Literature DB >> 24744120

Engaging patients and caregivers in patient-centered outcomes research on advanced stage lung cancer: insights from patients, caregivers, and providers.

K M Islam1, Samuel T Opoku, Bettye A Apenteng, Ann Fetrick, June Ryan, M Copur, Addison Tolentino, Irfan Vaziri, Apar K Ganti.   

Abstract

Participatory and patient-centered approaches to cancer research have been highlighted as the most appropriate means of engaging patients in the conduct of clinical research. However, there is a paucity of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) on lung cancer. Previous studies seeking to define lung cancer treatment success have generally not included patients' and caregivers' perceptions and views in treatment decision-making. Additionally, little is known about effective strategies for the engagement of lung cancer patients in PCOR. We sought to gain insights into the perceptions of patients, caregivers, and providers on lung cancer treatment success, as well as on strategies for patient engagement in lung cancer PCOR. Four focus groups were conducted with provider, patient, and caregiver participants from four cancer centers in Nebraska and South Dakota. A total of 36 providers, patients, and caregivers participated in this study. Patients and caregivers confirmed that survival alone should not be the measure of lung cancer treatment success and that definitions of treatment success should emphasize factors such as effective clinical guidance throughout treatment, symptom management, functionality, and quality of life. Clinician participants noted that the definition of treatment success evolved over time and appeared to be linked to patients' experiences with chemotherapy. Participants identified barriers to and facilitators of research participation and suggested strategies for the recruitment and retention of research participants. Our study indicates that patients can successfully play active and engaged roles in clinical research, ranging from participant to partner. Judging from the enthusiasm of our focus group attendees, patients and caregivers want to participate and be engaged in clinical research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24744120     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-014-0657-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  20 in total

1.  Clinical trial recruitment challenges with older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Judith K Payne; Cristina C Hendrix
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.257

2.  Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda.

Authors:  David Wright; Jessica Corner; Jane Hopkinson; Claire Foster
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Factors and outcomes of decision making for cancer clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Barbara A Biedrzycki
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study.

Authors:  Marilyn Kendall; Fiona Harris; Kirsty Boyd; Aziz Sheikh; Scott A Murray; Duncan Brown; Ian Mallinson; Nora Kearney; Allison Worth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-28

5.  Phase 1 clinical trials in end-stage cancer: patient understanding of trial premises and motives for participation.

Authors:  Tove Godskesen; Peter Nygren; Karin Nordin; Mats Hansson; Ulrik Kihlbom
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  From patient to participant: enhancing the validity and ethics of cancer research through participatory research.

Authors:  Connie G Chiu; Terry L Mitchell; Margaret I Fitch
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Kevin P Weinfurt; Caroline B Burnett; Andrew Balshem; Al B Benson; Liana Castel; Sandra Corbett; Michael Diefenbach; Darrell Gaskin; Yun Li; Sharon Manne; John Marshall; Julia H Rowland; Elyse Slater; Daniel P Sulmasy; David Van Echo; Shakira Washington; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrea M Denicoff; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Stephen S Grubbs; Suanna S Bruinooge; Robert L Comis; Peggy Devine; David M Dilts; Michelle E Duff; Jean G Ford; Steven Joffe; Lidia Schapira; Kevin P Weinfurt; Margo Michaels; Derek Raghavan; Ellen S Richmond; Robin Zon; Terrance L Albrecht; Michael A Bookman; Afshin Dowlati; Rebecca A Enos; Mona N Fouad; Marjorie Good; William J Hicks; Patrick J Loehrer; Alan P Lyss; Steven N Wolff; Debra M Wujcik; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Identifying motivations and barriers to patient participation in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jennifer M Jones; Joyce Nyhof-Young; Jakov Moric; Audrey Friedman; Woody Wells; Pamela Catton
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make?

Authors:  Michele Heisler; Sandeep Vijan; Robert M Anderson; Peter A Ubel; Steven J Bernstein; Timothy P Hofer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Sumedha Chhatre; Ashlie Jefferson; Ratna Cook; Caitlin R Meeker; Ji Hyun Kim; Kayla Marie Hartz; Yu-Ning Wong; Adele Caruso; Diane K Newman; Knashawn H Morales; Ravishankar Jayadevappa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 2.  Partnering with patients in healthcare research: a scoping review of ethical issues, challenges, and recommendations for practice.

Authors:  Joé T Martineau; Asma Minyaoui; Antoine Boivin
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kathrine Hoffmann Pii; Lone Helle Schou; Karin Piil; Mary Jarden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.377

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.