Literature DB >> 32348798

Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Rongrong Hu1, Lyne Racette2, Kelly S Chen3, Chris A Johnson4.   

Abstract

Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, evaluating which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and nonparametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analysis methods; clinical considerations; glaucoma; perimetric tests; visual field progression

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32348798      PMCID: PMC7423736          DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  198 in total

1.  On alternative methods for measuring visual field decay: Tobit linear regression.

Authors:  Richard A Russell; David P Crabb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparison of rates of change between binocular and monocular visual fields.

Authors:  Yeoun Sook Chun; Jae-Ho Shin; In Ki Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Pointwise rates of visual field progression cluster according to retinal nerve fiber layer bundles.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Dennis Mock; Hamid Hosseini; Elena Bitrian; Fei Yu; Abdelmonem Afifi; Anne L Coleman; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Glaucoma Progression Analysis software compared with expert consensus opinion in the detection of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  Angelo P Tanna; Donald L Budenz; Jagadeesh Bandi; William J Feuer; Robert M Feldman; Leon W Herndon; Douglas J Rhee; Julia Whiteside-de Vos; Joyce Huang; Douglas R Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Sharon A Haymes; Donna M Hutchison; Terry A McCormick; Devesh K Varma; Marcelo T Nicolela; Raymond P LeBlanc; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study.

Authors:  Stefano Miglior; Thierry Zeyen; Norbert Pfeiffer; Jose Cunha-Vaz; Valter Torri; Ingrid Adamsons
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; D P Crabb; A I McNaught; M C Westcott; D Kamal; D F Garway-Heath; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Visual field progression in glaucoma: estimating the overall significance of deterioration with permutation analyses of pointwise linear regression (PoPLR).

Authors:  Neil O'Leary; Balwantray C Chauhan; Paul H Artes
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  Short-wavelength automated perimetry.

Authors:  Lyne Racette; Pamela A Sample
Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-06

10.  A Statistical Model to Analyze Clinician Expert Consensus on Glaucoma Progression using Spatially Correlated Visual Field Data.

Authors:  Joshua L Warren; Jean-Claude Mwanza; Angelo P Tanna; Donald L Budenz
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.283

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluating Visual Field Progression in Advanced Glaucoma Using Trend Analysis of Targeted Mean Total Deviation.

Authors:  Atsuya Miki; Tomoyuki Okazaki; Robert N Weinreb; Misa Morota; Aki Tanimura; Rumi Kawashima; Shinichi Usui; Kenji Matsushita; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A deep-learning system predicts glaucoma incidence and progression using retinal photographs.

Authors:  Fei Li; Yuandong Su; Fengbin Lin; Zhihuan Li; Yunhe Song; Sheng Nie; Jie Xu; Linjiang Chen; Shiyan Chen; Hao Li; Kanmin Xue; Huixin Che; Zhengui Chen; Bin Yang; Huiying Zhang; Ming Ge; Weihui Zhong; Chunman Yang; Lina Chen; Fanyin Wang; Yunqin Jia; Wanlin Li; Yuqing Wu; Yingjie Li; Yuanxu Gao; Yong Zhou; Kang Zhang; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 19.456

3.  Evaluation of the external validity of a joint structure-function model for monitoring glaucoma progression.

Authors:  Sampson Listowell Abu; Mahmoud Tawfik KhalafAllah; Lyne Racette
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The Usefulness of Assessing Glaucoma Progression With Postprocessed Visual Field Data.

Authors:  Sampson L Abu; Shervonne Poleon; Lyne Racette
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.048

5.  Pointwise and Region-Wise Course of Visual Field Loss in Patients With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Samaneh Sabouri; Saeedeh Pourahmad; Koenraad A Vermeer; Hans G Lemij; Siamak Yousefi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  Glaucoma Progression Diagnosis: The Agreement between Clinical Judgment and Statistical Software.

Authors:  Gloria Roberti; Manuele Michelessi; Lucia Tanga; Luca Belfonte; Laura Maria Del Grande; Marisa Bruno; Francesco Oddone
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Reasons why OCT Global Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness is a Poor Measure of Glaucomatous Progression.

Authors:  Melvi D Eguia; Emmanouil Tsamis; Zane Z Zemborain; Ashley Sun; Joseph Percival; C Gustavo De Moraes; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.