Literature DB >> 26676654

ART results with frozen oocytes: data from the Italian ART registry (2005-2013).

Paolo Emanuele P E Levi-Setti1, Andrea Borini2, Pasquale Patrizio3, Simone Bolli4, Vincenzo Vigiliano4, Roberto De Luca4, Giulia Scaravelli4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study is a retrospective collection of aggregated data from all the Italian ART centers reporting to the Italian National Register from cycles started between January 2005 and December 2013.
METHODS: Data from both slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (V) were assessed for the period 2007-2013, while during the years 2005-2006 cryopreservation was exclusively performed by SF.
RESULTS: In the study period, a total of 2,526,024 oocytes were retrieved (from 378,543 retrievals), of which 1,346,061 (53.3 %) were inseminated in fresh cycles and 214,481 (8.5 %) were cryopreserved. Cryopreserved oocytes were used in 24,173 cycles yielding 19,453 transfer cycles (80.5 % of the thawing/warming cycles) and 3043 clinical pregnancies (15.6 % per transfer). A significant difference in implantation (8.7 vs 12.9 % OR 1.30 CI 1.20-1.40) and pregnancy rates per transfer (12.2 vs 14.9 % OR 1.34 CI 1.23-1.46) was found between SF and V. Complete outcome data was available for 2708 pregnancies (89.8 %), leading to 1882 deliveries and 2152 live births. Neonatal major congenital anomalies were 0.9 % (20/2152).
CONCLUSIONS: A wide variation in pregnancy rates were found among different centers and lower rates were reported in donor cycles and in centers with more experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART registry; Congenital anomalies; Cumulative ART pregnancy rate; Oocyte freezing; Safety in ART

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26676654      PMCID: PMC4717137          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0629-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  31 in total

1.  Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes.

Authors:  E Porcu; R Fabbri; R Seracchioli; P M Ciotti; O Magrini; C Flamigni
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Birth after cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes.

Authors:  J F van Uem; E R Siebzehnrübl; B Schuh; R Koch; S Trotnow; N Lang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  C Chen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes does not increase embryonic aneuploidy.

Authors:  Kara N Goldman; Yael Kramer; Brooke Hodes-Wertz; Nicole Noyes; Caroline McCaffrey; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report.

Authors:  L Kuleshova; L Gianaroli; C Magli; A Ferraretti; A Trounson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess the chromosomal status of embryos obtained from cryopreserved oocytes.

Authors:  A Cobo; C Rubio; S Gerli; A Ruiz; A Pellicer; J Remohí
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Cryopreservation of supernumerary oocytes in IVF/ICSI cycles.

Authors:  P E Levi Setti; E Albani; P V Novara; A Cesana; G Morreale
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Pregnancies and births after oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Andrea Borini; Maria Antonietta Bonu; Giovanni Coticchio; Veronica Bianchi; Monica Cattoli; Carlo Flamigni
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Cryopreservation of human oocytes.

Authors:  S Al-Hasani; K Diedrich; H van der Ven; A Reinecke; M Hartje; D Krebs
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo development of human oocytes cryopreserved using 1,2-propanediol.

Authors:  D A Gook; M C Schiewe; S M Osborn; R H Asch; R P Jansen; W I Johnston
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  10 in total

1.  [Causes of oocyte vitrification and its value in assisted reproductive technology].

Authors:  Jing Zhe; Jun Zhang; Shiling Chen; Weiqing Zhang; Chen Luo; Xingyu Zhou; Xin Chen; Zhuolin Qiu; Huixi Li; Xiaomin Wu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-07-30

2.  Freeze/thaw stress induces organelle remodeling and membrane recycling in cryopreserved human mature oocytes.

Authors:  Stefania Annarita Nottola; Elena Albani; Giovanni Coticchio; Maria Grazia Palmerini; Caterina Lorenzo; Giulia Scaravelli; Andrea Borini; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Guido Macchiarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Federico Cirillo; Antonella Smeraldi; Emanuela Morenghi; Giulia E G Mulazzani; Elena Albani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Decision making processes of women who seek elective oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Ran Kim; Tae Ki Yoon; Inn Soo Kang; Mi Kyoung Koong; Yoo Shin Kim; Myung Joo Kim; Yubin Lee; Jayeon Kim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Cryopreservation of Mammalian Oocytes: Slow Cooling and Vitrification as Successful Methods for Cryogenic Storage.

Authors:  Victoria Keros; Barry J Fuller
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 6.  Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Clarisa Gracia; Roberta Maggiulli; Andrew R LaBarbera; Daniel J Kaser; Filippo M Ubaldi; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Contribution of cryopreservation to the cumulative live birth rate: a large multicentric cycle-based data analysis from the Italian National Registry.

Authors:  G Scaravelli; P E Levi-Setti; C Livi; G La Sala; F M Ubaldi; E Greco; M E Coccia; A Borini; A Revelli; G Ricci; V Vigiliano; R De Luca; S Bolli; L Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  An Update on Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation (POC) in Italy: Medical, Epidemiological and Legal Consideration.

Authors:  Jessica Cremonese; Marianna Marcon; Laura Oppi; Giulia Paletti; Vincenzo Romolo; Pamela Tozzo; Luciana Caenazzo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The Effect of Freezing Twice during Assisted Reproductive Technology on Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Ye Pan; Richao Wu; Ze Wang; Xiufang Li; Shanshan Gao; Yuhua Shi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Parenthood in Infertile Couples Attending Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) Centers: What Has Changed During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Gianmartin Cito; Chiara Pizzarelli; Vanessa Zurkirch; Valentina Basile; Maria Ruggiero; Maria Elisabetta Coccia; Pieraldo Inaudi; Paolo Rossi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.