Literature DB >> 33651180

Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion: morphometric change of intervertebral structure.

Koji Akeda1, Kevin Cheng2, Edward Abarado2, Norihiko Takegami3, Junichi Yamada3, Nozomu Inoue4, Koichi Masuda2, Akihiro Sudo3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Two-dimensional (2D) analyses of intervertebral disc (IVD) height and foramen measurements following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) have been reported. However, three-dimensional (3D) morphometric analysis of intervertebral structure using 3D computed tomography (3D CT) provides increased precision for measuring morphological changes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 3D changes of lumbar IVD height and foramen diameter in degenerative lumbar disease patients following LLIF.
METHODS: Subject-based 3D CT lumbar models were created for 26 patients before and following LLIF. IVD height (whole and five anatomical zones) and foramen diameter (minimum and maximum) were measured based on the model using custom software. The sagittal placement of cages (SPC) and cross-sectional area of the thecal sac (CSA) were measured. Changes in these parameters by LLIF were quantified and statistically analysed.
RESULTS: Following LLIF, disc height increased by an average of 2.9 mm (P < 0.01). Post-operative measurements of both minimum and maximum diameters of the foramen were significantly increased by 1.0 mm and 1.9 mm, respectively (P < 0.01). Change in maximum foramen diameter was significantly correlated with change in disc height (P < 0.05). The SPC was significantly correlated with the changes in disc height and foraminal diameters (P < 0.05, respectively). No significant change between the change in disc height and CSA was found.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary study quantifies disc height and foramen diameter changes in 3D following LLIF. The presented data provide baseline intervertebral changes for future comparisons with follow-up studies and clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D model; CT-based analysis; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Lumbar spine; MRI

Year:  2021        PMID: 33651180     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06776-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

Review 1.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications.

Authors:  Brian Kwon; David Hanwuk Kim
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  The Impact of Cage Dimensions, Positioning, and Side of Approach in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Gernot Lang; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Moritz Perrech; Connor Berlin; Christoph P Hofstetter; Yu Moriguchi; Eric Elowitz; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.876

3.  Effects of intradiscal vacuum phenomenon on surgical outcome of lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease.

Authors:  Chun-Po Yen; Joshua M Beckman; Andrew C Vivas; Konrad Bach; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-12-16

4.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion for unilateral symptomatic vertical foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Eric Elowitz; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Adam M Caputo; Keith W Michael; Todd M Chapman; Jason M Jennings; Elizabeth W Hubbard; Robert E Isaacs; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Philip K Louie; Arya G Varthi; Ankur S Narain; Victor Lei; Daniel D Bohl; Grant D Shifflett; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): A single-center clinical and radiological follow-up study of 20 patients.

Authors:  Enrico Tessitore; Granit Molliqaj; Karl Schaller; Oliver Pascal Gautschi
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Radiographic Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Traditional Fusion Approaches: Analysis of Sagittal Contour Change.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Sharon C Yson; Ryan D Horazdovsky; Edward Rainier G Santos; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-19

9.  Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Guang-Ting Cong; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Andrew R James; Danika Paulo; Eric Elowitz; Roger Härtl
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-04-04

10.  Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results of Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Yutaka Kono; Hogaku Gen; Yoshio Sakuma; Yasuhide Koshika
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-04-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  Intradiscal injection of monosodium iodoacetate induces intervertebral disc degeneration in an experimental rabbit model.

Authors:  Takao Sudo; Koji Akeda; Koki Kawaguchi; Takahiro Hasegawa; Junichi Yamada; Nozomu Inoue; Koichi Masuda; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.156

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.