Literature DB >> 24748482

The spatial alignment effect in near and far space: a kinematic study.

Elisa De Stefani1, Alessandro Innocenti, Doriana De Marco, Marianna Busiello, Francesca Ferri, Marcello Costantini, Maurizio Gentilucci.   

Abstract

The present experiment aimed at verifying whether the spatial alignment effect modifies kinematic parameters of pantomimed reaching-grasping of cups located at reachable and not reachable distance. The cup's handle could be oriented either to the right or to the left, thus inducing a grasp movement that could be either congruent or incongruent with the pantomime. The incongruence/congruence induced an increase/decrease in maximal finger aperture, which was observed when the cup was located near but not far from the body. This effect probably depended on influence of the size of the cup body on pantomime control when, in the incongruent condition, cup body was closer to the grasp hand as compared to the handle. Cup distance (near and far) influenced the pantomime even if it was actually executed in the same peripersonal space. Specifically, arm and hand temporal parameters were affected by actual cup distance as well as movement amplitudes. The results indicate that, when executing a reach-to-grasp pantomime, affordance related to the use of the object was instantiated (and in particular the spatial alignment effect became effective), but only when the object could be actually reached. Cup distance (extrinsic object property) influenced affordance, independently of the possibility to actually reach the target.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748482     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3943-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects.

Authors:  R Ellis; M Tucker
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-11

2.  The bottle and the glass say to me: "pour!".

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Alessandro Innocenti; Nicolò Francesco Bernardi; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  J Hermsdörfer; G Terlinden; M Mühlau; G Goldenberg; A M Wohlschläger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; U Castiello; M L Corradini; M Scarpa; C Umiltà; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Ideatory apraxia in a left-handed patient with right-sided brain lesion.

Authors:  K Poeck; G Lehmkuhl
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Visual responses in the postarcuate cortex (area 6) of the monkey that are independent of eye position.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; C Scandolara; I N Pigarev; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia.

Authors:  G Goldenberg; S Hagmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior parieto-occipital cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Jody C Culham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Social requests and social affordances: how they affect the kinematics of motor sequences during interactions between conspecifics.

Authors:  Francesca Ferri; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Riccardo Dalla Volta; Claudia Gianelli; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mu rhythm desynchronization reveals motoric influences of hand action on object recognition.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; M J Riddoch; Glyn Humphreys
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Jenni M Karl; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Press to grasp: how action dynamics shape object categorization.

Authors:  Stefano Triberti; Claudia Repetto; Marcello Costantini; Giuseppe Riva; Corrado Sinigaglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Overt orienting of spatial attention and corticospinal excitability during action observation are unrelated.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Umberto Castiello; Silvia Guerra; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Spatial Alignment and Response Hand in Geometric and Motion Illusions.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Michela Paroli; Natale A Stucchi; Anna Sedda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-14

5.  Vitality form expression in autism.

Authors:  L Casartelli; A Cesareo; E Biffi; G C Campione; L Villa; M Molteni; C Sinigaglia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.