| Literature DB >> 24688512 |
Perumal Jayaprabha Agaliya1, Kadirvelu Jeevaratnam1.
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria are non pathogenic organism widely distributed in nature typically involved in a large number of spontaneous food fermentation. The purpose of this study was to characterize the bacteriocinogenic lactobacilli from fermented idli batter which can find application in biopreservation and biomedicine. Eight most promising lactobacilli were chosen from twenty two isolates based on their spectrum of activity against other lactic acid bacteria and pathogens. The eight lactobacilli were characterized based on the various classical phenotypic tests, physiological tests and biochemical tests including various carbohydrate utilization profiles. All isolates were homo fermentative, catalase, and gelatin negative. Molecular characterization was performed by RAPD, 16S rRNA analysis, 16S ARDRA, and Multiplex PCR for species identification. RAPD was carried out using the primer R2 and M13. Five different clusters were obtained based on RAPD indicating strain level variation. 16S rRNA analysis showed 99 to 100% homology towards Lactobacillus plantarum. The restriction digestion pattern was similar for all the isolates with the restriction enzyme AluI. The subspecies were identified by performing Multiplex PCR using species specific primer. Among the five clusters, three clusters were clearly identified as Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum, Lactobacillus pentosus, and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. argentoratensis.Entities:
Keywords: Idli batter; Lactobacillus pentosus; Lactobacillus plantarum; Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. argentoratensis; bacteriocin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24688512 PMCID: PMC3958188 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822013000400025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Antimicrobial activity against LAB and various pathogens Diameter of the well is 6 mm.
| Indicator strains | Inhibition zone in mm | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| JJ 18 | JJ 22 | JJ 24 | JJ 29 | JJ 30 | JJ 55 | JJ 58 | JJ 60 | |
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| 12 | 14 | 14 | 17 | 15 | 16 | 12 | 17 | |
| 12 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | |
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| 17 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 18 | |
| 11 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | |
| 18 | 18 | 18 | 19 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 19 | |
| 18 | 18 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 18 | 19 | |
| 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 17 | |
| 13 | 14 | 14 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | |
| 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 15 | |
| 16 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 19 | |
| 16 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 15 | 14 | 16 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 19 | |
Figure 1Antimicrobial activity of JJ 18 against Staphylococcus aureus. (1) CFS adjusted to pH 5 (2) CFS treated with protease.
Phenotypic, physiological and biochemical characterization of the isolates.
| JJ 18 | JJ 22 | JJ 24 | JJ 29 | JJ 30 | JJ 55 | JJ 58 | JJ 60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell form | Bacillus | Bacillus | Bacillus | Bacillus | Bacillus | Bacillus | Bacillus | Bacillus |
| Gas from glucose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Homo-hetero fermentation | Ho | Ho | Ho | Ho | Ho | Ho | Ho | Ho |
| Growth at temperature | ||||||||
| 10 °C | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 15 °C | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 37 °C | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 45 °C | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Growth at pH | ||||||||
| 3.5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 4.5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 8.5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 9.5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Salt tolerance | ||||||||
| 4% | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 6.5% | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 10% | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Catalase production | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Slime from sucrose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Acetoin production | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| Isomers of lactic acid | DL | DL | DL | DL | DL | DL | DL | DL |
| Arginine hydrolysis | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Starch hydrolysis | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Gelatin liquefaction | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Esculin hydrolysis | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Carbohydrate utilization | ||||||||
| Lactose | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | + |
| Galactose | − | ± | ± | − | ± | ± | − | + |
| Trehalose | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + |
| Melibiose | + | − | − | − | − | ± | + | − |
| L-Arabinose | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | ± |
| Inositol | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − |
| Sorbitol | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − |
| Melezitose | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + |
| α-methyl mannoside | − | − | − | − | − | − | ± | − |
(+) indicates growth/sugar utilization, (−) indicates no growth/no sugar utilization and (±) indicates weak positive growth.
All isolates gave positive for the sugars maltose, sucrose, salicin, ribose, cellobiose, inulin, fructose, dextrose, and mannose, while negative for the sugars rhamnose, xylose, raffinose, glycerol, glucosamine, dulcitol, mannitol, adonitol, α methyl glucoside, xylitol, ONPG, D- arabinose, citrate, malonate, and sorbose.
Figure 2RAPD Analysis using the primer R2 (A) and primer M13 (B). M is the 500 bp marker.
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree with the 16S rRNA gene using the MEGA v5.05 program by neighbor-joining (NJ) method.
Figure 416S-ARDRA using AluI restriction enzyme for the isolates. M is the 100 bp marker.
Figure 5Multiplex PCR using recA species specific primer. JJ 18, JJ 22, JJ 29 and JJ 30 were Lactobacillus plantarum with subspecies unidentified. JJ 24 is Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. argentoratensis. JJ 55 is Lactobacillus plantarum with subspecies unidentified. JJ 58 is Lactobacillus pentosus. JJ 60 is Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum. M is the 100 bp marker.