Literature DB >> 29027622

Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar decompressions and fusions.

Ankur S Narain1, Fady Y Hijji1, Jonathan S Markowitz1, Krishna T Kudaravalli1, Kelly H Yom1, Kern Singh2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to summarize the recent literature investigating the use of minimally invasive (MIS) techniques in the treatment of lumbar degenerative stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis. RECENT
FINDINGS: MIS lumbar decompression and fusion techniques for degenerative pathology are associated with reduced operative morbidity, shortened length of hospital stay, and reduced postoperative pain and narcotics utilization. Recent studies with long-term clinical follow-up have demonstrated equivalence in clinical outcomes between open and MIS surgical procedures. Radiographically, MIS procedures provide adequate postoperative correction of coronal alignment. Correction of sagittal alignment, however, is more variable based on current reports. MIS techniques are both safe and effective in the treatment of lumbar degenerative pathologies. While some studies have reported on long-term outcomes and costs associated with MIS procedures, more investigation into these topics is still necessary. Additionally, further work is required to analyze the training requirements and learning curves of MIS procedures to better promote adoption amongst surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degenerative scoliosis; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; LLIF; Lumbar stenosis; Minimally invasive surgery; TLIF

Year:  2017        PMID: 29027622      PMCID: PMC5685968          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-017-9446-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  75 in total

1.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1-2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Wale A R Sulaiman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 2.  The adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Complications associated with the initial learning curve of minimally invasive spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph A Sclafani; Choll W Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Kaveh Khajavi; Alessandria Y Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter; Brett A Freedman; Eric G Verwiebe; Jordan M Hall; David W Polly; Timothy R Kuklo
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-08

6.  Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Akihito Minamide; Munehito Yoshida; Hiroshi Yamada; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Masaki Kawai; Kazuhiro Maio; Hiroshi Hashizume; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Shunji Tsutsui
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-10-04

7.  Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery.

Authors:  Chia-Liang Ang; Benjamin Phak-Boon Tow; Stephanie Fook; Chang-Ming Guo; John Li-Tat Chen; Wai-Mun Yue; Seang-Beng Tan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 8.  Degenerative scoliosis. Options for surgical management.

Authors:  Munish C Gupta
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes.

Authors:  Won-Suh Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Jung-Woo Hur; Ji-Hoon Seong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Boomerang-Shaped Cage with Traditional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Yohei Ishihara; Masutaro Morishita; Jiro Miyaki; Koji Kanzaki; Tomoaki Toyone
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-07-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.