Literature DB >> 16436157

Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda.

David Wright1, Jessica Corner, Jane Hopkinson, Claire Foster.   

Abstract

AIM: The study 'Listening to the Views of People Affected by Cancer About Cancer Research' is currently exploring the views people affected by cancer have about cancer research and identifying their research priorities. Integral to this is the broader aim of ensuring an effective, collaborative participation of patients and carers in the design and conduct of the study. On the basis of experiences with the study to date, the latter is explored in this paper.
DESIGN: The study adopts a 'participatory research' approach entailing the formation of a 'reference group' and a subsequent patient and carer co-researcher group. Patient and carer members of these groups were identified through the patient forums of UK cancer networks and by approaching 'hard to reach' representatives directly through community groups and participating study sites.
FINDINGS: Experiences from this study illustrate that a 'participatory research' approach is appropriate in engaging patients and carers in the research process. Establishing a group of people affected by cancer in the study was found to be particularly effective in enhancing the design and conduct of the research.
CONCLUSIONS: 'Participatory research' offers an effective means of involving patients and carers throughout the research process, thus strengthening the relevance and appropriateness of research findings and methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436157      PMCID: PMC5060319          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00353.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  11 in total

1.  Challenges of participatory research: reflections on a study with breast cancer self-help groups.

Authors:  Ross E. Gray; Margaret Fitch; Christine Davis; Catherine Phillips
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Programme quality in Australian early special education: an example of participatory action research.

Authors:  W Beamish; F Bryer
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.508

3.  Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer.

Authors:  D Tallon; J Chard; P Dieppe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Doing a doctorate using a participatory action research framework in the context of community health.

Authors:  Marion Gibbon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2002-04

5.  Frail bodies, courageous voices: older people influencing community care.

Authors:  Marian Barnes; Gaynor Bennett
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  1998-03

6.  Overcoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research.

Authors:  Tony Stevens; David Wilde; John Hunt; Sam H Ahmedzai
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  What is participatory research?

Authors:  A Cornwall; R Jewkes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  The public applauds cancer research but not how research priorities are set.

Authors:  S Jenks
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-03-05       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  From individual to group: use of narratives in a participatory research process.

Authors:  S Aranda; A Street
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  How we live: participatory research with six people with learning difficulties.

Authors:  M Richardson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.187

View more
  32 in total

1.  Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.

Authors:  Tineke A Abma; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research.

Authors:  David Wright; Claire Foster; Ziv Amir; Jim Elliott; Roger Wilson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report.

Authors:  Jill Arkind; Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman; Nate Warren; Kay Dickerson; Lynn Robbins; Kathy Norman; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Rosemary Barber; Jonathan D Boote; Glenys D Parry; Cindy L Cooper; Philippa Yeeles; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Close to the bench as well as at the bedside: involving service users in all phases of translational research.

Authors:  Felicity Callard; Diana Rose; Til Wykes
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  The contribution of advisory committees and public involvement to large studies: case study.

Authors:  Mike Slade; Victoria Bird; Ruth Chandler; Jo Fox; John Larsen; Jerry Tew; Mary Leamy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Engaging patients and caregivers in patient-centered outcomes research on advanced stage lung cancer: insights from patients, caregivers, and providers.

Authors:  K M Islam; Samuel T Opoku; Bettye A Apenteng; Ann Fetrick; June Ryan; M Copur; Addison Tolentino; Irfan Vaziri; Apar K Ganti
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  From patient to participant: enhancing the validity and ethics of cancer research through participatory research.

Authors:  Connie G Chiu; Terry L Mitchell; Margaret I Fitch
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  As the bell tolls: a foundation study on pancreatic cancer consumer's research priorities.

Authors:  Carla Saunders; Helen Gooden; Monica Robotin; Jan Mumford
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.