Literature DB >> 24707976

The distractor positivity (Pd) signals lowering of attentional priority: evidence from event-related potentials and individual differences.

Nicolas Burra1, Dirk Kerzel.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of task demands and individual differences on the allocation of attention. Using the same stimuli, participants indicated the orientation of a line contained in a shape singleton (identification task) or the presence of singletons (detection task). Shape singletons in the identification task elicited a contralateral negativity (N2pc) whereas shape singletons in the detection task elicited a contralateral positivity (Pd). We suggest that the reduction of attentional priority of a salient stimulus, reflected by the Pd, occurred more rapidly with the less demanding detection task. Further, fewer distractible participants showed a larger N2pc to lateral color distractors than highly distractible participants. We suggest that highly distractible participants developed compensatory mechanisms to suppress distracting stimuli.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bottom-up; Distractibility; EEG; Interindividual differences; N2pc; Pd; Saliency; Top-down; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24707976     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  14 in total

1.  How Attention Changes in Response to Incentives.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-29

5.  Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Electrophysiological evidence that psychopathic personality traits are associated with atypical response to salient distractors.

Authors:  Patrick L Carolan; John M Gaspar; Killian Kleffner; Mario Liotti
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Naso-Temporal Asymmetries: Suppression of Emotional Faces in the Temporal Visual Hemifield.

Authors:  David Framorando; Mylène Bapst; Nathalie Vuille; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.

Authors:  Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.