Literature DB >> 27659697

Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications.

Catherine A Matthews1.   

Abstract

Sacrocolpopexy remains the "gold standard" procedure for management of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse with improved anatomic outcomes compared to native tissue vaginal repair. Despite absence of clinical data, sacrocolpopexy is increasingly being offered to women as a primary treatment intervention for uterine prolapse. While reoperation rates remain low, recurrent prolapse and vaginal mesh exposure appear to increase over time. The potential morbidity associated with sacrocolpopexy is higher than for native tissue vaginal repair with complications including sacral hemorrhage, discitis, small bowel obstruction, port site herniation, and mesh erosion. Complications are more common during the learning curve of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Appropriate case selection is paramount to balancing the potential for prolapse recurrence with the risk of surgical complications. Use of ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh and vaginal mesh attachment with delayed absorbable suture may reduce the risks of vaginal mesh exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Laparoscopic; Outcomes; Recurrence; Robotic; Sacrocolpopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27659697     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-016-0638-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  54 in total

1.  Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy.

Authors:  A G Visco; A C Weidner; M D Barber; E R Myers; G W Cundiff; R C Bump; W A Addison
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Spondylodiscitis after sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  L G Brito; G Giraudet; J-P Lucot; M Cosson
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  A pilot study comparing anatomic failure after sacrocolpopexy with absorbable or permanent sutures for vaginal mesh attachment.

Authors:  Jasmine Tan-Kim; Shawn A Menefee; Quinn Lippmann; Emily S Lukacz; Karl M Luber; Charles W Nager
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014

4.  Risk of mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy with concomitant hysterectomy.

Authors:  Patrick A Nosti; Joye K Lowman; Terrell W Zollinger; Douglass S Hale; Patrick J Woodman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Margaret G Mueller; Kristin M Jacobs; Elizabeth R Mueller; Melinda G Abernethy; Kimberly S Kenton
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Laparoscopic Repair of Enterocervical Fistula After Mesh Erosion Into the Sigmoid Colon and Cervix After Robotic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Sacrocervicopexy.

Authors:  Leah Mickelson; John R Miklos; Robert D Moore
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: demonstration of a nerve-sparing technique.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Thomas Aigmueller; Heimo Magg; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Catherine A Matthews; Mitchell M Conover; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  A technique of laparoscopic mesh excision from the bladder after sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Thomas Aigmueller; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Cundiff; Edward Varner; Anthony G Visco; Halina M Zyczynski; Charles W Nager; Peggy A Norton; Joseph Schaffer; Morton B Brown; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Laparoscopic minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy or hysteropexy and transobturator tape combined with native tissue repair of the vaginal compartments in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence.

Authors:  Ivan Ignjatovic; Milan Potic; Dragoslav Basic; Ljubomir Dinic; Aleksandar Skakic
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Transvaginal Bilateral Sacrospinous Fixation after Second Recurrence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Efficacy and Impact on Quality of Life and Sexuality.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Antonio Simone Laganà; Marco Noventa; Pierluigi Giampaolino; Brunella Zizolfi; Salvatore Butticè; Valentina Lucia La Rosa; Giuseppe Gullo; Diego Rossetti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christl Reisenauer; Jürgen Andress; Birgitt Schoenfisch; Markus Huebner; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Andrea Lippkowski; Kathrin Beilecke; Juliane Marschke; Ralf Tunn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 1.932

5.  Comparison of UpholdTM Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Chin-Ru Ker; Kun-Ling Lin; Zi-Xi Loo; Yung-Shun Juan; Cheng-Yu Long
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.