Literature DB >> 24720802

Words, shape, visual search and visual working memory in 3-year-old children.

Catarina Vales1, Linda B Smith.   

Abstract

Do words cue children's visual attention, and if so, what are the relevant mechanisms? Across four experiments, 3-year-old children (N = 163) were tested in visual search tasks in which targets were cued with only a visual preview versus a visual preview and a spoken name. The experiments were designed to determine whether labels facilitated search times and to examine one route through which labels could have their effect: By influencing the visual working memory representation of the target. The targets and distractors were pictures of instances of basic-level known categories and the labels were the common name for the target category. We predicted that the label would enhance the visual working memory representation of the target object, guiding attention to objects that better matched the target representation. Experiments 1 and 2 used conjunctive search tasks, and Experiment 3 varied shape discriminability between targets and distractors. Experiment 4 compared the effects of labels to repeated presentations of the visual target, which should also influence the working memory representation of the target. The overall pattern fits contemporary theories of how the contents of visual working memory interact with visual search and attention, and shows that even in very young children heard words affect the processing of visual information.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24720802      PMCID: PMC4213355          DOI: 10.1111/desc.12179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  57 in total

1.  Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 2.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; John Hodsoll; Pia Rotshtein; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Gianluca Campana
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Christian N L Olivers; Adelbert W Bronkhorst; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Timothy F Brady; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-08

6.  Categorization in 3- and 4-month-old infants: an advantage of words over tones.

Authors:  Alissa L Ferry; Susan J Hespos; Sandra R Waxman
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

7.  Blue car, red car: Developing efficiency in online interpretation of adjective-noun phrases.

Authors:  Anne Fernald; Kirsten Thorpe; Virginia A Marchman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Making the invisible visible: verbal but not visual cues enhance visual detection.

Authors:  Gary Lupyan; Michael J Spivey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets.

Authors:  Hyejin Yang; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with low working memory.

Authors:  Tracy Packiam Alloway; Susan Elizabeth Gathercole; Hannah Kirkwood; Julian Elliott
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The integrity of lexical acquisition mechanisms in autism spectrum disorders: A research review.

Authors:  Sudha Arunachalam; Rhiannon J Luyster
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.216

2.  Cultural differences in visual object recognition in 3-year-old children.

Authors:  Megumi Kuwabara; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-03-14

3.  Novel names extend for how long preschool children sample visual information.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Catarina Vales; Caitlin M Fausey; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-12-26

4.  When a word is worth more than a picture: Words lower the threshold for object identification in 3-year-old children.

Authors:  Catarina Vales; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-07-05

5.  Sustained selective attention predicts flexible switching in preschoolers.

Authors:  Viridiana L Benitez; Catarina Vales; Rima Hanania; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-12-24

6.  Change is hard: Individual differences in children's lexical processing and executive functions after a shift in dimensions.

Authors:  Ron Pomper; Margarita Kaushanskaya; Jenny Saffran
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2021-07-27

7.  Naming influences 9-month-olds' identification of discrete categories along a perceptual continuum.

Authors:  Mélanie Havy; Sandra R Waxman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-08-05

8.  Using language to get ready: Familiar labels help children engage proactive control.

Authors:  Sabine Doebel; John P Dickerson; Jerome D Hoover; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-09-14

Review 9.  Reproducibility and a unifying explanation: Lessons from the shape bias.

Authors:  Sarah C Kucker; Larissa K Samuelson; Lynn K Perry; Hanako Yoshida; Eliana Colunga; Megan G Lorenz; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2018-10-19

10.  The Development of Attention to Objects and Scenes: From Object-Biased to Unbiased.

Authors:  Kevin P Darby; Sophia W Deng; Dirk B Walther; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2020-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.