Literature DB >> 24747157

The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.

James W Tanaka1, Paul C Quinn2, Buyun Xu3, Kim Maynard3, Natalie Huxtable3, Kang Lee4, Olivier Pascalis5.   

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to investigate the development of face processing strategies in a perceptual discrimination task. Children (7-12 years of age) and young adults were administered the Face Dimensions Task. In the Face Dimensions Task, participants were asked to judge whether two simultaneously presented faces were the "same" or "different". For the "same" trials, the two faces were identical. For the "different" trials, the faces differed in either the spacing between the eyes, the spacing between the nose and the mouth, the size of the eyes, or the size of the mouth. The main finding was that 7- to 10-year-old children showed no difference in their ability to discriminate differences in eye size and eye spacing but showed a poor ability to discriminate differences in nose and mouth spacing and, to a lesser extent, mouth size. The developmental lag between nose-mouth discriminations and the other featural and configural discriminations was reduced in older children and eliminated by young adulthood. These results indicate that the type of face information (i.e., configural vs. featural) and its location (i.e., eye vs. mouth) jointly contribute to the development of face perception abilities.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Configural processing; Face perception; Face recognition; Face strategies; Featural processing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24747157      PMCID: PMC4055296          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  44 in total

1.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children.

Authors:  M J Taylor; G E Edmonds; G McCarthy; T Allison
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Where cognitive development and aging meet: face learning ability peaks after age 30.

Authors:  Laura T Germine; Bradley Duchaine; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-03

3.  Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Philippe Schyns; Eugène Mayer; Marie L Smith; Frédéric Gosselin; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline.

Authors:  M H Johnson; S Dziurawiec; H Ellis; J Morton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-08

5.  Becoming a face expert.

Authors:  Catherine J Mondloch; Daphne Maurer; Sara Ahola
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-11

6.  Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Martha D Kaiser; Simen Hagen; Lara J Pierce
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces?

Authors:  Elizabeth Pellicano; Gillian Rhodes; Marianne Peters
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2006-05

8.  Differences in discrimination of eye and mouth displacement in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  M D Rutherford; Kathleen A Clements; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Changing abilities in recognition of unfamiliar face photographs through childhood and adolescence: performance on a test of non-verbal immediate memory (Warrington RMF) from 6 to 16 years.

Authors:  K Lawrence; D Bernstein; R Pearson; W Mandy; R Campbell; D Skuse
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.864

10.  Importance of the inverted control in measuring holistic face processing with the composite effect and part-whole effect.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Anne Aimola Davies; Hayley Darke; Kate Crookes; Tushara Wickramariyaratne; Stephanie Zappia; Chiara Fiorentini; Simone Favelle; Mary Broughton; Dinusha Fernando
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  The effect of inversion on face recognition in adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Darren Hedley; Neil Brewer; Robyn Young
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-05

2.  An other-race effect for configural and featural processing of faces: upper and lower face regions play different roles.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Paul C Quinn; James W Tanaka; Xiaoyang Yu; Yu-Hao P Sun; Jiangang Liu; Olivier Pascalis; Liezhong Ge; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-08

3.  Memory and Perception-based Facial Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Chi-Hsun Chang; Dan Nemrodov; Andy C H Lee; Adrian Nestor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Featural and Spacing Processing for Face and Non-face Stimuli.

Authors:  Marcello Negrini; Diandra Brkić; Sara Pizzamiglio; Isabella Premoli; Davide Rivolta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-13

5.  The sensitivity to replacement and displacement of the eyes region in early adolescence, young and later adulthood.

Authors:  Bozana Meinhardt-Injac; Malte Persike; Margarete Imhof; Günter Meinhardt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.