Literature DB >> 28730093

A systematic review of pseudophakic monovision for presbyopia correction.

Georgios Labiris1,2, Aspa Toli2, Aslin Perente2, Panagiota Ntonti2, Vassilios P Kozobolis1,2.   

Abstract

A systematic review of the recent literature regarding pseudophakic monovision as a reliable methods for presbyopia correction was performed based on the PubMed, MEDLINE, Nature and the American Academy of Ophthalmology databases in July 2015 and data from 18 descriptive and 12 comparative studies were included in this narrative review. Pseudophakic monosvision seems to be an effective method for presbyopia with high rates of spectacles independence and minimal dysphotopsia side-effects, that should be considered by the modern cataract surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract extraction; lens implantation; mini-monovision; monofocal intraocular lens; presbyopia correction; pseudophakic monovision

Year:  2017        PMID： 28730093      PMCID： PMC5515155          DOI： 10.18240/ijo.2017.06.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN： 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  32 in total

1.  Conductive keratoplasty for symptomatic presbyopia following monofocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Panpan Ye; Wen Xu; Xiajing Tang; Ke Yao; Zhaochun Li; Hesheng Xu; Junting Shi
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  Binocular visual function of modified pseudophakic monovision.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Soichiro Ogawa; Shin-Ichi Manabe; Koichi Yoshimura
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Pseudophakic monovision: optimal distribution of refractions.

Authors:  Kristian Naeser; Jesper Ø Hjortdal; William F Harris
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Optimal amount of anisometropia for pseudophakic monovision.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Motoaki Yoshida; Shin-Ichi Manabe; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  George H H Beiko
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Reading ability with pseudophakic monovision and with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: comparative study.

Authors:  Misae Ito; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  [Comparison study of visual function and patient satisfaction in patients with monovision and patients with bilateral multifocal intraocular lenses].

Authors:  Jing Mu; Hui Chen; Yizhuang Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2014-02

8.  Patient satisfaction and visual function after pseudophakic monovision.

Authors:  Yaron M Finkelman; Jonathon Q Ng; Graham D Barrett
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Evaluation of visual performance and patient satisfaction with pseudophakic monovision technique.

Authors:  Frederico França Marques; Ricardo Mitsuo Sato; Brenda Biagio Chiacchio; Daniela Meira Villano Marques; Jeferson Barreiro; Renato Lucio Caetano
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.872

Review 10.  Pseudophakic monovision is an important surgical approach to being spectacle-free.

Authors:  Jianhe Xiao; Caihui Jiang; Maonian Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848
View more
  5 in total

1.  Premium Monovision versus Bilateral Myopic Monovision, Hybrid Monovision and Bilateral Trifocal Implantation: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Asli Perente; Panagiota Ntonti; Konstantinos Delibasis; Ioannis Fotiadis; Aristeidis Konstantinidis; Doukas Dardabounis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-04

2.  Pseudophakic mini-monovision: high patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost.

Authors:  Debora Goetz Goldberg; Michael H Goldberg; Riddhi Shah; Jane N Meagher; Haresh Ailani
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Psychophysical Tests Do Not Identify Ocular Dominance Consistently.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Eli Peli
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-04-29

Review 4.  Pharmacological Treatment in Presbyopia.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Varis Ruamviboonsuk
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  A Review of Pharmacological Presbyopia Treatment.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Agne Markeviciute; Reda Zemaitiene
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2020 May-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.