Literature DB >> 27491644

Live birth rate and number of blastomeres on day 2 transfer.

Antonino Azzarello1, Thomas Hoest2, Anders Hay-Schmidt3, Anne Lis Mikkelsen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the presence of large fragment (LF) and abnormal cell divisions (ACDs) has influenced the correlation between live birth rate and number of blastomeres detected on day 2 by conventional scoring.
METHODS: This study included 578 embryos cultured in time lapse and selected for transfer by conventional scoring on day 2. By time-lapse recordings, embryos were reassessed to identify ACDs and/or LFs mistaken as blastomeres. The latter identifications were used to recalculate fragmentation rate and the number of blastomeres. Life birth rate according to number of blastomeres was compared in (a) embryos selected by conventional scoring and (b) embryos reassessed by time lapse.
RESULTS: After conventional scoring, embryos with four cells had a significantly higher pregnancy rate than embryos with less than four cells and embryos with more than four cells. By time-lapse assessment, ACDs and/or recalculated fragmentation >25 % was recognized in 106/578 (18.3 %) of transferred embryos. None of them resulted in a live birth. After exclusion of these embryos, the number of blastomeres on the day of transfer did not have any impact on life birth rate.
CONCLUSION: Conventional scoring on day 2 did not detect ACDs and LFs mistaken as blastomeres. LFs can lead to a recalculated fragmentation rate to >25 %. No significant correlation between live birth rate and number of blastomeres in day 2 embryos was observed when embryos with ACDs and fragmentation >25 % were excluded. Recognition of ACDs and fragmentation >25 % is more predictive of live birth than number of blastomeres.

Keywords:  Embryo; Fragmentation rate; Live birth; Number of blastomeres; Time lapse

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27491644      PMCID: PMC5065545          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0737-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  24 in total

Review 1.  A tense time for the nuclear envelope.

Authors:  John D Aitchison; Michael P Rout
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  There is a cutoff limit in diameter between a blastomere and a small anucleate fragment.

Authors:  Maria Johansson; Thorir Hardarson; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  National collection of embryo morphology data into Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere asymmetry, and live birth rate.

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Judy E Stern; William E Gibbons; Barry Behr; Kimball O Pomeroy; John D Biggers
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Cell cycle control and cancer.

Authors:  L H Hartwell; M B Kastan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Time-lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  K Kirkegaard; U S Kesmodel; J J Hindkjær; H J Ingerslev
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Traditional detection versus computer-controlled multilevel analysis of nuclear structures from donated human embryos.

Authors:  Christina Hnida; Inge Agerholm; Søren Ziebe
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The impact of pronuclei morphology and dynamicity on live birth outcome after time-lapse culture.

Authors:  A Azzarello; T Hoest; A L Mikkelsen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer--a review.

Authors:  D K Gardner; D Sakkas
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Reorganization of the nuclear envelope during open mitosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Kutay; Martin W Hetzer
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Joe Conaghan; Alice A Chen; Susan P Willman; Kristen Ivani; Philip E Chenette; Robert Boostanfar; Valerie L Baker; G David Adamson; Mary E Abusief; Marina Gvakharia; Kevin E Loewke; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.