Literature DB >> 24477773

Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.

James W Tanaka1, Martha D Kaiser, Simen Hagen, Lara J Pierce.   

Abstract

Given that all faces share the same set of features-two eyes, a nose, and a mouth-that are arranged in similar configuration, recognition of a specific face must depend on our ability to discern subtle differences in its featural and configural properties. An enduring question in the face-processing literature is whether featural or configural information plays a larger role in the recognition process. To address this question, the face dimensions task was designed, in which the featural and configural properties in the upper (eye) and lower (mouth) regions of a face were parametrically and independently manipulated. In a same-different task, two faces were sequentially presented and tested in their upright or in their inverted orientation. Inversion disrupted the perception of featural size (Exp. 1), featural shape (Exp. 2), and configural changes in the mouth region, but it had relatively little effect on the discrimination of featural size and shape and configural differences in the eye region. Inversion had little effect on the perception of information in the top and bottom halves of houses (Exp. 3), suggesting that the lower-half impairment was specific to faces. Spatial cueing to the mouth region eliminated the inversion effect (Exp. 4), suggesting that participants have a bias to attend to the eye region of an inverted face. The collective findings from these experiments suggest that inversion does not differentially impair featural or configural face perceptions, but rather impairs the perception of information in the mouth region of the face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24477773     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0628-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Are Faces Special to Infants? An Investigation of Configural and Featural Processing for the Upper and Lower Regions of Houses in 3- to 7-month-olds.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn; James W Tanaka; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis; Alan M Slater
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-01-30

2.  The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Paul C Quinn; Buyun Xu; Kim Maynard; Natalie Huxtable; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-04-18

Review 3.  The "parts and wholes" of face recognition: A review of the literature.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Diana Simonyi
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  An other-race effect for configural and featural processing of faces: upper and lower face regions play different roles.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Paul C Quinn; James W Tanaka; Xiaoyang Yu; Yu-Hao P Sun; Jiangang Liu; Olivier Pascalis; Liezhong Ge; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-08

5.  Is the Thatcher Illusion Modulated by Face Familiarity? Evidence from an Eye Tracking Study.

Authors:  Sandra Utz; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The COVID-19 pandemic masks the way people perceive faces.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Andreja Stajduhar; R Shayna Rosenbaum; Galia Avidan; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Scene and human face recognition in the central vision of patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Alexia Roux-Sibilon; Floriane Rutgé; Florent Aptel; Arnaud Attye; Nathalie Guyader; Muriel Boucart; Christophe Chiquet; Carole Peyrin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.