Literature DB >> 23552648

Investigating links between shale gas development and health impacts through a community survey project in Pennsylvania.

Nadia Steinzor1, Wilma Subra, Lisa Sumi.   

Abstract

Across the United States, the race for new energy sources is picking up speed and reaching more places, with natural gas in the lead. While the toxic and polluting qualities of substances used and produced in shale gas development and the general health effects of exposure are well established, scientific evidence of causal links has been limited, creating an urgent need to understand health impacts. Self-reported survey research documenting the symptoms experienced by people living in proximity to gas facilities, coupled with environmental testing, can elucidate plausible links that warrant both response and further investigation. This method, recently applied to the gas development areas of Pennsylvania, indicates the need for a range of policy and research efforts to safeguard public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23552648     DOI: 10.2190/NS.23.1.e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Solut        ISSN: 1048-2911


  34 in total

1.  Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in Pennsylvania, USA.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; David A Savitz; Sara G Rasmussen; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Jonathan Pollak; Dione G Mercer; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  The importance of public health agency independence: Marcellus shale gas drilling in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Bernard D Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Public Participation in Air Sampling and Water Quality Test Kit Development to Enable Citizen Science.

Authors:  Erin N Haynes; Timothy J Hilbert; Rusty Roberts; John Quirolgico; Rachael Shepler; Gerry Beckner; Jennifer Veevers; Jeff Burkle; Roman Jandarov
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2019

Review 4.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  The shale gas boom and the need for rational policy.

Authors:  Madelon Finkel; Jake Hays; Adam Law
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Unconventional natural gas development and hospitalizations: evidence from Pennsylvania, United States, 2003-2014.

Authors:  A Denham; M Willis; A Zavez; E Hill
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.427

7.  The role of toxicological science in meeting the challenges and opportunities of hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Bernard D Goldstein; Bryan W Brooks; Steven D Cohen; Alexander E Gates; Michael E Honeycutt; John B Morris; Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta; Trevor M Penning; John Snawder
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Shale gas development in Canada: what are the potential health effects?

Authors:  Lalita Bharadwaj; Bernard D Goldstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  In Our Backyard: Perceptions About Fracking, Science, and Health by Community Members.

Authors:  Jane A McElroy; Christopher D Kassotis; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2020-02-06

Review 10.  Systematic review of the association between oil and natural gas extraction processes and human reproduction.

Authors:  Victoria D Balise; Chun-Xia Meng; Jennifer N Cornelius-Green; Christopher D Kassotis; Rana Kennedy; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.