Literature DB >> 9973209

2-[C-11]thymidine imaging of malignant brain tumors.

J F Eary1, D A Mankoff, A M Spence, M S Berger, A Olshen, J M Link, F O'Sullivan, K A Krohn.   

Abstract

Malignant brain tumors pose diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Despite the advent of new brain imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), determination of tumor viability and response to treatment is often difficult. Blood-brain barrier disruption can be caused by tumor or nonspecific reactions to treatment, making MRI interpretation ambiguous. The high metabolic background of the normal brain and its regional variability makes it difficult to identify small or less active tumors by FDG imaging of cellular energetics. We have investigated 2-[C-11]thymidine (dThd) and PET to image the rate of brain tumor cellular proliferation. A series of 13 patients underwent closely spaced dThd PET, FDG PET, and MRI procedures, and the image results were compared by standardized visual analysis. The resulting dThd scans were qualitatively different from the other two scans in approximately 50% of the cases, which suggests that dThd provided information distinct from FDG PET and MRI. In two cases, recurrent tumor was more apparent on the dThd study than on FDG; in two other patients, tumor dThd uptake was less than FDG uptake, and these patients had slower tumor progression than the three patients with both high dThd and FDG uptake. To better characterize tumor proliferation, kinetic modeling was applied to dynamic dThd PET uptake data and metabolite-analyzed blood data in a subset of patients. Kinetic analysis was able to remove the confounding influence of [C-11]CO2, the principal labeled metabolite of 2-[C-11]dThd, and to estimate the flux of dThd incorporation into DNA. Sequential, same-day [C-11]CO2 and [C-11]dThd imaging demonstrated the ability of kinetic analysis to model both dThd and CO2 simultaneously. Images of dThd flux obtained using the model along with the mixture analysis method for pixel-by-pixel parametric imaging significantly enhanced the contrast of tumor compared with normal brain. Comparison of model estimates of dThd transport versus dThd flux was able to discern increased dThd uptake simply on the basis of blood-brain barrier disruption retention on the basis of increased cellular proliferation. This preliminary study demonstrates the potential for imaging brain tumor cellular proliferation to provide unique information for guiding patient treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9973209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  25 in total

Review 1.  Characterizing tumors using metabolic imaging: PET imaging of cellular proliferation and steroid receptors.

Authors:  D A Mankoff; F Dehdashti; A F Shields
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography (PET): expanding the horizons of oncology drug development.

Authors:  Lisa A Hammond; Louis Denis; Umber Salman; Paul Jerabek; Charles R Thomas; John G Kuhn
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  Use of positron emission tomography in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Eric O Aboagye; Patricia M Price
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  A novel approach to assess the treatment response using Gaussian random field in PET.

Authors:  Mengdie Wang; Ning Guo; Guangshu Hu; Georges El Fakhri; Hui Zhang; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  [18F]FLT-PET in oncology: current status and opportunities.

Authors:  Lukas B Been; Albert J H Suurmeijer; David C P Cobben; Pieter L Jager; Harald J Hoekstra; Philip H Elsinga
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  [Molecular imaging with new PET tracers].

Authors:  A J Beer; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Review of functional/anatomical imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Stephanie N Histed; Maria L Lindenberg; Esther Mena; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Karen A Kurdziel
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.690

8.  [18F]3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors.

Authors:  Seung Jin Choi; Jae Seung Kim; Jeong Hoon Kim; Seung Jun Oh; Jeong Gyo Lee; Chang Jin Kim; Young Shin Ra; Jeong Seok Yeo; Jin Sook Ryu; Dae Hyuk Moon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Potential impact of [18F]3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine versus [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in positron emission tomography for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D L Francis; D Visvikis; D C Costa; T H A Arulampalam; C Townsend; S K Luthra; I Taylor; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography measurement of tumor metabolism and growth: its expanding role in oncology.

Authors:  Anthony F Shields
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.