Literature DB >> 23605172

From patient to participant: enhancing the validity and ethics of cancer research through participatory research.

Connie G Chiu1, Terry L Mitchell, Margaret I Fitch.   

Abstract

Participatory health research involves a wide spectrum of participation from the population of study. We describe the participatory research processes of a large mixed method study on the psychosocial impact of dragon boating in individuals with breast cancer. In particular, we discuss the involvement of a Community Advisory Group (consisting of five breast cancer patients/survivors) in the development of the research study, data collection and analysis, and dissemination of the study results. We also outline the elements of a research workshop, in which 13 breast cancer patients/survivors were involved in the development of a provincial survey for the study. The purpose of this article is to share our experience of engaging cancer patients/survivors in a participatory research study. We discuss the value-based elements of participatory research (power sharing, voice and respect, reciprocity, and mutual benefit), and provide a case-based example of how these participatory elements were employed to potentially increase the validity of the survey instrument, to enhance the ethics of working with a cancer population, and ultimately contributed to a high survey response rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23605172     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0464-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  26 in total

1.  Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer.

Authors:  D Tallon; J Chard; P Dieppe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN EXISTENTIALISM: THE PSYCHOMETRIC APPROACH TO FRANKL'S CONCEPT OF NOOGENIC NEUROSIS.

Authors:  J C CRUMBAUGH; L T MAHOLICK
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1964-04

Review 3.  Abreast in a boat--a race against breast cancer.

Authors:  D C McKenzie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-08-25       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.

Authors:  B A Israel; A J Schulz; E A Parker; A B Becker
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  What is participatory research?

Authors:  A Cornwall; R Jewkes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Development of an instrument to measure cancer screening knowledge, attitudes and behaviours.

Authors:  T Kindree; F D Ashbury; V Goel; I Levy; T Lipskie; R Futcher
Journal:  Chronic Dis Can       Date:  1997

7.  Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale.

Authors:  M Watson; S Greer; J Young; Q Inayat; C Burgess; B Robertson
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Mental health of older adults.

Authors:  P G Reed
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Development and testing of a quality of life model for long-term female cancer survivors.

Authors:  G K Wyatt; L L Friedman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  A qualitative study of breast cancer self-help groups.

Authors:  R Gray; M Fitch; C Davis; C Phillips
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  9 in total

1.  Empowering Promotores de Salud as partners in cancer education and research in rural southwest Kansas.

Authors:  Ana Paula Cupertino; Mercedes Saint-Elin; Johana Bravo de Los Rios; Kimberly K Engelman; K Allen Greiner; Edward F Ellerbeck; Anna M Nápoles
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  A qualitative study on the involvement of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer during multiple research phases: "plan, structure, and discuss".

Authors:  Camila Rosalinde van Ham; Vivian Wilhelmina Gerarda Burgers; Sophia Helena Eva Sleeman; Annemiek Dickhout; Niels Christiaan Gerardus Laurus Harthoorn; Eveliene Manten-Horst; Mies Christina van Eenbergen; Olga Husson
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2022-07-08

3.  Engaging patients and caregivers in patient-centered outcomes research on advanced stage lung cancer: insights from patients, caregivers, and providers.

Authors:  K M Islam; Samuel T Opoku; Bettye A Apenteng; Ann Fetrick; June Ryan; M Copur; Addison Tolentino; Irfan Vaziri; Apar K Ganti
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Engaging older adults in healthcare research and planning: a realist synthesis.

Authors:  Heather McNeil; Jacobi Elliott; Kelsey Huson; Jessica Ashbourne; George Heckman; Jennifer Walker; Paul Stolee
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-03-07

Review 5.  Partnering with frail or seriously ill patients in research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claire Ludwig; Ian D Graham; Wendy Gifford; Josee Lavoie; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-09-11

Review 6.  Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review.

Authors:  Claire Ludwig; Ian D Graham; Josee Lavoie; Wendy Gifford; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2021-01-31

7.  The VA Point-of-Care Precision Oncology Program: Balancing Access with Rapid Learning in Molecular Cancer Medicine.

Authors:  Louis D Fiore; Mary T Brophy; Sara Turek; Valmeek Kudesia; Nithya Ramnath; Colleen Shannon; Ryan Ferguson; Saiju Pyarajan; Melissa A Fiore; John Hornberger; Philip Lavori
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 8.  Partnering with patients in healthcare research: a scoping review of ethical issues, challenges, and recommendations for practice.

Authors:  Joé T Martineau; Asma Minyaoui; Antoine Boivin
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kathrine Hoffmann Pii; Lone Helle Schou; Karin Piil; Mary Jarden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.377

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.