A novel trifluorinated cholic acid derivative, CA-lys-TFA, was designed and synthesized for use as a tool to measure bile acid transport noninvasively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the present study, the in vivo performance of CA-lys-TFA for measuring bile acid transport by MRI was investigated in mice. Gallbladder CA-lys-TFA content was quantified using MRI and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Results in wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice were compared to those in mice lacking expression of Asbt, the ileal bile acid transporter. (19)F signals emanating from the gallbladders of WT mice 7 h after oral gavage with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA were reproducibly detected by MRI. Asbt-deficient mice administered the same dose had undetectable (19)F signals by MRI, and gallbladder bile CA-lys-TFA levels were 30-fold lower compared to WT animals. To our knowledge, this represents the first report of in vivo imaging of an orally absorbed drug using (19)F MRI. Fluorinated bile acid analogues have potential as tools to measure and detect abnormal bile acid transport by MRI.
A novel trifluorinatedcholic acid derivative, CA-lys-TFA, was designed and synthesized for use as a tool to measure bile acid transport noninvasively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the present study, the in vivo performance of CA-lys-TFA for measuring bile acid transport by MRI was investigated in mice. Gallbladder CA-lys-TFA content was quantified using MRI and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Results in wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice were compared to those in mice lacking expression of Asbt, the ileal bile acid transporter. (19)F signals emanating from the gallbladders of WT mice 7 h after oral gavage with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA were reproducibly detected by MRI. Asbt-deficient mice administered the same dose had undetectable (19)F signals by MRI, and gallbladder bile CA-lys-TFA levels were 30-fold lower compared to WT animals. To our knowledge, this represents the first report of in vivo imaging of an orally absorbed drug using (19)F MRI. Fluorinated bile acid analogues have potential as tools to measure and detect abnormal bile acid transport by MRI.
Together with their
classical function as detergents facilitating
fat absorption, bile acids have emerged as signaling molecules targeting
multiple organs in addition to those associated with their synthesis
and enterohepatic cycling.[1,2] Bile acids are synthesized
in the liver, stored in the gallbladder, and released into the gut
with eating. Although passive absorption occurs throughout the gut,
the ileal apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT, encoded
by SLC10A2) is a key mediator accounting for ∼95%
of intestinal bile acid uptake. In Asbt-deficient (Slc10a2) mice, bile acid absorption
is severely impaired, the bile acid pool size is reduced, and excretion
of bile acids into the feces is increased.[3]Bile acid composition and distribution in anatomical compartments
are tightly regulated but can be modulated by factors that alter hepatic
synthesis and intestinal uptake (e.g., diet, surgery, antibiotic use,
and changes in gut flora). Clinical manifestations of bile acid malabsorption
(BAM), particularly chronic diarrhea, are thought to result from excess
passage of bile acids into the colon due to inadequate absorption
in the small intestine. Emerging literature indicates that BAM is
underdiagnosed or, more commonly, misdiagnosed as diarrhea-predominant
irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); it is estimated that 30–50%
of persons with unexplained chronic diarrhea have BAM.[4−7] BAM may result from identifiable causes such as ileal resection,
radiation injury, Crohn’s disease, or rare dysfunctional mutations
in the ASBT gene,[8,9] but in most cases the cause of
BAM is not readily apparent. Recently, it has been suggested that
BAM may result from overproduction of bile acids in the liver as a
consequence of reduced ileal expression and release of fibroblast
growth factor (FGF)-19, a physiological feedback inhibitor of bile
acid synthesis.[10] In this setting unrestricted
hepatic synthesis raises intestinal bile acid concentrations to levels
exceeding ASBT transport capacity, thus increasing fecal bile acid
levels.Current approaches to diagnose BAM are limited.[11] Although native and radiolabeled fecal bile
acid concentrations
can be measured,[12] such assays are time-consuming,
not readily available, and expensive. In selected European countries,
a 75Se-labeled synthetic bile acid, 75Se-HCAT,
is available to measure bile acid transport in vivo using a gamma camera.[13]75Se-HCAT testing, which emits low levels of ionizing radiation, is
not approved for clinical use in the United States, where BAM is most
commonly diagnosed by evaluating the response to a therapeutic trial
of bile acid sequestrants.[11,14] However, bile acid
sequestrants, which are not approved for this use by the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration, are generally unpalatable, reduce bioavailability
of coadministered medicines, and require varying doses across patients.
Moreover, diagnosis of BAM using a therapeutic trial of bile acid
sequestrants is reported to have a high false-negative rate.[7] Measuring serum levels of FGF-19 or 7-α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one
(C4), a byproduct of hepatic bile acid synthesis, has been proposed
to diagnose BAM, but these assays require additional clinical validation
and are not readily available.[11]Collectively, these considerations identify the need for innovative
approaches to assess bile acid transport in vivo.
To address this need we sought to develop an accurate, safe, noninvasive,
reproducible method of diagnosing abnormal bile acid disposition or
transport without the use of ionizing radiation. With the goal of
assessing bile acid transport in vivo using 19F magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we synthesized a trifluorinatedcholic acid derivative, CA-lys-TFA.[15]19F is the naturally occurring stable isotope of fluorine and
does not suffer from major limitations associated with use of the
positron emission tomography (PET) isotope 18F; its radioactivity,
difficult handling and very short half-life. For MRI, 19F sensitivity is second only to that of 1H, but, unlike
body water detected by 1H MRI, there are no competing 19F background signals.[16] Because 19F MRI signal strength is proportional to the number of equivalent
fluorine atoms in a molecule,[17] it is potentially
well suited for in vivo drug tracking. We previously
showed that CA-lys-TFA is a potent in vitro substrate
for both ASBT and Na+/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP),
the key hepatic bile acid uptake transporter.[15] Moreover, CA-lys-TFA demonstrated in vitro chemical
and enzyme stability and, after oral gavage, concentrated in gallbladders
of fasted mice.[15]In vitro19F MRI showed that 19F signals emanating
from CA-lys-TFA varied in proportion to its concentration.[15]The present study was designed to explore
the feasibility of using
CA-lys-TFA as a probe to assess bile acid transport using in vivo19F MRI. The objective was to compare
the in vivo imaging performance of CA-lys-TFA with
direct measurement of CA-lys-TFA in bile obtained from gallbladders
harvested from C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and Asbt-deficient mice.
Experimental
Section
CA-lys-TFA Structure and MRI Standard Curve
CA-lys-TFA,
a conjugate of trifluoroacetyl l-lysine and the native human
primary bile acidcholic acid (Figure 1), was
synthesized as described previously.[15] To
ensure that a single signal peak was obtained from three equivalent
fluorine atoms in CA-lys-TFA, 19F MR spectroscopy was performed.
A Varian INOVA 500 MHz NMR machine (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara,
California, USA) was used to analyze CA-lys-TFA in deuterated methanol
at 25 °C.
Figure 1
CA-lys-TFA chemical structure. The probe compound is a
trifluorinated
derivative of cholic acid, formed by conjugating cholic acid to trifluoroacetyl l-lysine.
CA-lys-TFA chemical structure. The probe compound is a
trifluorinated
derivative of cholic acid, formed by conjugating cholic acid to trifluoroacetyl l-lysine.Previously, CA-lys-TFA
was imaged in vitro using
a 19F surface coil.[15] With a
surface coil, signal intensity decreases with distance from the coil;
this is not the case when using a volume coil. Hence, in the present
work, to ensure equivalent 19F signals in the entire anatomical
area imaged, a 19F volume coil was used (Bruker Biosciences
Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA). A standard curve was
generated by imaging phantoms that consisted of 0, 10, 20, and 30
mM CA-lys-TFA dissolved in methanol in 2 mL glass vials (12 mm diameter,
National Scientific, Rockwood, Tennessee, USA).
Animals
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance
with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.[18] Both the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at
the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Research and
Development Committee at the VA Maryland Health Care System approved
the mouse experiments. Mice were housed under identical conditions
in a pathogen-free environment with a 12:12 h light/dark cycle and
free access to standard mouse chow and water prior to treatment.Two mouse experiments were performed. In the first experiment, 14
mice underwent oral gavage with CA-lys-TFA; 10 mice were subjected
to both MRI- and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)-based
quantification of CA-lys-TFA in the gallbladder. In contrast, mice
11–14 were only evaluated by LC/MS/MS-based quantification.
In the second mouse experiment, WT and Asbt-deficient (Slc10a2) mice underwent gavage
with CA-lys-TFA (n = 5 mice per group) and were subjected
to either MRI- or LC/MS/MS-based quantification of CA-lys-TFA in the
gallbladder.
In Vivo Imaging of CA-lys-TFA
Ten
male C57BL/6J mice (average age 9.9 weeks, average weight 24.3 g)
were obtained from Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA. Seven
mice were fasted overnight and underwent oral gavage with 150 mg/kg
CA-lys-TFA in 1:1 polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400:Dulbecco’s
phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) vehicle. These mice were maintained
in the fasted state and imaged either 2 (mice 1–3) or 7 h (mice
4–7) after gavage. Following another overnight fast, mice 2
and 6 were reimaged 48 h after gavage. Mice 8–10 underwent
oral gavage with 50 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA in vehicle once daily for 7 days,
and were imaged on the seventh day either 2 (mouse 8) or 7 h (mice
9–10) after overnight fasting and final gavage. Previously,
we reported that isoflurane, a commonly used anesthetic agent for
small-animal MRI, accumulates in the gallbladder in quantities detectable
by 19F MRI.[20] Hence, to avoid
acquisition of a competing 19F signal isoflurane was not
used to anesthetize mice for MRI. Instead, mice were anesthetized
with ketamine/xylazine administered via an intraperitoneal (IP) catheter
placed before imaging; maintenance doses of ketamine/xylazine were
infused every 30 min during imaging. Generally, imaging required 0.5
h for 1H signal acquisition and 1.5 h for 19F signal acquisition, approximately 2 h of MRI for each mouse.After MRI, mice were euthanized by the injection of additional ketamine/xylazine
and exsanguination by intracardiac puncture, and the liver and gallbladder
were harvested. CA-lys-TFA concentrations in these organs were determined
using LC/MS/MS as described below. Blood was collected in heparinized
tubes and centrifuged at 2000g for 15 min, and supernatants
were precipitated with four parts acetonitrile. Supernatants were
centrifuged at 12000g for 10 min and analyzed by LC/MS/MS. Whole liver
and gallbladder were homogenized on ice in a Duall size-21 glass tissue
homogenizer (Kimble Chase Life Science, Vineland, New Jersey, USA),
extracted with 75% acetonitrile and 25% water (800 μL for liver,
300 μL for gallbladder), and centrifuged at 12000g for 10 min. Gallbladder extracts were diluted 1000-fold and then
quantified by LC/MS/MS.For mice 8–10, to determine if
repetitive 7-day dosing of
50 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA caused tissue injury, sections of liver, stomach,
and small intestine were resected and placed in 10% formalin for histological
analysis. Unlike single-dose 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA,[15] histological examination of relevant abdominal organs had
not been performed previously following a repetitive dosing regimen.
Tissues were fixed in formalin for three days, transferred to 70%
ethanol in water, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
for microscopic examination by a senior gastrointestinal pathologist.To determine if mouse handling after MRI altered gallbladder concentrations
of CA-lys-TFA quantified by LC/MS/MS analysis, four additional C57BL/6J
male mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (mice 11–14,
average age 17.4 weeks, average weight 29.6 g) and fasted overnight,
and they underwent oral gavage with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA. These mice
were maintained in the fasted state and euthanized 8.5 h after gavage
without undergoing MRI.
Small Animal MRI
All in
vitro and in vivo1H and 19F MRI experiments
were performed using a Bruker BioSpec 70/30USR Avance III 7T horizontal
bore MR scanner (Bruker Biospin MRI GmbH, Germany), equipped with
a BGA12S gradient system and interfaced to Bruker Paravision 5.1 for
image acquisition and processing. A Bruker 40 mm 19F/1H dual-tuned linear volume coil was used to transmit and receive
radio frequency (rf) signals at 300.28 MHz for 1H and 282.55
MHz for 19F nuclei. Multislice 1H MR images
were acquired using RARE (rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement)
sequence in the cross view of the sample or the body of the animal
with repetition time 2200 ms, echo time 8.9 ms, RARE factor 8, field
of view 4 × 4 cm2, slice thickness 1.0 mm, matrix
size 266 × 266, in-plane resolution 150 × 150 μm2, and number of averages 6. Total acquisition time was 7 min
and 15 s. 19F images were acquired using a FLASH (fast
low angle shot) sequence in the same region of the 1H MRI
with repetition time 220 ms, flip angle = 30°, echo time 3.078
ms, matrix size 32 × 32, in-plane resolution 1.25 × 1.25
mm2, slice thickness 4.0 mm, and number of averages 768. 19F MRI parameters were identical for both calibration phantom
images and in vivo images with the reference phantom.
The flip angle was optimized based on the T1 relaxation time of the
phantom. The phantom solvent (methanol) was chosen because of similar
signal intensity of CA-lys-TFA dissolved in methanol and human bile
(94.2%, Table S1 and Figure S1 in the Supporting
Information). Remaining parameters were the same as in the
case of 1H MRI. Acquisition time was 1 h and 30 min. Concentrations
of CA-lys-TFA in gallbladders were calculated from MR images by determining
the mean signal intensity in the gallbladder region of interest (ROI)
and comparing this value to the mean signal intensity of the ROI in
a phantom placed adjacent to the mouse. In both cases, the ROI was
drawn to exclude the edges of the gallbladder and the phantom, thus
avoiding an “edge effect” due to spatial resolution.
Reference phantom imaged adjacent to the mouse used 30 mM CA-lys-TFA
dissolved in methanol in a short glass NMR tube (5 mm diameter). Mean
signal intensity was measured using Paravision 5.1 software. Mouse
gallbladder and phantom were simultaneously imaged in the same frame
under identical conditions.Color 19F MR images were
obtained using Medical Image Processing, Analysis and Visualization
software (MIPAV v7.0.1, CIT, NIH, Bethesda, MD), employing an average
image threshold of 0.65, in which the strongest signal (displayed
in red) is 1.0. The limit of quantification was assigned to be the
noise magnitude plus 2.5 times the noise standard deviation, calculated
from an ROI near the periphery of the image. Using this method, there
is greater than 99% confidence that voxels containing CA-lys-TFA concentrations
above 6.82 mM relative to the phantom are from actual 19F signal, and not noise.[19]
LC/MS/MS
Concentrations of CA-lys-TFA were determined
by LC/MS/MS using a Waters Acquity UPLC system with triple quadrupole
detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, Massachusetts, USA). The column
was a Waters Acquity UPLC ethylene bridged hybrid C8 1.7 μm
2.1 × 50 mm with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The gradient was
as follows (expressed as % ACN in water, all mobile phases including
0.1% formic acid): 50% from 0 to 0.5 min, then increased to 95% until
1.5 min, then decreased to 50% at 1.7 min and held at 50% until 2
min. Injection volume was 10 μL. Cone voltage was 75 V, dwell
time 0.100 s and collision energy 68 V. Negative electrospray ionization
was used with a multiple reaction monitoring method for the transition
631.31 to 241.07 Da. The method was linear over a range of 10 to 2000
nM (R2 = 0.9998). To measure extraction
efficiency, gallbladder extracts (n = 3) were spiked
to yield 12 mM CA-lys-TFA and subsequently subjected to sample preparation.
The LC/MS/MS determined CA-lys-TFA concentration was 102.5 ±
5.9%.
Asbt knockout mice
Five Asbt-deficient (Slc10a2) mice (mice 15–19,
average age 42.5 weeks, average weight 28.1 g) and five WT littermates
(mice 20–24, average age 44.0 weeks, average weight 28.1 g)
were obtained from a colony maintained at the Wake Forest School of
Medicine. These mice were fasted overnight and underwent oral gavage
with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA. Mice 15–18 and mice 20–23
were maintained in the fasted state and were euthanized without MRI
7 h after dosing, and blood, liver and gallbladder were collected
for LC/MS/MS analysis as described above. Mice 19 and 20 were anesthetized
with ketamine/xylazine and imaged by MRI as described above.
Data Analysis
Data are presented as average value ±
standard error of the mean. Statistical comparisons were performed
using the unpaired Student’s t test (assuming
unequal variance) and were considered significant when two-tailed P < 0.05.
Results
Imaging of CA-lys-TFA Phantoms
CA-lys-TFA was detected in vitro using both 19F MR spectroscopy (Figure 2A) and
MRI with a 1H/19F dual-tuned
volume coil (Figure 2B). A single 19F peak resulted from CA-lys-TFA’s three equivalent fluorine
atoms (Figure 2A). We observed linear relative
signal intensity (R2 = 0.997) for 0, 10,
20, and 30 mM CA-lys-TFA dissolved in methanol in glass vials and
imaged concurrently by MRI using a volume coil (Figure 2C).
Figure 2
CA-lys-TFA 19F MR spectroscopy and MRI standard curve.
(A) 19F MR spectroscopy of CA-lys-TFA in deuterated methanol
revealed a single peak for the three equivalent fluorine atoms. (B) 1H (left) and 19F (right) MR images of phantoms
containing 0, 10, 20, and 30 mM CA-lys-TFA in methanol. (C) Signal
intensity of 19F MR images correlated with CA-lys-TFA concentrations
in phantoms. Linear regression yielded R2 = 0.997.
CA-lys-TFA 19F MR spectroscopy and MRI standard curve.
(A) 19F MR spectroscopy of CA-lys-TFA in deuterated methanol
revealed a single peak for the three equivalent fluorine atoms. (B) 1H (left) and 19F (right) MR images of phantoms
containing 0, 10, 20, and 30 mM CA-lys-TFA in methanol. (C) Signal
intensity of 19F MR images correlated with CA-lys-TFA concentrations
in phantoms. Linear regression yielded R2 = 0.997.Mice
underwent in vivo MRI starting approximately 2, 7,
or 48 h after oral gavage with a single dose of 150 mg/kg of CA-lys-TFA
(mice 1–7) or after 7 days of a daily dose of 50 mg/kg (mice
8–10) (Table 1). Mice were imaged once
and euthanized, and blood, liver, and gallbladder were harvested for
LC/MS/MS analysis, except mice 2 and 6, which were imaged twice before
euthanasia. 19F MRI signals were detected with all dosing
regimens and times tested except for the first time mouse 2 was imaged
(∼2 h after dosing) and the second time mouse 6 was imaged
(∼48 h after dosing).
Table 1
CA-lys-TFA Gallbladder
Concentrations
Measured by LC/MS/MS and MRI in Individual Micea
gallbladder
[CA-lys-TFA] (mM)
mouse
dose
time of 19F MRI (h)
time of euthanasia (h)
gallbladder wt (mg)
LC/MS/MS
MRI
1
150 mg/kg
2.5–4
5.0
24
6.53
14.8
2
150 mg/kg
2.3–3.8
NM
NM
NM
NS
3
150 mg/kg
1.3–1.8
2.8
28
6.73
20.0
4
150 mg/kg
7–8.5
8.6
44
5.48
24.0
5
150 mg/kg
6.9–8.4
8.5
19
4.91
8.6
6
150 mg/kg
6.4–7.9
NM
NM
NM
25.3
7
150 mg/kg
6.8–8.3
8.4
12
1.93
18.1
2
150 mg/kg
49.3–50.8
51.4
23
8.16
24.5
6
150 mg/kg
51.0–52.5
53.0
30
1.45
NS
8
50 mg/kg 7×
1.8–3.3
4.0
14
2.87
10.4
9
50 mg/kg 7×
1.8–3.3
3.5
33
4.46
12.9
10
50 mg/kg 7×
7.3–8.8
8.9
32
3.86
12.3
Each mouse was gavaged with either
150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA once or repetitively with 50 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA
daily for seven consecutive days. Mice 2 and 6, imaged on days 1 and
3 after gavage, lack euthanasia times and LC/MS/MS data for day 1.
Times of MRI and euthanasia and gallbladder weights are also recorded.
NM = not measured, NS = no detectable signal.
Each mouse was gavaged with either
150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA once or repetitively with 50 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA
daily for seven consecutive days. Mice 2 and 6, imaged on days 1 and
3 after gavage, lack euthanasia times and LC/MS/MS data for day 1.
Times of MRI and euthanasia and gallbladder weights are also recorded.
NM = not measured, NS = no detectable signal.Concentrations of CA-lys-TFA in gallbladders were
calculated from
MR images by determining the average signal intensity in an ROI within
the organ and comparing this value to the average signal intensity
detected in an ROI within a 30 mM CA-lys-TFA phantom placed adjacent
to the mouse. In nearly allmice, gallbladder CA-lys-TFA concentrations
assessed by MRI were lower after repeated dosing with 50 mg/kg than
after a single 150 mg/kg dose (Table 1).Representative MRI images of CA-lys-TFA in gallbladders from mice
1 (Figure 3A) and 4 (Figure 3B), treated with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA and imaged 2 and 7 h
after gavage, respectively, demonstrate the ability of this methodology
to detect and measure CA-lys-TFA concentrations in vivo in the gallbladder. Overlay of images obtained by 1H
and 19F MRI signal acquisition indicated clearly that 19F signals emanated from the gallbladder (Figure 3). Also, a more intense 19F signal was
observed at 7 h compared to 2 h (Figure 3).
Compared to the MRI signal emanating from the phantom, CA-lys-TFA
concentrations in the gallbladder were determined to be 14.8 mM at
2 h (Figure 3A) and 24 mM at 7 h (Figure 3B) (Table 1). Based on these
findings, ∼7 h after gavage with CA-lys-TFA was concluded to
be the optimal time for 19F MRI, and this time frame and
a dose of 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA were used for subsequent experiments.
Figure 3
Representative
images from two mice imaged after oral gavage with
150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA. In each image, a 30 mM CA-lys-TFA phantom is
adjacent to the mouse. (A, B) Left panels depict abdominal cross-sectional
anatomy of the mouse by 1H MRI; the spine is visible at
the top and the gallbladder at the bottom. Center panels show 19F MR images obtained from the same cross-sectional area,
while right panels show overlays of 1H and 19F images. (A) 19F image acquired ∼2 h after gavage
resulted in lower CA-lys-TFA concentration in the gallbladder (arrow)
compared to the phantom (arrowhead). (B) 19F image acquired
∼7 h after dosing resulted in similar CA-lys-TFA concentrations
in the gallbladder (arrow) and phantom (arrowhead). Of note, individual
mice varied in size, e.g., the mouse in panel B was smaller than the
mouse in panel A. Hence, the image in panel B “enlarged”
the smaller mouse, as well as the phantom. Despite appearances, the
mice in panels A and B were not the same size. Likewise, despite appearances,
the phantoms were the same size.
Representative
images from two mice imaged after oral gavage with
150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA. In each image, a 30 mM CA-lys-TFA phantom is
adjacent to the mouse. (A, B) Left panels depict abdominal cross-sectional
anatomy of the mouse by 1H MRI; the spine is visible at
the top and the gallbladder at the bottom. Center panels show 19F MR images obtained from the same cross-sectional area,
while right panels show overlays of 1H and 19F images. (A) 19F image acquired ∼2 h after gavage
resulted in lower CA-lys-TFA concentration in the gallbladder (arrow)
compared to the phantom (arrowhead). (B) 19F image acquired
∼7 h after dosing resulted in similar CA-lys-TFA concentrations
in the gallbladder (arrow) and phantom (arrowhead). Of note, individual
mice varied in size, e.g., the mouse in panel B was smaller than the
mouse in panel A. Hence, the image in panel B “enlarged”
the smaller mouse, as well as the phantom. Despite appearances, the
mice in panels A and B were not the same size. Likewise, despite appearances,
the phantoms were the same size.For the 10 mice that underwent MRI and whose gallbladders
were
subsequently harvested for measurement of CA-lys-TFA levels in gallbladder
bile by LC/MS/MS, a correlation was observed between CA-lys-TFA concentrations
measured by 19F MRI and corresponding LC/MS/MS (R2 = 0.54, P = 0.02 for slope
parameter). However, as seen in Figure 4A and
Table 1, CA-lys-TFA levels calculated from 19F MRI signal intensity in the gallbladder were consistently
greater than those measured by LC/MS/MS analysis of gallbladder bile
after MRI. We hypothesized that handling mice after MRI (i.e., removal
from MRI scanner, transport, and administration of additional sedation
before laparotomy and gallbladder harvesting) promoted partial emptying
of the gallbladder.
Figure 4
Comparison of gallbladder CA-lys-TFA concentrations calculated
from 19F MRI signal intensity to those measured by LC/MS/MS.
(A) Calculation of 19F MRI signal intensity in the gallbladders
of live, anesthetized mice was accomplished by comparison to the 19F MRI signal intensity of a 30 mM CA-lys-TFA phantom. 19F image acquisition was 1.5 h. CA-lys-TFA content in gallbladder
bile by LC/MS/MS was measured after MRI. Each data point represents
results from one mouse; MRI-based and LC/MS/MS-based measurements
are paired (n = 10 mice). Linear regression analysis
(solid line) yielded R2 = 0.54, P = 0.02, indicating association between MRI-based and LC/MS/MS-determined
values. The line of unity is dashed. (B) Comparison of CA-lys-TFA
measurements obtained from MRI and LC/MS/MS after applying a 2.7(±0.8)
correction factor to LC/MS/MS values to account for a post-MRI effect.
The line of unity is dashed, while the line from regression is solid
(R2 = 0.54). The slope from linear regression
is 0.83, i.e., 2.7(±0.8)-fold lower than the regressed slope
in panel A.
Comparison of gallbladder CA-lys-TFA concentrations calculated
from 19F MRI signal intensity to those measured by LC/MS/MS.
(A) Calculation of 19F MRI signal intensity in the gallbladders
of live, anesthetized mice was accomplished by comparison to the 19F MRI signal intensity of a 30 mM CA-lys-TFA phantom. 19F image acquisition was 1.5 h. CA-lys-TFA content in gallbladder
bile by LC/MS/MS was measured after MRI. Each data point represents
results from one mouse; MRI-based and LC/MS/MS-based measurements
are paired (n = 10 mice). Linear regression analysis
(solid line) yielded R2 = 0.54, P = 0.02, indicating association between MRI-based and LC/MS/MS-determined
values. The line of unity is dashed. (B) Comparison of CA-lys-TFA
measurements obtained from MRI and LC/MS/MS after applying a 2.7(±0.8)
correction factor to LC/MS/MS values to account for a post-MRI effect.
The line of unity is dashed, while the line from regression is solid
(R2 = 0.54). The slope from linear regression
is 0.83, i.e., 2.7(±0.8)-fold lower than the regressed slope
in panel A.To test this hypothesis,
mice 11–14 underwent oral gavage
with a single dose of 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA and were euthanized 8.5
h later without undergoing MRI. As predicted, in these miceCA-lys-TFA
levels measured by LC/MS/MS (average, 11.2 ± 1.7 mM in mice 11–14)
were statistically indistinguishable (P = 0.35) from
those measured by 19F MRI in other mice at 8.5 h (average,
16.9 ± 4.5 mM in mice 4, 5, and 7). The average CA-lys-TFA concentration
measured by LC/MS/MS in gallbladders of imaged mice 4, 5, and 7 was
4.1 ± 1.1 mM, 2.7(±0.8)-fold lower compared to 11.2 ±
1.7 mM in gallbladders from mice 11–14 (P =
0.01). These results could not be explained by differences in gallbladder
weights; average gallbladder weights in imaged and nonimaged mice
were nearly identical (25 ± 10 vs 23 ± 3 mg, respectively).
Overall, these findings supported the hypothesis that post-MRI animal
handling reduces gallbladder CA-lys-TFA concentration.To address
these postulated post-MRI animal handling effects, CA-lys-TFA
concentrations quantified by 19F MRI and LC/MS/MS (mice
1–10; Table 1) were re-examined and
LC/MS/MS concentrations multiplied by a 2.7(±0.8)-correction
factor (Figure 4B). Compared to findings when
mouse handling after MRI is not considered (Figure 4A), the resultant analysis more closely follows the line of
unity for CA-lys-TFA concentrations determined by 19F MRI
and LC/MS/MS (Figure 4B). The analysis in Figure 4 was repeated with data at the origin (0,0) excluded
and where an intercept was not fitted (Figure S2 in Supporting Information); results of this approach supported
the same conclusions. Of note, this 2.7(±0.8)-fold difference
may be applicable to the methods here (e.g., Bruker 40 mm 19F/1H dual-tuned linear volume coil) and not to other methods.
Additionally, this 2.7(±0.8)-fold difference is a point estimate
that assumes an equal post-MRI animal handling effect across allmice.Bile acids are highly concentrated in the gallbladder. Thus, it
was not surprising to find that concentrations of CA-lys-TFA in plasma
and liver from mice 1–14 were orders of magnitude lower than
those detected in gallbladder (0.70–22.97 μM in liver;
0.02–16.56 μM in plasma vs 1.45–13.93 mM in gallbladder)
(Table S1 in Supporting Information): too
low to generate 19F MRI signals. Moreover, as we reported
previously following a single dose of 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA,[15] histological analysis of H&E-stained sections
of mouse stomach, liver, and small intestine from mice 8–10
showed no tissue damage after 7-day repetitive dosing with 50 mg/kg
CA-lys-TFA. These findings provide reassurance regarding the in vivo safety of the novel probe.
Asbt Knockout Mouse Studies
WT mice 15–19 and
Asbt-deficient mice 20–24 were gavaged with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA.
Mice 15–18 and 20–23 were euthanized 7 h later without
MRI. As measured by LC/MS/MS, a striking 30.8-fold difference in the
CA-lys-TFA content of gallbladders from WT compared to those from
Asbt-deficient mice was observed (9.81 ± 2.13 vs 0.32 ±
0.03 mM, respectively, P = 0.004) (Figure 5A). These findings predicted that CA-lys-TFA concentrations
in gallbladders of Asbt-deficient mice would be below the 19F MRI limits of detection.
Figure 5
(A) Comparison of gallbladder bile CA-lys-TFA
in WT and Asbt-deficient
mice. Four WT and four Slc10a2–/– mice
were gavaged with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA and euthanized 7 h later, and
gallbladder bile CA-lys-TFA was measured by LC/MS/MS. CA-lys-TFA was
30.8-fold greater in gallbladders from WT compared to Asbt-deficient
mice (P = 0.004, Student’s t-test). (B) Lack of 19F MRI signal for CA-lys-TFA in gallbladder
of Asbt-deficient mouse. Images were obtained 6.5–8 h after
oral gavage with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA. Left panels show 1H MRI cross-sectional images, center panels show the same cross-sectional
images obtained using 19F MRI, and right panels show overlay
of 1H and 19F images. MRI of WT mouse shows
CA-lys-TFA signal in gallbladder. In contrast, no 19F MRI
signal was detected in the Asbt-deficient mouse imaged under the same
conditions. 19F MRI acquisition was 1.5 h for both animals.
(A) Comparison of gallbladder bile CA-lys-TFA
in WT and Asbt-deficient
mice. Four WT and four Slc10a2–/– mice
were gavaged with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA and euthanized 7 h later, and
gallbladder bile CA-lys-TFA was measured by LC/MS/MS. CA-lys-TFA was
30.8-fold greater in gallbladders from WT compared to Asbt-deficient
mice (P = 0.004, Student’s t-test). (B) Lack of 19F MRI signal for CA-lys-TFA in gallbladder
of Asbt-deficient mouse. Images were obtained 6.5–8 h after
oral gavage with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA. Left panels show 1H MRI cross-sectional images, center panels show the same cross-sectional
images obtained using 19F MRI, and right panels show overlay
of 1H and 19F images. MRI of WT mouse shows
CA-lys-TFA signal in gallbladder. In contrast, no 19F MRI
signal was detected in the Asbt-deficient mouse imaged under the same
conditions. 19F MRI acquisition was 1.5 h for both animals.To confirm this prediction, mice
19 and 24 were imaged by MRI (19F acquisition time 6.5–8.0
h and 6.6–8.1 h
after oral gavage with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA, respectively) and euthanized
9.1 h (mouse 19) and 8.4 h (mouse 24) after gavage. As anticipated,
an intense19F gallbladder signal was detected in WT mouse
19 (Figure 5B). CA-lys-TFA measured by LC/MS/MS
in gallbladder bile from mouse 19 was 4.81 mM (Table S2 in Supporting Information; equivalent to 13.0 mM
after correction for post-MRI animal handling), whereas the concentration
measured by MRI was 18.2 mM. In contrast, no 19F signal
was detected by MRI in the Asbt-deficient mouse (mouse 24) (Figure 5B). In mouse 24, CA-lys-TFA measured by LC/MS/MS
in gallbladder bile was 0.27 mM (Table S2 in Supporting
Information; equivalent to 0.73 mM with application of the
post-MRI correction factor), confirming that the CA-lys-TFA concentration
was indeed below 19F MRI limits of detection. As observed
with mice 1–10, CA-lys-TFA levels measured by LC/MS/MS in liver
and plasma from mice 15–24 were much lower than those in the
gallbladder (Table S2 in Supporting Information), values also well below 19F MRI limits of detection.
Discussion
Previously, we showed that the inhaled anesthetic,
isoflurane,
which like CA-lys-TFA has three equivalent fluorine atoms, can be
detected in the gallbladder of live mice using 19F MRI.[20] In the present work CA-lys-TFA, a novel bile
acid analogue, was successfully and reproducibly imaged in the murine
gallbladder using 19F MRI. To our knowledge, this represents
the first report that a drug absorbed orally can be imaged in vivo by 19F MRI.Others have used 19F magnetic resonance spectroscopy
(MRS) to detect fluorinated drugs and their metabolites.[21] MRS, however, does not provide spatial information
regarding the anatomical location of drugs. Injected or infused drugs,
including perfluorocarbons (PFCs) in which allhydrogen atoms in an
organic structure were converted to fluorine, have been imaged by 19F MRI. Since fluorine signals can respond to changes in the
environment, such as oxygen levels, temperature, and blood flow,[22] PFCs are sometimes used as MRI contrast agents[23,24] or for cell labeling and tracking.[25] In
general, PFCs are disadvantaged by low water solubility and thus are
not ideal for tagging drugs for oral absorption. Researchers have
also taken advantage of high numbers of equivalent fluorine atoms
for tagging molecules for use as imaging agents.[17] However, high molecular weight fluorine tags limit drug
absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, and large tag size can
alter intrinsic activity and disposition compared to the parent molecule.Visualization of a trifluorinated drug in bile presents a potentially
exciting new avenue for imaging the metabolism or biliary excretion
of fluorinated drugs. Additionally, the trifluoroacetamidyl group
can be used to tag nonfluorinated drugs for imaging, as long as they
accumulate spatially in relatively high concentration. Unlike PFCs
or compounds with large numbers of equivalent fluorine atoms that
were imaged after injection, the trifluoroacetimidyl group was sufficiently
small to allow drug absorption from the intestine. In the present
work this was achieved by combined passive and active uptake, the
latter mediated by the ileal bile acid transporter ASBT.The 19F MRI limit of detection for CA-lys-TFA in the
gallbladder was estimated here to be ∼5 mM as measured by LC/MS/MS
after mice were euthanized. The lowest CA-lys-TFA concentration in
gallbladder bile detected by LC/MS/MS with corresponding successful
detection by MRI was 1.93 mM (corrected value of 5.21 mM) (Table 1, mouse 7), whereas a gallbladder CA-lys-TFA concentration
of 1.45 mM (corrected value of 3.92 mM) was not detected by 19F MRI (Table 1, mouse 6 on day 3 after gavage).
This limit of detection for 19F MRI by LC/MS/MS (e.g.,
5.21 mM) is similar to that directly from 19F MRI (i.e.,
6.82 mM), providing further support for the observed 2.7(±0.8)-fold
difference. Previously, using a surface coil for 19F MRI,
the limit of detection for a trifluorinated drug was estimated to
be 1 mM.[20] The current work utilized a
volume coil to eliminate signal-to-noise ratio changes that otherwise
depend on distance from the coil, and thus allowed the use of a phantom
for gallbladder concentration estimation. Of note, limit of detection
and signal-to-noise ratio can vary with imaging acquisition time.
Here, a 1.5-h 19F image acquisition time was employed for
CA-lys-TFA. In mice, the bile acid pool is ∼4 mg.[26] For a 25-g mouse, the dose was 3.75 mg, which
is similar to its pool size. The humanbile acid pool is 2–4
g. Thus the detection method has the potential for increased sensitivity
or a shorter acquisition time in humans, wherein a much larger gallbladder
size would allow for the use of a lower geometric resolution.A limitation of CA-lys-TFA MRI is the probe’s metabolism
by gut bacterial enzymes.[15] Bacterial removal
of the side chain and hepatic reconjugation with taurine or glycine
is part of normal bile acid metabolism and likely accounts for the
diminished MRI signal intensity in gallbladder after repetitive dosing
with 50 mg/kg daily for 7 days (mice 8–10) and 50 h after dosing
with 150 mg/kg (mouse 6) (Table 1).In
mice, Asbt deficiency strikingly reduced gallbladder concentrations
of CA-lys-TFA. In WT mice, the average gallbladder bile CA-lys-TFA
concentration was 9.81 ± 2.13 mM whereas in Asbt-deficient mice
it was 0.32 ± 0.03 mM, a value well below our estimated 19F MRI limit of detection (5 mM). This was confirmed by the
absence of a 19F MRI signal in an Asbt-deficient mouse
7 h after gavage with 150 mg/kg CA-lys-TFA, contrasting with the robust
signal in a WT mouse (Figure 5). Thus, in this
Asbt-deficient mouse model of BAM, 19F MRI following oral
dosing with CA-lys-TFA can clearly identify impaired bile acid uptake.
Collectively, these findings indicate that CA-lys-TFA, a novel fluorine-labeled
imaging agent, has potential as a tool to measure bile acid transport. 19F MR gallbladder imaging, a methodology involving no ionizing
radiation, also shows promise as a noninvasive in vivo clinical test to diagnose BAM or otherwise impaired bile acid transit.
Authors: S Flacke; S Fischer; M J Scott; R J Fuhrhop; J S Allen; M McLean; P Winter; G A Sicard; P J Gaffney; S A Wickline; G M Lanza Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul A Dawson; Jamie Haywood; Ann L Craddock; Martha Wilson; Mary Tietjen; Kimberly Kluckman; Nobuyo Maeda; John S Parks Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-06-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Alexander L Ticho; Pooja Malhotra; Pradeep K Dudeja; Ravinder K Gill; Waddah A Alrefai Journal: Compr Physiol Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 9.090
Authors: Jean-Pierre Raufman; Paul A Dawson; Anuradha Rao; Cinthia B Drachenberg; Jonathon Heath; Aaron C Shang; Shien Hu; Min Zhan; James E Polli; Kunrong Cheng Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2015-07-25 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Kunrong Cheng; Melissa Metry; Jessica Felton; Aaron C Shang; Cinthia B Drachenberg; Su Xu; Min Zhan; Justin Schumacher; Grace L Guo; James E Polli; Jean-Pierre Raufman Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-05-22