Literature DB >> 24723551

Epidemiology of multiple congenital anomalies in Europe: a EUROCAT population-based registry study.

Elisa Calzolari1, Ingeborg Barisic, Maria Loane, Joan Morris, Diana Wellesley, Helen Dolk, Marie-Claude Addor, Larraitz Arriola, Fabrizio Bianchi, Amanda J Neville, Judith L S Budd, Kari Klungsoyr, Babak Khoshnood, Bob McDonnell, Vera Nelen, Annette Queisser-Luft, Judith Rankin, Anke Rissmann, Catherine Rounding, David Tucker, Christine Verellen-Dumoulin, Hermien de Walle, Ester Garne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study describes the prevalence, associated anomalies, and demographic characteristics of cases of multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) in 19 population-based European registries (EUROCAT) covering 959,446 births in 2004 and 2010.
METHODS: EUROCAT implemented a computer algorithm for classification of congenital anomaly cases followed by manual review of potential MCA cases by geneticists. MCA cases are defined as cases with two or more major anomalies of different organ systems, excluding sequences, chromosomal and monogenic syndromes.
RESULTS: The combination of an epidemiological and clinical approach for classification of cases has improved the quality and accuracy of the MCA data. Total prevalence of MCA cases was 15.8 per 10,000 births. Fetal deaths and termination of pregnancy were significantly more frequent in MCA cases compared with isolated cases (p < 0.001) and MCA cases were more frequently prenatally diagnosed (p < 0.001). Live born infants with MCA were more often born preterm (p < 0.01) and with birth weight < 2500 grams (p < 0.01). Respiratory and ear, face, and neck anomalies were the most likely to occur with other anomalies (34% and 32%) and congenital heart defects and limb anomalies were the least likely to occur with other anomalies (13%) (p < 0.01). However, due to their high prevalence, congenital heart defects were present in half of all MCA cases. Among males with MCA, the frequency of genital anomalies was significantly greater than the frequency of genital anomalies among females with MCA (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Although rare, MCA cases are an important public health issue, because of their severity. The EUROCAT database of MCA cases will allow future investigation on the epidemiology of these conditions and related clinical and diagnostic problems.
Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification; epidemiology; multiple congenital anomalies; prenatal diagnosis; prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24723551     DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


  16 in total

1.  ART results with frozen oocytes: data from the Italian ART registry (2005-2013).

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele P E Levi-Setti; Andrea Borini; Pasquale Patrizio; Simone Bolli; Vincenzo Vigiliano; Roberto De Luca; Giulia Scaravelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Array comparative genomic hybridization and genomic sequencing in the diagnostics of the causes of congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Krzysztof Szczałuba; Urszula Demkow
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  An epigenetic association of malformations, adverse reproductive outcomes, and fetal origins hypothesis related effects.

Authors:  Mark Lubinsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Co-occurring defect analysis: A platform for analyzing birth defect co-occurrence in registries.

Authors:  Renata H Benjamin; Xiao Yu; Maria Luisa Navarro Sanchez; Han Chen; Laura E Mitchell; Peter H Langlois; Mark A Canfield; Michael D Swartz; Angela E Scheuerle; Daryl A Scott; Hope Northrup; Christian P Schaaf; Joseph W Ray; Scott D McLean; Philip J Lupo; A J Agopian
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Sunayna Best; Karen Wou; Neeta Vora; Ignatia B Van der Veyver; Ronald Wapner; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Patterns of multiple congenital anomalies in the National Birth Defect Prevention Study: Challenges and insights.

Authors:  Meredith M Howley; Eva Williford; A J Agopian; Angela E Lin; Lorenzo D Botto; Christopher M Cunniff; Paul A Romitti; Eirini Nestoridi; Marilyn L Browne
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.661

7.  Estimating Global Burden of Disease due to congenital anomaly: an analysis of European data.

Authors:  Breidge Boyle; Marie-Claude Addor; Larraitz Arriola; Ingeborg Barisic; Fabrizio Bianchi; Melinda Csáky-Szunyogh; Hermien E K de Walle; Carlos Matias Dias; Elizabeth Draper; Miriam Gatt; Ester Garne; Martin Haeusler; Karin Källén; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Bob McDonnell; Carmel Mullaney; Vera Nelen; Amanda J Neville; Mary O'Mahony; Annette Queisser-Wahrendorf; Hanitra Randrianaivo; Judith Rankin; Anke Rissmann; Annukka Ritvanen; Catherine Rounding; David Tucker; Christine Verellen-Dumoulin; Diana Wellesley; Ben Wreyford; Natalia Zymak-Zakutnia; Helen Dolk
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 5.747

8.  Involvement of persons with lived experience of a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect: an explorative study to gain insights into perspectives on future research.

Authors:  Tommy Carlsson; Ulla Melander Marttala; Barbro Wadensten; Gunnar Bergman; Elisabet Mattsson
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-12-15

9.  Chromosomal Microarray Testing in 42 Korean Patients with Unexplained Developmental Delay, Intellectual Disability, Autism Spectrum Disorders, and Multiple Congenital Anomalies.

Authors:  Sun Ho Lee; Wung Joo Song
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2017-09-28

10.  Rapid whole exome sequencing in pregnancies to identify the underlying genetic cause in fetuses with congenital anomalies detected by ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Chantal Deden; Kornelia Neveling; Dimitra Zafeiropopoulou; Christian Gilissen; Rolph Pfundt; Tuula Rinne; Nicole de Leeuw; Brigitte Faas; Thatjana Gardeitchik; Suzanne C E H Sallevelt; Aimee Paulussen; Servi J C Stevens; Esther Sikkel; Mariet W Elting; Merel C van Maarle; Karin E M Diderich; Nicole Corsten-Janssen; Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Guus Lachmeijer; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Helger G Yntema; Marcel Nelen; Ilse Feenstra; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.