Literature DB >> 24716827

Developments in the correction of presbyopia II: surgical approaches.

W Neil Charman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To discuss the various static and dynamic surgical approaches which attempt to give presbyopes good vision at far, intermediate and near viewing distances. CONTENT: Static methods broadly adopt the same optical techniques as those used in presbyopic contact lens correction and aim to satisfy the needs of the presbyope by increasing binocular depth-of-focus, often using monovision as well as simultaneous-imagery. Dynamic methods generally attempt to make use of at least some of the still-active elements of the accommodation system. They include procedures which are supposed to modify the relative geometry of the ciliary muscle and lens, or which reduce the stiffness of the presbyopic lens either by replacing it with other natural or man-made material or by subjecting it to femtosecond laser treatment. Alternatively the natural lens may be replaced by some form of intraocular lens which changes power as a result of forces derived from the still-active ciliary muscle, zonule and capsule, or other sources.
CONCLUSIONS: At present, multifocal intraocular lenses appear to offer the most consistent and reliable surgical approach to surgical presbyopic correction. They have obvious advantages in convenience and stability over optically-similar, simultaneous-image presbyopic contact lenses but this must be balanced against their relative inflexibility in cases of patient dissatisfaction. Dynamic methods remain largely experimental. Although some approaches show promise, as yet no method has demonstrated a reliable, long-term ability to correct distance refractive error and to appropriately change ocular power in response to changes in viewing distance over the normal range of interest.
© 2014 The Author Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2014 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accommodating intraocular lenses; corneal presbyopic surgery; lens photodisruption; lens refilling; multifocal intraocular lenses; scleral procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24716827     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  34 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of pseudophakic monovision for presbyopia correction.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Aspa Toli; Aslin Perente; Panagiota Ntonti; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Perceived image quality with simulated segmented bifocal corrections.

Authors:  Carlos Dorronsoro; Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Pablo de Gracia; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Temporal multiplexing with adaptive optics for simultaneous vision.

Authors:  Eleni Papadatou; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Iván Marín-Franch; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Objective assessment of the effect of pupil size upon the power distribution of multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Eleni Papadatou; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; José J Esteve-Taboada; David Madrid-Costa; Alejandro Cerviño-Expósito
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Quantification of the ciliary muscle and crystalline lens interaction during accommodation with synchronous OCT imaging.

Authors:  Marco Ruggeri; Carolina de Freitas; Siobhan Williams; Victor M Hernandez; Florence Cabot; Nilufer Yesilirmak; Karam Alawa; Yu-Cherng Chang; Sonia H Yoo; Giovanni Gregori; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation in patients with monofocal intraocular lens in the contralateral eye.

Authors:  Jae Yong Kim; Yunhan Lee; Hun Jae Won; Hyerin Jeong; Jin Hyoung Park; Myoung Joon Kim; Hungwon Tchah
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Pre-operative simulation of post-operative multifocal vision.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Sara Aissati; Mercedes Romero; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Nuria Garzon; Francisco Poyales; Carlos Dorronsoro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  In vivo measurement of the attenuation coefficient of the sclera and ciliary muscle.

Authors:  Gabrielle Monterano Mesquita; Disha Patel; Yu-Cherng Chang; Florence Cabot; Marco Ruggeri; Sonia H Yoo; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie A Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  The Effect of Age, Accommodation, and Refractive Error on the Adult Human Eye.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Mark A Bullimore; Loraine T Sinnott; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Achromatic doublet intraocular lens for full aberration correction.

Authors:  Enrique J Fernandez; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.