Literature DB >> 33161373

Insights into the Direct Oxidative Repair of Etheno Lesions: MD and QM/MM Study on the Substrate Scope of ALKBH2 and AlkB.

Stefan A P Lenz1, Deyu Li2, Stacey D Wetmore3.   

Abstract

E. coli AlkB and human ALKBH2 belong to the AlkB family enzymes, which contain several α-ketoglutarate (α-KG)/Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenases that repair alkylated DNA. Specifically, the AlkB enzymes catalyze decarboxylation of α-KG to generate a high-valent Fe(IV)-oxo species that oxidizes alkyl groups on DNA adducts. AlkB and ALKBH2 have been reported to differentially repair select etheno adducts, with preferences for 1,N6-ethenoadenine (1,N6-εA) and 3,N4-ethenocytosine (3,N4-εC) over 1,N2-ethenoguanine (1,N2-εG). However, N2,3-ethenoguanine (N2,3-εG), the most common etheno adduct, is not repaired by the AlkB enzymes. Unfortunately, a structural understanding of the differential activity of E. coli AlkB and human ALKBH2 is lacking due to challenges acquiring atomistic details for a range of substrates using experiments. This study uses both molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and ONIOM(QM:MM) calculations to determine how the active site changes upon binding each etheno adduct and characterizes the corresponding catalytic impacts. Our data reveal that the preferred etheno substrates (1,N6-εA and 3,N4-εC) form favorable interactions with catalytic residues that situate the lesion near the Fe(IV)-oxo species and permit efficient oxidation. In contrast, although the damage remains correctly aligned with respect to the Fe(IV)-oxo moiety, repair of 1,N2-εG is mitigated by increased solvation of the active site and a larger distance between Fe(IV)-oxo and the aberrant carbons. Binding of non-substrate N2,3-εG in the active site disrupts key DNA-enzyme interactions, and positions the aberrant carbon atoms even further from the Fe(IV)-oxo species, leading to prohibitively high barriers for oxidative catalysis. Overall, our calculations provide the first structural insight required to rationalize the experimentally-reported substrate specificities of AlkB and ALKBH2 and thereby highlight the roles of several active site residues in the repair of etheno adducts that directly correlates with available experimental data. These proposed catalytic strategies can likely be generalized to other α-KG/Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenases that play similar critical biological roles, including epigenetic and post-translational regulation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AlkB; Alkylation damage; Direct repair; Enzymes; Molecular dynamics; QM/MM methods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33161373      PMCID: PMC7669730          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  69 in total

Review 1.  DNA repair by bacterial AlkB proteins.

Authors:  Pål Ø Falnes; Torbjørn Rognes
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.992

2.  DFT study of a model system for the dealkylation step catalyzed by AlkB.

Authors:  G Andrés Cisneros
Journal:  Interdiscip Sci       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.233

3.  Investigation of the substrate spectrum of the human mismatch-specific DNA N-glycosylase MED1 (MBD4): fundamental role of the catalytic domain.

Authors:  F Petronzelli; A Riccio; G D Markham; S H Seeholzer; M Genuardi; M Karbowski; A T Yeung; Y Matsumoto; A Bellacosa
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Modeling the chemical step utilized by human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase: a concerted mechanism AIDS in selectively excising damaged purines.

Authors:  Lesley R Rutledge; Stacey D Wetmore
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 5.  The AlkB Family of Fe(II)/α-Ketoglutarate-dependent Dioxygenases: Repairing Nucleic Acid Alkylation Damage and Beyond.

Authors:  Bogdan I Fedeles; Vipender Singh; James C Delaney; Deyu Li; John M Essigmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Computational studies of DNA base repair mechanisms by nonheme iron dioxygenases: selective epoxidation and hydroxylation pathways.

Authors:  Reza Latifi; Jennifer L Minnick; Matthew G Quesne; Sam P de Visser; Laleh Tahsini
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.390

7.  Decreased repair activities of 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine and 3,N(4)-ethenocytosine in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Elzbieta Speina; Maja Zielińska; Alain Barbin; Daniel Gackowski; Janusz Kowalewski; Maria A Graziewicz; Janusz A Siedlecki; Ryszard Oliński; Barbara Tudek
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  DNA repair enzymes ALKBH2, ALKBH3, and AlkB oxidize 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine in vitro.

Authors:  Ke Bian; Stefan A P Lenz; Qi Tang; Fangyi Chen; Rui Qi; Marco Jost; Catherine L Drennan; John M Essigmann; Stacey D Wetmore; Deyu Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer.

Authors:  Upadhyayula Sai Srinivas; Bryce W Q Tan; Balamurugan A Vellayappan; Anand D Jeyasekharan
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 11.799

10.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born.

Authors:  Andreas W Götz; Mark J Williamson; Dong Xu; Duncan Poole; Scott Le Grand; Ross C Walker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  2 in total

1.  The molecular mechanism of P450-catalyzed amination of the pyrrolidine derivative of lidocaine: insights from multiscale simulations.

Authors:  Conger Wang; Peng Wu; Zhanfeng Wang; Binju Wang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.361

2.  Conformational Dynamics of Human ALKBH2 Dioxygenase in the Course of DNA Repair as Revealed by Stopped-Flow Fluorescence Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Lyubov Yu Kanazhevskaya; Denis A Smyshliaev; Nadezhda A Timofeyeva; Alexander A Ishchenko; Murat Saparbaev; Nikita A Kuznetsov; Olga S Fedorova
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.927

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.