PURPOSE: To compute cohort-averaged wall shear stress (WSS) maps in the thoracic aorta of patients with aortic dilatation or valvular stenosis and to detect abnormal regional WSS. METHODS: Systolic WSS vectors, estimated from four-dimensional flow MRI data, were calculated along the thoracic aorta lumen in 10 controls, 10 patients with dilated aortas, and 10 patients with aortic valve stenosis. Three-dimensional segmentations of each aorta were coregistered by group and used to create a cohort-specific aortic geometry. The WSS vectors of each subject were interpolated onto the corresponding cohort-specific geometry to create cohort-averaged WSS maps. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to generate aortic P-value maps (P<0.05) representing regional relative WSS differences between groups. RESULTS: Cohort-averaged systolic WSS maps and P-value maps were successfully created for all cohorts and comparisons. The dilation cohort showed significantly lower WSS on 7% of the ascending aorta surface, whereas the stenosis cohort showed significantly higher WSS on 34% of the ascending aorta surface. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrated the feasibility of generating cohort-averaged WSS maps for the visualization and identification of regionally altered WSS in the presence of disease, compared with healthy controls.
PURPOSE: To compute cohort-averaged wall shear stress (WSS) maps in the thoracic aorta of patients with aortic dilatation or valvular stenosis and to detect abnormal regional WSS. METHODS: Systolic WSS vectors, estimated from four-dimensional flow MRI data, were calculated along the thoracic aorta lumen in 10 controls, 10 patients with dilated aortas, and 10 patients with aortic valve stenosis. Three-dimensional segmentations of each aorta were coregistered by group and used to create a cohort-specific aortic geometry. The WSS vectors of each subject were interpolated onto the corresponding cohort-specific geometry to create cohort-averaged WSS maps. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to generate aortic P-value maps (P<0.05) representing regional relative WSS differences between groups. RESULTS: Cohort-averaged systolic WSS maps and P-value maps were successfully created for all cohorts and comparisons. The dilation cohort showed significantly lower WSS on 7% of the ascending aorta surface, whereas the stenosis cohort showed significantly higher WSS on 34% of the ascending aorta surface. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrated the feasibility of generating cohort-averaged WSS maps for the visualization and identification of regionally altered WSS in the presence of disease, compared with healthy controls.
Authors: Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Jonas Bürk; Ramona Lorenz; Jelena Bock; Simon Bauer; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Michael Markl; Alex Frydrychowicz; Sebastian Kozerke; Mike Hope; Oliver Wieben Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Erik T Bieging; Alex Frydrychowicz; Andrew Wentland; Benjamin R Landgraf; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jonas Bürk; Philipp Blanke; Zoran Stankovic; Alex Barker; Maximilian Russe; Julia Geiger; Alex Frydrychowicz; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Bradley D Allen; Pim van Ooij; Alex J Barker; Maria Carr; Maya Gabbour; Susanne Schnell; Kelly B Jarvis; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Cynthia Rigsby; Joshua D Robinson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Michael B Scott; Hyungkyu Huh; Pim van Ooij; Vincent Chen; Brenda Herrera; Mohammed Elbaz; Patrick McCarthy; S Chris Malaisrie; James Carr; Paul W M Fedak; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Pim van Ooij; Julio Garcia; Wouter V Potters; S Chris Malaisrie; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: David C Wendell; Margaret M Samyn; Joseph R Cava; Mary M Krolikowski; John F LaDisa Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Julia Geiger; Amir A Rahsepar; Kenichiro Suwa; Alex Powell; Ahmadreza Ghasemiesfe; Alex J Barker; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Arunark Kolipaka; Venkata Sita Priyanka Illapani; Prateek Kalra; Julio Garcia; Xiaokui Mo; Michael Markl; Richard D White Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Pim van Ooij; Alexander L Powell; Wouter V Potters; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ozair Rahman; Michael Scott; Emilie Bollache; Kenichiro Suwa; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; Paul Fedak; Patrick McCarthy; Chris Malaisrie; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Pim van Ooij; Wouter V Potters; Jeremy Collins; Maria Carr; James Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Paul W M Fedak; Patrick M McCarthy; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.934