Literature DB >> 2474802

The sequence asymmetry of the Escherichia coli chromosome appears to be independent of strand or function and may be evolutionarily conserved.

A C Rogerson1.   

Abstract

I have examined potential determinants of the asymmetric distribution of nucleotide sequences in the genome of Escherichia coli as cataloged in GenBank release 44. I have used the frequency of occurrence of all possible tetranucleotides in a given sequence catalog or derivative as a comparative measure of asymmetry. The GenBank-cataloged strand and its complement show statistically similar (not complementary) distributions. The distribution is statistically similar in comparisons between the protein coding subset and the total genome, the coding subset and selected non-coding genes, the coding subset and the remainder of the DNA, and the coding subset and stable RNA sequences. I have compared the distribution in the genome of E. coli with the distributions found in the cataloged genomes of Salmonella typhimurium, Bacillus subtilis, and of coliphages lambda and T7. The distribution summed in both strands of the cataloged DNA differs statistically only in comparisons with lytic bacteriophage T7 because only the two strands of T7 show statistically dissimilar distributions. Despite similarities in tetranucleotide distribution, the pattern of codon complementarity in B. subtilis is different than that documented for E. coli. Thus, sequence asymmetry does not seem related to specific DNA function or to documented similarities or differences in codon bias. The sequence asymmetry of the E. coli genome may thus reflect a hitherto unsuspected pattern impressed on both strands of DNA which is or can be packaged into bacterial genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2474802      PMCID: PMC318178          DOI: 10.1093/nar/17.14.5547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  12 in total

1.  Restriction endonucleases for pulsed field mapping of bacterial genomes.

Authors:  M McClelland; R Jones; Y Patel; M Nelson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Bacterial evolution.

Authors:  C R Woese
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1987-06

3.  Compositional constraints and genome evolution.

Authors:  G Bernardi; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Sense codons are found in specific contexts.

Authors:  M Yarus; L S Folley
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-04-20       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Detailed analysis of the higher-order structure of 16S-like ribosomal ribonucleic acids.

Authors:  C R Woese; R Gutell; R Gupta; H F Noller
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1983-12

6.  Evidence for a coding pattern on the non-coding strand of the E. coli genome.

Authors:  C Alff-Steinberger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-03-12       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A computer program to search for tRNA genes.

Authors:  R Staden
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The effect of codon usage on the oligonucleotide composition of the E. coli genome and identification of over- and underrepresented sequences by Markov chain analysis.

Authors:  G J Phillips; J Arnold; R Ivarie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-03-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Mono- through hexanucleotide composition of the Escherichia coli genome: a Markov chain analysis.

Authors:  G J Phillips; J Arnold; R Ivarie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-03-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mosaic structure of the DNA molecules of the human chromosomes 21 and 22.

Authors:  D Häring; J Kypr
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Bacterial genome mapping by two-dimensional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (2D-PFGE).

Authors:  W Bautsch
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  There appear to be conserved constraints on the distribution of nucleotide sequences in cellular genomes.

Authors:  A C Rogerson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Reverse transcriptases and genomic variability: the accuracy of DNA replication is enzyme specific and sequence dependent.

Authors:  M Ricchetti; H Buc
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.598

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.