| Literature DB >> 24715656 |
Timothy Charles Ryken1, Nafi Aygun, Johnathan Morris, Marin Schweizer, Rajeshwari Nair, Cassandra Spracklen, Steven N Kalkanis, Jeffrey J Olson.
Abstract
QUESTION: Which imaging techniques most accurately differentiate true tumor progression from pseudo-progression or treatment related changes in patients with previously diagnosed glioblastoma? TARGET POPULATION: These recommendations apply to adults with previously diagnosed glioblastoma who are suspected of experiencing progression of the neoplastic process. RECOMMENDATIONS LEVEL II: Magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement is recommended as the imaging surveillance method to detect the progression of previously diagnosed glioblastoma. LEVEL II: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is recommended as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma. LEVEL III: The routine use of positron emission tomography to identify progression of glioblastoma is not recommended. LEVEL III: Single-photon emission computed tomography imaging is recommended as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24715656 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1330-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurooncol ISSN: 0167-594X Impact factor: 4.130