Literature DB >> 24710757

The effect of metal artefact reduction on CT-based attenuation correction for PET imaging in the vicinity of metallic hip implants: a phantom study.

Roy Harnish1, Sven Prevrhal, Abass Alavi, Habib Zaidi, Thomas F Lang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine if metal artefact reduction (MAR) combined with a priori knowledge of prosthesis material composition can be applied to obtain CT-based attenuation maps with sufficient accuracy for quantitative assessment of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in lesions near metallic prostheses.
METHODS: A custom hip prosthesis phantom with a lesion-sized cavity filled with 0.2 ml (18)F-FDG solution having an activity of 3.367 MBq adjacent to a prosthesis bore was imaged twice with a chrome-cobalt steel hip prosthesis and a plastic replica, respectively. Scanning was performed on a clinical hybrid PET/CT system equipped with an additional external (137)Cs transmission source. PET emission images were reconstructed from both phantom configurations with CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) and with CT-based attenuation correction using MAR (MARCTAC). To compare results with the attenuation-correction method extant prior to the advent of PET/CT, we also carried out attenuation correction with (137)Cs transmission-based attenuation correction (TXAC). CTAC and MARCTAC images were scaled to attenuation coefficients at 511 keV using a trilinear function that mapped the highest CT values to the prosthesis alloy attenuation coefficient. Accuracy and spatial distribution of the lesion activity was compared between the three reconstruction schemes.
RESULTS: Compared to the reference activity of 3.37 MBq, the estimated activity quantified from the PET image corrected by TXAC was 3.41 MBq. The activity estimated from PET images corrected by MARCTAC was similar in accuracy at 3.32 MBq. CTAC corrected PET images resulted in nearly 40 % overestimation of lesion activity at 4.70 MBq. Comparison of PET images obtained with the plastic and metal prostheses in place showed that CTAC resulted in a marked distortion of the (18)F-FDG distribution within the lesion, whereas application of MARCTAC and TXAC resulted in lesion distributions similar to those observed with the plastic replica.
CONCLUSIONS: MAR combined with a trilinear CT number mapping for PET attenuation correction resulted in estimates of lesion activity comparable in accuracy to that obtained with (137)Cs transmission-based attenuation correction, and far superior to estimates made without attenuation correction or with a standard CT attenuation map. The ability to use CT images for attenuation correction is a potentially important development because it obviates the need for a (137)Cs transmission source, which entails extra scan time, logistical complexity and expense.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24710757      PMCID: PMC4101148          DOI: 10.1007/s12149-014-0844-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  32 in total

Review 1.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Bruce H Hasegawa; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  A pragmatic approach to metal artifact reduction in CT: merging of metal artifact reduced images.

Authors:  Oliver Watzke; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  CT metal artifact reduction method correcting for beam hardening and missing projections.

Authors:  Joost M Verburg; Joao Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Should national standards for reporting surgical site infections distinguish between primary and revision orthopedic surgeries?

Authors:  Surbhi Leekha; Priya Sampathkumar; Daniel J Berry; Rodney L Thompson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip.

Authors:  Timothy Chryssikos; Javad Parvizi; Elie Ghanem; Andrew Newberg; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  MR-driven metal artifact reduction in PET/CT.

Authors:  G Delso; S Wollenweber; A Lonn; F Wiesinger; P Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Optimization of a fully 3D single scatter simulation algorithm for 3D PET.

Authors:  Roberto Accorsi; Lars-Eric Adam; Matthew E Werner; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  The reduction of artifacts due to metal hip implants in CT-attenuation corrected PET images from hybrid PET/CT scanners.

Authors:  John A Kennedy; Ora Israel; Alex Frenkel; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Haim Azhari
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.079

9.  Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device.

Authors:  Siroos Mirzaei; Michel Guerchaft; Christopher Bonnier; Peter Knoll; Michel Doat; Peter Braeutigam
Journal:  BMC Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06-14

10.  The CT number accuracy of a novel commercial metal artifact reduction algorithm for large orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Guido Hilgers; Tonnis Nuver; André Minken
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  2022 ASNC/AAPM/SCCT/SNMMI guideline for the use of CT in hybrid nuclear/CT cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Timothy M Bateman; Kelley R Branch; Andrew Crean; Eric L Gingold; Randall C Thompson; Sarah E McKenney; Edward J Miller; Venkatesh L Murthy; Koen Nieman; Todd C Villines; Michael V Yester; Andrew J Einstein; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Value of CT iterative metal artifact reduction in PET/CT-clinical evaluation in 100 patients.

Authors:  Christian Philipp Reinert; Christian la Fougère; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Pfannenberg; Sergios Gatidis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.