Literature DB >> 24702513

Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion.

Marjan Alimi1, Christoph P Hofstetter, Guang-Ting Cong, Apostolos John Tsiouris, Andrew R James, Danika Paulo, Eric Elowitz, Roger Härtl.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (ELIF) is a popular technique for anterior fixation of the thoracolumbar spine. Clinical and radiological outcome studies are required to assess safety and efficacy. The aim of this study was to describe the functional and radiological impact of ELIF in a degenerative disc disease population with a longer follow-up and to assess the durability of this procedure.
METHODS: Demographic and perioperative data for all patients who had undergone ELIF for degenerative lumbar disorders between 2007 and 2011 were collected. Trauma and tumor cases were excluded. For radiological outcome, the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and latest follow-up coronal Cobb angle, lumbar sagittal lordosis, bilateral foraminal heights, and disc heights were measured. Pelvic incidence (PI) and PI-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch were assessed in scoliotic patients. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS), as well as the Macnab criteria.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-five vertebral levels were surgically treated in 90 patients. Pedicle screw and rod constructs and lateral plates were used to stabilize fixation in 77% and 13% of cases, respectively. Ten percent of cases involved stand-alone cages. At an average radiological follow-up of 12.6 months, the coronal Cobb angle was 10.6° compared with 23.8° preoperatively (p < 0.0001). Lumbar sagittal lordosis increased by 5.3° postoperatively (p < 0.0001) and by 2.9° at the latest follow-up (p = 0.014). Foraminal height and disc height increased by 4 mm (p < 0.0001) and 3.3 mm (p < 0.0001), respectively, immediately after surgery and remained significantly improved at the last follow-up. Separate evaluation of scoliotic patients showed no statistically significant improvement in PI and PI-LL mismatch either immediately postoperatively or at the latest follow-up. Clinical evaluation at an average follow-up of 17.6 months revealed an improvement in the ODI and the VAS scores for back, buttock, and leg pain by 21.1% and 3.7, 3.6, and 3.7 points, respectively (p < 0.0001). According to the Macnab criteria, 84.8% of patients had an excellent, good, or fair functional outcome. New postoperative thigh numbness and weakness was detected in 4.4% and 2.2% of the patients, respectively, which resolved within the first 3 months after surgery in all but 1 case.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides what is to the authors' knowledge the most comprehensive set of radiological and clinical outcomes of ELIF in a fairly large population at a midterm follow-up. Extreme lateral interbody fusion showed good clinical outcomes with a low complication rate. The procedure allows for at least midterm clinically effective restoration of disc and foraminal heights. Improvement in coronal deformity and a small but significant increase in sagittal lordosis were observed. Nonetheless, no significant improvement in the PI-LL mismatch was achieved in scoliotic patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; BMI = body mass index; Cobb angle; DDD = degenerative disc disease; ELIF = extreme lateral interbody fusion; LL = lumbar lordosis; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; Oswestry Disability Index; PI = pelvic incidence; VAS = visual analog scale; disc height; extreme lateral interbody fusion; foraminal height; lumbar lordosis; visual analog scale

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24702513     DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  30 in total

Review 1.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion: morphometric change of intervertebral structure.

Authors:  Koji Akeda; Kevin Cheng; Edward Abarado; Norihiko Takegami; Junichi Yamada; Nozomu Inoue; Koichi Masuda; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  An Algorithm to Predict Success of Indirect Decompression Using the Extreme Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedure.

Authors:  Brandon C Gabel; Reid Hoshide; William Taylor
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-09-08

Review 4.  Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review.

Authors:  Mark J Winder; Shanu Gambhir
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

5.  Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Rhiannon M Parker; Ben Goss; Carl M Blecher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar decompressions and fusions.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Jonathan S Markowitz; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kelly H Yom; Kern Singh
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

7.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Andrea Zanirato; Luca Cavagnaro; Marco Basso; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli; Carlo Formica
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion for unilateral symptomatic vertical foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Eric Elowitz; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  M Formica; D Vallerga; A Zanirato; L Cavagnaro; M Basso; S Divano; L Mosconi; E Quarto; G Siri; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-01-01

Review 10.  Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gun Keorochana; Kitipong Setrkraising; Patarawan Woratanarat; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.