Literature DB >> 1691709

Reverse transcriptases and genomic variability: the accuracy of DNA replication is enzyme specific and sequence dependent.

M Ricchetti1, H Buc.   

Abstract

Kinetics of incorporation of correct and incorrect deoxynucleotides by three reverse transcriptases have been followed, by gel assay, on a series of DNA templates, including part of the HIV-1 gag DNA minus strand. Insertion kinetics for the properly matched nucleotide at a given place on the template vary strongly from one enzyme to the next. No significant correlation is found between the site-specific Michaelis constants, while the maximal velocities are more closely connected. For a given reverse transcriptase these parameters are strongly influenced by the DNA sequence. A systematic evaluation of the frequencies of misincorporation was then performed at 46 positions. Again great variability was found, precluding a very accurate evaluation of an average misincorporation frequency for a given enzyme and a given mismatch. Qualitatively however, HIV-1 reverse transcriptase is certainly not more error-prone in this assay than the other enzymes assayed. The patterns of misincorporations were again very dependent on the enzyme used to replicate a given template. The variability of the gag sequence observed in vivo among various HIV-1 isolates was compared with the patterns of misincorporations obtained in vitro on the same sequence with HIV-1, AMV and MoMLV reverse transcriptases. A fair agreement was found with the pattern observed in the polymerization directed by the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. The correlation is less important in the two other cases. However some specific changes observed in vivo cannot be accounted for by our misincorporation assay, even when performed with the homologous enzyme, suggesting that an important class of mismatches can only be generated during reverse transcription of the RNA strand. Additional data, using a complementary DNA (positive) strand as a gag template support this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1691709      PMCID: PMC551854          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08278.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  23 in total

1.  Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics.

Authors:  G N WILKINSON
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  The fidelity of base selection by the polymerase subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme.

Authors:  D L Sloane; M F Goodman; H Echols
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Determination of the mutation rate of a retrovirus.

Authors:  J M Leider; P Palese; F I Smith
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 4.  Molecular biology of viral and nonviral retroelements.

Authors:  R Hull; H Will
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  The accuracy of reverse transcriptase from HIV-1.

Authors:  J D Roberts; K Bebenek; T A Kunkel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-11-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Fidelity of human immunodeficiency virus type I reverse transcriptase in copying natural DNA.

Authors:  J Weber; F Grosse
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  DNA polymerase insertion fidelity. Gel assay for site-specific kinetics.

Authors:  M S Boosalis; J Petruska; M F Goodman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-10-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  The infidelity of avian myeloblastosis virus deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase in polynucleotide replication.

Authors:  N Battula; L A Loeb
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1974-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Determination of the rate of base-pair substitution and insertion mutations in retrovirus replication.

Authors:  J P Dougherty; H M Temin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  The base substitution fidelity of eucaryotic DNA polymerases. Mispairing frequencies, site preferences, insertion preferences, and base substitution by dislocation.

Authors:  T A Kunkel; P S Alexander
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1986-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  52 in total

1.  DNA synthesis fidelity by the reverse transcriptase of the yeast retrotransposon Ty1.

Authors:  M Boutabout; M Wilhelm; F X Wilhelm
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Regulation of the reverse transcriptase of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by dNTPs.

Authors:  A B West; T M Roberts; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cloning and analysis of the mobile element gypsy from D. virilis.

Authors:  L J Mizrokhi; A M Mazo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Mutation pattern of human immunodeficiency virus gene.

Authors:  E N Moriyama; Y Ina; K Ikeo; N Shimizu; T Gojobori
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Similarities between Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Hepatitis C Virus Genetic and Phenotypic Protease Quasispecies Diversity.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Martinez; Maria Nevot; Ana Jordan-Paiz; Sandra Franco
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Template usage is responsible for the preferential acquisition of the K65R reverse transcriptase mutation in subtype C variants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Authors:  Dimitrios Coutsinos; Cédric F Invernizzi; Hongtao Xu; Daniela Moisi; Maureen Oliveira; Bluma G Brenner; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Lethal mutagenesis of HIV with mutagenic nucleoside analogs.

Authors:  L A Loeb; J M Essigmann; F Kazazi; J Zhang; K D Rose; J I Mullins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Lower in vivo mutation rate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 than that predicted from the fidelity of purified reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  L M Mansky; H M Temin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Reverse transcriptase and substrate dependence of the RNA hypermutagenesis reaction.

Authors:  M A Martínez; M Sala; J P Vartanian; S Wain-Hobson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  4'-Acylated thymidine 5'-triphosphates: a tool to increase selectivity towards HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  A Marx; M Amacker; M Stucki; U Hübscher; T A Bickle; B Giese
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.