Literature DB >> 24744240

DNA-protein π-interactions in nature: abundance, structure, composition and strength of contacts between aromatic amino acids and DNA nucleobases or deoxyribose sugar.

Katie A Wilson1, Jennifer L Kellie1, Stacey D Wetmore2.   

Abstract

Four hundred twenty-eight high-resolution DNA-protein complexes were chosen for a bioinformatics study. Although 164 crystal structures (38% of those searched) contained no interactions, 574 discrete π-contacts between the aromatic amino acids and the DNA nucleobases or deoxyribose were identified using strict criteria, including visual inspection. The abundance and structure of the interactions were determined by unequivocally classifying the contacts as either π-π stacking, π-π T-shaped or sugarcontacts. Three hundred forty-four nucleobase-amino acid π-π contacts (60% of all interactions identified) were identified in 175 of the crystal structures searched. Unprecedented in the literature, 230 DNA-protein sugarcontacts (40% of all interactions identified) were identified in 137 crystal structures, which involve C-H···π and/or lone-pair···π interactions, contain any amino acid and can be classified according to sugar atoms involved. Both π-π and sugar-π interactions display a range of relative monomer orientations and therefore interaction energies (up to -50 (-70) kJ mol(-1) for neutral (charged) interactions as determined using quantum chemical calculations). In general, DNA-protein π-interactions are more prevalent than perhaps currently accepted and the role of such interactions in many biological processes may yet to be uncovered.
© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24744240      PMCID: PMC4041443          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  115 in total

1.  Structure of the N6-adenine DNA methyltransferase M.TaqI in complex with DNA and a cofactor analog.

Authors:  K Goedecke; M Pignot; R S Goody; A J Scheidig; E Weinhold
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-02

Review 2.  Protein-protein interactions as targets for antiviral chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arianna Loregian; Howard S Marsden; Giorgio Palù
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.989

3.  Performance of Non-Local and Atom-Pairwise Dispersion Corrections to DFT for Structural Parameters of Molecules with Noncovalent Interactions.

Authors:  Waldemar Hujo; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 4.  Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package.

Authors:  Yihan Shao; Laszlo Fusti Molnar; Yousung Jung; Jörg Kussmann; Christian Ochsenfeld; Shawn T Brown; Andrew T B Gilbert; Lyudmila V Slipchenko; Sergey V Levchenko; Darragh P O'Neill; Robert A DiStasio; Rohini C Lochan; Tao Wang; Gregory J O Beran; Nicholas A Besley; John M Herbert; Ching Yeh Lin; Troy Van Voorhis; Siu Hung Chien; Alex Sodt; Ryan P Steele; Vitaly A Rassolov; Paul E Maslen; Prakashan P Korambath; Ross D Adamson; Brian Austin; Jon Baker; Edward F C Byrd; Holger Dachsel; Robert J Doerksen; Andreas Dreuw; Barry D Dunietz; Anthony D Dutoi; Thomas R Furlani; Steven R Gwaltney; Andreas Heyden; So Hirata; Chao-Ping Hsu; Gary Kedziora; Rustam Z Khalliulin; Phil Klunzinger; Aaron M Lee; Michael S Lee; Wanzhen Liang; Itay Lotan; Nikhil Nair; Baron Peters; Emil I Proynov; Piotr A Pieniazek; Young Min Rhee; Jim Ritchie; Edina Rosta; C David Sherrill; Andrew C Simmonett; Joseph E Subotnik; H Lee Woodcock; Weimin Zhang; Alexis T Bell; Arup K Chakraborty; Daniel M Chipman; Frerich J Keil; Arieh Warshel; Warren J Hehre; Henry F Schaefer; Jing Kong; Anna I Krylov; Peter M W Gill; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Carbohydrate-aromatic interactions.

Authors:  Juan Luis Asensio; Ana Ardá; Francisco Javier Cañada; Jesús Jiménez-Barbero
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 6.  Aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition: energetics and structures.

Authors:  Laura M Salonen; Manuel Ellermann; François Diederich
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Structural mechanism of ribonucleotide discrimination by a Y-family DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Kevin N Kirouac; Zucai Suo; Hong Ling
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Carbohydrate-DNA interactions at G-quadruplexes: folding and stability changes by attaching sugars at the 5'-end.

Authors:  Irene Gómez-Pinto; Empar Vengut-Climent; Ricardo Lucas; Anna Aviñó; Ramón Eritja; Carlos González; Juan Carlos Morales
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  An error-prone family Y DNA polymerase (DinB homolog from Sulfolobus solfataricus) uses a 'steric gate' residue for discrimination against ribonucleotides.

Authors:  Angela M DeLucia; Nigel D F Grindley; Catherine M Joyce
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Carbohydrate-aromatic pi interactions: a test of density functionals and the DFT-D method.

Authors:  Rajesh K Raju; Anitha Ramraj; Ian H Hillier; Mark A Vincent; Neil A Burton
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.676

View more
  35 in total

1.  Aromatic residues in RNase T stack with nucleobases to guide the sequence-specific recognition and cleavage of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Yulander Duh; Yu-Yuan Hsiao; Chia-Lung Li; Jason C Huang; Hanna S Yuan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Anatomy of noncovalent interactions between the nucleobases or ribose and π-containing amino acids in RNA-protein complexes.

Authors:  Katie A Wilson; Ryan W Kung; Simmone D'souza; Stacey D Wetmore
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Dissecting macromolecular recognition sites in ribosome: implication to its self-assembly.

Authors:  Smita P Pilla; Amal Thomas; Ranjit Prasad Bahadur
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 4.  Lone pair-π interactions in biological systems: occurrence, function, and physical origin.

Authors:  Jiří Kozelka
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Insights into the Direct Oxidative Repair of Etheno Lesions: MD and QM/MM Study on the Substrate Scope of ALKBH2 and AlkB.

Authors:  Stefan A P Lenz; Deyu Li; Stacey D Wetmore
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-09-09

6.  Expanding RNA binding specificity and affinity of engineered PUF domains.

Authors:  Yang-Yang Zhao; Miao-Wei Mao; Wen-Jing Zhang; Jue Wang; Hai-Tao Li; Yi Yang; Zefeng Wang; Jia-Wei Wu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Discrimination against RNA Backbones by a ssDNA Binding Protein.

Authors:  Neil R Lloyd; Deborah S Wuttke
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Direct Comparison of Amino Acid and Salt Interactions with Double-Stranded and Single-Stranded DNA from Explicit-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Casey T Andrews; Brady A Campbell; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Structural explanation for the tunable substrate specificity of an E. coli nucleoside hydrolase: insights from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Stefan A P Lenz; Stacey D Wetmore
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  A Catalytic Role for C-H/π Interactions in Base Excision Repair by Bacillus cereus DNA Glycosylase AlkD.

Authors:  Zachary D Parsons; Joshua M Bland; Elwood A Mullins; Brandt F Eichman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.