Literature DB >> 24726214

Atypical embryo phenotypes identified by time-lapse microscopy: high prevalence and association with embryo development.

Kelly Athayde Wirka1, Alice A Chen1, Joe Conaghan2, Kristen Ivani3, Marina Gvakharia4, Barry Behr5, Vaishali Suraj1, Lei Tan1, Shehua Shen6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize atypical dynamic embryo phenotypes identified by time-lapse microscopy, evaluate their prevalence, and determine their association with embryo development.
DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort study.
SETTING: Five IVF clinics in the United States. PATIENT(S): Sixty-seven women undergoing IVF treatment with 651 embryos. INTERVENTION(S): Embryo videos were retrospectively analyzed for atypical phenotypes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Identification of four groups of atypical embryo phenotypes: abnormal syngamy (AS), abnormal first cytokinesis (A1(cyt)), abnormal cleavage (AC), and chaotic cleavage (CC). Prevalence and association with embryo morphology and development potential were evaluated. RESULT(S): A high prevalence of atypical phenotypes was observed among embryos: AS 25.1% (163/649), A1(cyt) 31.0% (195/639), AC 18% (115/639) and CC 15% (96/639). A high percentage of embryos with atypical phenotype(s) had good quality on day 3 (overall grade good or fair): AS 78.6% (70/89); A1(cyt) 79.7% (94/119), AC 86.4% (70/81), and CC 35.2% (19/54), but the blastocyst formation rates for these embryos were significantly lower compared with their respective control groups: AS 21.5% vs. 44.9%, A1(cyt) 21.7% vs. 44.6%, AC 11.7% vs. 43.1%, and CC 14.0% vs. 42.3%. CONCLUSION(S): Embryos exhibiting atypical phenotypes are highly prevalent in human embryos and show significantly lower developmental potential than control embryos. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01369446.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atypical phenotype; abnormal embryo development; embryo selection; embryo viability assessment; time-lapse microscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24726214     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  33 in total

1.  Abnormally cleaving embryos are able to produce live births: a time-lapse study.

Authors:  Yan Ling Fan; Shu Biao Han; Li Hong Wu; Ya Ping Wang; Guo Ning Huang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Polar body transfer restores the developmental potential of oocytes to blastocyst stage in a case of repeated embryo fragmentation.

Authors:  Shuo-Ping Zhang; Chang-Fu Lu; Fei Gong; Ping-Yuan Xie; Liang Hu; Shun-Ji Zhang; Guang-Xiu Lu; Ge Lin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go?

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Peter Kovacs; Wellington P Martins
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Chromosome constitution of equal-sized three-cell embryos using next-generation sequencing technology.

Authors:  Minyue Ma; Shihui Zhang; Chongzhao Lu; Shuling Wang; Yuanqing Yao; Hongmei Peng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Live birth rate and number of blastomeres on day 2 transfer.

Authors:  Antonino Azzarello; Thomas Hoest; Anders Hay-Schmidt; Anne Lis Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Blastulation of a zygote to a hatched blastocyst without any clear cell division: an observational finding in a time-lapse system after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  N L Sandi-Monroy; S Musanovic; D Zhu; K Eibner; N Reeka; J Koglin; K Bundschu; F Gagsteiger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Between-laboratory reproducibility of time-lapse embryo selection using qualitative and quantitative parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanhe Liu; Fang Qi; Phillip Matson; Dean E Morbeck; Ben W Mol; Sai Zhao; Masoud Afnan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Tripolar chromosome segregation drives the association between maternal genotype at variants spanning PLK4 and aneuploidy in human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy; Louise J Newnham; Christian S Ottolini; Eva R Hoffmann; Katerina Chatzimeletiou; Omar E Cornejo; Qiansheng Zhan; Nikica Zaninovic; Zev Rosenwaks; Dmitri A Petrov; Zachary P Demko; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Alan H Handyside
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study.

Authors:  Matthew D VerMilyea; Lei Tan; Joshua T Anthony; Joe Conaghan; Kristen Ivani; Marina Gvakharia; Robert Boostanfar; Valerie L Baker; Vaishali Suraj; Alice A Chen; Monica Mainigi; Christos Coutifaris; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 10.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.