Kathryn Richdale1, Mark A Bullimore, Loraine T Sinnott, Karla Zadnik. 1. *OD, PhD, FAAO †MCOptom, PhD, FAAO ‡PhD SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York (KR); University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas (MAB); and The Ohio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio (LTS, KZ).
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantify changes in ocular dimensions associated with age, refractive error, and accommodative response, in vivo, in 30- to 50-year-old human subjects. METHODS: The right eyes of 91 adults were examined using ultrasonography, phakometry, keratometry, pachymetry, interferometry, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Accommodation was measured subjectively with a push-up test and objectively using open-field autorefraction. Regression analyses were used to assess differences in ocular parameters with age, refractive error, and accommodation. RESULTS: With age, crystalline lens thickness increased (0.03 mm/yr), anterior lens curvature steepened (0.11 mm/yr), anterior chamber depth decreased (0.02 mm/yr), and lens equivalent refractive index decreased (0.001/yr) (all p < 0.01). With increasing myopia, there were significant increases in axial length (0.37 mm/D), vitreous chamber depth (0.34 mm/D), vitreous chamber height (0.09 mm/D), and ciliary muscle ring diameter (0.10 mm/D) (all p < 0.05). Increasing myopia was also associated with steepening of both the cornea (0.16 mm/D) and anterior lens surface (0.011 mm/D) (both p < 0.04). With accommodation, the ciliary muscle ring diameter decreased (0.08 mm/D) and the muscle thinned posteriorly (0.008 mm/D), allowing the lens to shorten equatorially (0.07 mm/D) and thicken axially (0.06 mm/D) (all p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Refractive error is significantly correlated with not only the axial dimensions but also the anterior equatorial dimension of the adult eye. Further testing and development of accommodating intraocular lenses should account for differences in patients' preoperative refractive error.
PURPOSE: To quantify changes in ocular dimensions associated with age, refractive error, and accommodative response, in vivo, in 30- to 50-year-old human subjects. METHODS: The right eyes of 91 adults were examined using ultrasonography, phakometry, keratometry, pachymetry, interferometry, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Accommodation was measured subjectively with a push-up test and objectively using open-field autorefraction. Regression analyses were used to assess differences in ocular parameters with age, refractive error, and accommodation. RESULTS: With age, crystalline lens thickness increased (0.03 mm/yr), anterior lens curvature steepened (0.11 mm/yr), anterior chamber depth decreased (0.02 mm/yr), and lens equivalent refractive index decreased (0.001/yr) (all p < 0.01). With increasing myopia, there were significant increases in axial length (0.37 mm/D), vitreous chamber depth (0.34 mm/D), vitreous chamber height (0.09 mm/D), and ciliary muscle ring diameter (0.10 mm/D) (all p < 0.05). Increasing myopia was also associated with steepening of both the cornea (0.16 mm/D) and anterior lens surface (0.011 mm/D) (both p < 0.04). With accommodation, the ciliary muscle ring diameter decreased (0.08 mm/D) and the muscle thinned posteriorly (0.008 mm/D), allowing the lens to shorten equatorially (0.07 mm/D) and thicken axially (0.06 mm/D) (all p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Refractive error is significantly correlated with not only the axial dimensions but also the anterior equatorial dimension of the adult eye. Further testing and development of accommodating intraocular lenses should account for differences in patients' preoperative refractive error.
Authors: Sanjeev Kasthurirangan; Emma L Markwell; David A Atchison; James M Pope Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kathryn Richdale; Loraine T Sinnott; Mark A Bullimore; Peter A Wassenaar; Petra Schmalbrock; Chiu-Yen Kao; Samuel Patz; Donald O Mutti; Adrian Glasser; Karla Zadnik Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: José J Esteve-Taboada; Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Daniel Monsálvez-Romín; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Robert Montés-Micó Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Aikaterini I Moulakaki; Daniel Monsálvez-Romín; Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; José J Esteve-Taboada; Robert Montés-Micó Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Adnan Khan; James M Pope; Pavan K Verkicharla; Marwan Suheimat; David A Atchison Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Michael A Bergen; Han Na Park; Ranjay Chakraborty; Erica G Landis; Curran Sidhu; Li He; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Daniel Monsálvez-Romín; José J Esteve-Taboada; Robert Montés-Micó; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco Journal: J Optom Date: 2018-04-04