success was 72% overall, with no significant differences in composite success rates between groups. For secondary outcomes, there were no differences in the rates of perioperative complications but obese women had a 2.8 increased risk of mesh exposure (p = 0.02). Obesity was not associated with differences in the success or peri-operative complication rates for SCP in our population, but was associated with mesh exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obesity; Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32300933     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01079-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  18 in total

1.  Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Geller; Brent A Parnell; Gena C Dunivan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Prolapse symptoms in overweight and obese women before and after weight loss.

Authors:  Deborah L Myers; Vivian W Sung; Holly E Richter; Jennifer Creasman; Leslee L Subak
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Paul Fine; Ingrid Nygaard; Holly E Richter; Anthony G Visco; Halina Zyczynski; Morton B Brown; Anne M Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects.

Authors:  Steven Swift; Patrick Woodman; Amy O'Boyle; Margie Kahn; Michael Valley; Deirdre Bland; Wei Wang; Joe Schaffer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Catherine A Matthews; Mitchell M Conover; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Ayush Giri; Katherine E Hartmann; Jacklyn N Hellwege; Digna R Velez Edwards; Todd L Edwards
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Obesity and outcomes after sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Catherine S Bradley; Kimberly S Kenton; Holly E Richter; Xin Gao; Halina M Zyczynski; Anne M Weber; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maribel De Gouveia De Sa; Leica Sarah Claydon; Barry Whitlow; Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Corina Christmann-Schmid; Nir Haya; Julie Brown
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Host-biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Roxanna E Abhari; Matthew L Izett-Kay; Hayley L Morris; Rufus Cartwright; Sarah J B Snelling
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.