Literature DB >> 28654730

Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing.

Sunayna Best1, Karen Wou2, Neeta Vora3, Ignatia B Van der Veyver4, Ronald Wapner2, Lyn S Chitty1,5.   

Abstract

Prenatal genetic diagnosis provides information for pregnancy and perinatal decision-making and management. In several small series, prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) approaches have identified genetic diagnoses when conventional tests (karyotype and microarray) were not diagnostic. Here, we review published prenatal WES studies and recent conference abstracts. Thirty-one studies were identified, with diagnostic rates in series of five or more fetuses varying between 6.2% and 80%. Differences in inclusion criteria and trio versus singleton approaches to sequencing largely account for the wide range of diagnostic rates. The data suggest that diagnostic yields will be greater in fetuses with multiple anomalies or in cases preselected following genetic review. Beyond its ability to improve diagnostic rates, we explore the potential of WES to improve understanding of prenatal presentations of genetic disorders and lethal fetal syndromes. We discuss prenatal phenotyping limitations, counselling challenges regarding variants of uncertain significance, incidental and secondary findings, and technical problems in WES. We review the practical, ethical, social and economic issues that must be considered before prenatal WES could become part of routine testing. Finally, we reflect upon the potential future of prenatal genetic diagnosis, including a move towards whole genome sequencing and non-invasive whole exome and whole genome testing.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28654730      PMCID: PMC5745303          DOI: 10.1002/pd.5102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  68 in total

1.  Prenatal whole-genome sequencing--is the quest to know a fetus's future ethical?

Authors:  Ilana R Yurkiewicz; Bruce R Korf; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Prenatal whole exome sequencing: the views of clinicians, scientists, genetic counsellors and patient representatives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones; Mark D Kilby; Sheila Greenfield; Michael Parker; Dominic McMullan; Matthew E Hurles; Sarah C Hillman
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants.

Authors:  Hutton M Kearney; Erik C Thorland; Kerry K Brown; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Sarah T South
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Clinical diagnosis by whole-genome sequencing of a prenatal sample.

Authors:  Michael E Talkowski; Zehra Ordulu; Vamsee Pillalamarri; Carol B Benson; Ian Blumenthal; Susan Connolly; Carrie Hanscom; Naveed Hussain; Shahrin Pereira; Jonathan Picker; Jill A Rosenfeld; Lisa G Shaffer; Louise E Wilkins-Haug; James F Gusella; Cynthia C Morton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Sarah S Kalia; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Wendy K Chung; Christine Eng; James P Evans; Gail E Herman; Sophia B Hufnagel; Teri E Klein; Bruce R Korf; Kent D McKelvey; Kelly E Ormond; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael Watson; Christa L Martin; David T Miller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  First applications of a targeted exome sequencing approach in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities reveals an important fraction of cases with associated gene defects.

Authors:  Constantinos Pangalos; Birgitta Hagnefelt; Konstantinos Lilakos; Christopher Konialis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing.

Authors:  Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-28

8.  Ketogenic diet in pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency: short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Kalliopi Sofou; Maria Dahlin; Tove Hallböök; Marie Lindefeldt; Gerd Viggedal; Niklas Darin
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.982

9.  Exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of structural fetal abnormalities revealed by ultrasound.

Authors:  Keren J Carss; Sarah C Hillman; Vijaya Parthiban; Dominic J McMullan; Eamonn R Maher; Mark D Kilby; Matthew E Hurles
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  De novo mutations in autosomal recessive congenital malformations.

Authors:  Holly A Black; David Parry; Santosh S Atanur; David Ross; Elaine Rose; Helen Russell; Sarah Stock; Jon Warner; Mary Porteous; Timothy J Aitman; Margaret J Evans
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  67 in total

1.  A head-to-head evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy and costs of trio versus singleton exome sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Tiong Yang Tan; Sebastian Lunke; Belinda Chong; Dean Phelan; Miriam Fanjul-Fernandez; Justine E Marum; Vanessa Siva Kumar; Zornitza Stark; Alison Yeung; Natasha J Brown; Chloe Stutterd; Martin B Delatycki; Simon Sadedin; Melissa Martyn; Ilias Goranitis; Natalie Thorne; Clara L Gaff; Susan M White
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of SNPs and Indels.

Authors:  Tom Rabinowitz; Noam Shomron
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Ethical and counseling challenges in prenatal exome sequencing.

Authors:  Sarah Harris; Kelly Gilmore; Emily Hardisty; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 4.  A system-based approach to the genetic etiologies of non-immune hydrops fetalis.

Authors:  Anne H Mardy; Shilpa P Chetty; Mary E Norton; Teresa N Sparks
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 6.  The current and future impact of genome-wide sequencing on fetal precision medicine.

Authors:  Riwa Sabbagh; Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Early Detection of Structural Anomalies in a Primary Care Setting in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Francesca Bardi; Eric Smith; Maja Kuilman; Rosalinde J M Snijders; Caterina Maddalena Bilardo
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.587

8.  Challenges in Diagnosing Rare Genetic Causes of Common In Utero Presentations: Report of Two Patients with Mucolipidosis Type II (I-Cell Disease).

Authors:  Gregory Costain; Michal Inbar-Feigenberg; Maha Saleh; Shimrit Yaniv-Salem; Greg Ryan; Eric Morgen; Elaine S Goh; Gen Nishimura; David Chitayat
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 9.  Prenatal genetic considerations of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT).

Authors:  Asha N Talati; Carolyn M Webster; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 10.  Whole Exome Sequencing: Applications in Prenatal Genetics.

Authors:  Angie C Jelin; Neeta Vora
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.