Literature DB >> 24691710

Patient specific implants: scope for the future.

Rajesh N Maniar1, Tushar Singhi.   

Abstract

"Patient Specific" technology introduced in last 5 years, slowly gained popularity but has currently plateaued. We have a number of studies on patient specific instruments where they have been compared with conventional jigs in total knee arthroplasty and reported to have no clear additional benefits. This review discusses their intraoperative and postoperative advantages/disadvantages and cost effectiveness and provides a synopsis in light of current literature. Patient specific implants are not freely available yet, and there is no scientific literature reporting on their use in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID： 24691710      PMCID： PMC4092203          DOI： 10.1007/s12178-014-9214-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN： 1935-9748


  17 in total

1.  Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler Steven Watters; Richard C Mather; James A Browne; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2011

2.  In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William Barrett; Daniel Hoeffel; David Dalury; J Bohannon Mason; Jeff Murphy; Sam Himden
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Gene Dossett; George J Swartz; Nicolette A Estrada; George W LeFevre; Bertram G Kwasman
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Alignment for total knee replacement: a comparison of kinematic axis versus mechanical axis techniques. A cadaver study.

Authors:  Michael Nogler; William Hozack; Dermot Collopy; Eckart Mayr; Gregory Deirmengian; Kathrin Sekyra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category?

Authors:  Stephen M Howell; Stacey J Howell; Kyle T Kuznik; Joe Cohen; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system.

Authors:  Yoon Whan Roh; Tae Woo Kim; Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  John W Noble; Chris A Moore; Ning Liu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Jan Dujardin; Hilde Vandenneucker; Nele Arnout; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sébastien Lustig; Corey J Scholes; Sam I Oussedik; Vera Kinzel; Myles R J Coolican; David A Parker
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.757
View more
  7 in total

1.  Patient - implant dimension mismatch in total knee arthroplasty: Is it worth worrying? An Indian scenario.

Authors:  Jai Thilak; Melvin J George
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.251

2.  Effect of Post-Cam Design for Normal Knee Joint Kinematic, Ligament, and Quadriceps Force in Patient-Specific Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty by Using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Sae Kwang Kwon; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Short to Midterm Follow-Up of Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density after Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Ribbed Anatomic Stem.

Authors:  Xiang-Dong Wu; Mian Tian; Yao He; Hong Chen; Yu Chen; Rahul Mishra; Wei Liu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  3D printable SiO2 nanoparticle ink for patient specific bone regeneration.

Authors:  Uday Kiran Roopavath; Raghav Soni; Urbashi Mahanta; Atul Suresh Deshpande; Subha Narayan Rath
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Effect of micro-arc oxidation surface modification of 3D-printed porous titanium alloys on biological properties.

Authors:  Renhua Ni; Zehao Jing; Chenao Xiong; Dexuan Meng; Chongbin Wei; Hong Cai
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

6.  Beneficial osseointegration effect of hydroxyapatite coating on cranial implant - FEM investigation.

Authors:  Jakub Chamrad; Petr Marcián; Jan Cizek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prediction of wear performance in femoral and tibial conformity in patient-specific cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Kyoung-Mi Park; Hwa-Yong Lee; Joon-Hee Park; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.359
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.