| Literature DB >> 26691480 |
Anvar Hussain Noorul Anisha1, Rangasamy Anandham2, Soon Woo Kwon3, Pandiyan Indira Gandhi4, Nellaiappan Olaganathan Gopal2.
Abstract
Adhirasam is a cereal based, doughnut shaped, deep fried dessert consumed in the southern regions of India. The dough used to prepare adhirasam is fermented and contains rice flour and jaggery. The aim of the present study was to characterize the cultivable bacteria associated with this fermented dough and to identify a suitable starter culture for the production of quality adhirasam. In total, one hundred and seventy bacterial isolates were recovered from de Man Rogosa Sharp (MRS) agar, nutrient agar, lysogeny agar and tryptic soy agar media. Out of the 170 bacterial isolates, sixteen isolates were selected based on their ability to tolerate glucose and sucrose. All the bacterial isolates tolerated 15% glucose and 30% sucrose. Analyses of 16S rDNA gene sequences of the bacterial isolates showed that the dominant cultivable bacteria were members of the genus Bacillus. These strains were further used as starters and tested for their ability to ferment rice flour with jaggery to produce adhirasam dough. Organoleptic evaluation was carried out to choose the best starter strain. Adhirasam prepared from Bacillus subtilis isolates S4-P11, S2-G2-A1 and S1-G15, Bacillus tequilensis isolates S2-H16, S3-P9, S3-G10 and Bacillus siamensis isolate S2-G13 were highly acceptable to consumers. Adhirasam prepared using these starter cultures had superior product characteristics such as softness in texture, flavor and enhanced aroma and sweet taste.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26691480 PMCID: PMC4704633 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246420140409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Morphological and biochemical characterization of bacterial isolates from adhirasam dough.
| Bacterial isolates | Colony morphology | Cell morphology | Gram's reaction | Oxidase | Catalase | Curdling | Spore formation | Sugar fermentation test | Sucrose tolerance test | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | Sucrose | Lactose | 40% | 50% | 60% | 70% | |||||||||||
| Cc | G | Cc | G | Cc | G | ||||||||||||
| S2-H14 | Irregular, creamy | Rod | +ve | – | + | ++ | + | + | – | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S2-H16 | Round, Smooth, Yellowish | Rod | +ve | + | + | ++ | + | + | – | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | + |
| S4-P4 | Moist, Grey, Smooth | Rod | -ve | – | – | ++ | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| S3-P9 | Round, Smooth, Yellowish | Rod | +ve | + | + | + | + | + | – | + | – | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| S4-P11 | Round, Irregular, Wrinkled | Rod | +ve | + | + | ++ | + | + | – | – | – | + | – | + | + | + | + |
| S4-P13 | Moist, Grey, Smooth | Rod | -ve | – | – | + | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – |
| S1-F1 | White, Smooth | Rod | +ve | + | + | – | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S4-F3 | Round, Irregular, Wrinkled | Rod | +ve | + | + | + | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S2-F10 | Irregular, Creamy | Rod | +ve | – | + | ++ | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S2-F11 | Irregular | Rod | +ve | + | + | ++ | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S2-F14 | Slimy, Pink-Red Pigment | Rod | +ve | + | + | ++ | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S2-G2-A1 | Round, Irregular, Wrinkled | Rod | +ve | + | + | ++ | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S3-G10 | Round, Smooth, Yellowish | Rod | +ve | + | + | ++ | + | + | – | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S2-G12 | Creamy White, Mucoid, Raised | Rod | +ve | + | + | ++ | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S2-G13 | Round, Smooth, Yellowish | Rod | +ve | + | + | – | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | + | + | + |
| S1-G15 | Round, Irregular, Wrinkled | Rod | +ve | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
+, Positive; -, negative; In curdling test ++, curd formation with pleasant curd smell; +, curd formation; -, no curdling; Cc, colour change; G, gas production. All the tested bacterial isolates could grow in 5,10,15 and 20% of glucose. All the tested bacterial isolates tolerated upto 30% of sucrose.
Molecular characterization of bacterial isolates obtained from adhirasam dough.
| S. No. | Bacterial isolates | Closest relative | Identity match (%) | NCBI accession number | Sequenced length (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S2-H14 |
| 99.86 | KC851825 | 1481 |
| 2 | S2-H16 |
| 99.93 | KC851826 | 1486 |
| 3 | S4-P4 |
| 99.32 | KC851827 | 1474 |
| 4 | S3-P9 |
| 99.93 | KC851828 | 1489 |
| 5 | S4-P11 |
| 99.93 | KC851829 | 1481 |
| 6 | S4-P13 |
| 99.46 | KC851830 | 1473 |
| 7 | S1-F1 |
| 100 | KC851831 | 1481 |
| 8 | S4-F3 |
| 99.83 | KC851832 | 1478 |
| 9 | S2-F10 |
| 99.86 | KC851833 | 1475 |
| 10 | S2-F11 |
| 100 | KC851834 | 1487 |
| 11 | S2-F14 |
| 99.66 | KC851835 | 1481 |
| 12 | S2-G2-A1 |
| 99.93 | KC851836 | 1477 |
| 13 | S3-G10 |
| 99.93 | KC851837 | 1487 |
| 14 | S2-G12 |
| 99.93 | KC851838 | 1480 |
| 15 | S2-G13 |
| 99.93 | KC851839 | 1480 |
| 16 | S1-G15 |
| 99.93 | KC851840 | 1481 |
Antimicrobial activity of cell free supernatants of Bacillus spp.
| Antagonistic bacteria | Pathogens | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escherchia |
|
|
|
| |
|
| ++ | – | – | – | + |
|
| – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – |
|
| ++ | – | – | – | + |
|
| ++ | – | – | – | + |
|
| ++ | – | – | – | + |
|
| ++ | – | – | – | + |
|
| – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – |
|
| ++ | – | – | – | + |
|
| – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – |
|
| ++ | – | – | – | + |
-, Not detectable; ++ diameter of inhibition zone between 10-15 mm; +, diameter of inhibition zone less than 5 mm.
Figure 1Perforations in adhirasam dough after three days of fermentation; Uninoculated control (a); Dough fermented with inoculation of B. subtilis subsp. subtilis S1-G15 (b).
Organoleptic evaluation of adhirasam dough fermented with different bacterial isolates.
| Treatments | Aroma | Perforations | Color | Texture | Overall acceptability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 8.5 ± 0.53a | 8.4 ± 0.52a | 7.5 ± 0.53a | 8.6 ± 0.52a | 8.2 ± 0.42c |
|
| 8.5 ± 0.53a | 6.6 ± 0.52c | 7.5 ± 0.53a | 7.8 ± 0.42b | 8.8 ± 0.42a |
|
| 8.6 ± 0.52a | 6.7 ± 0.48c | 7.3 ± 0.48a | 8.6 ± 0.52a | 8.8 ± 0.42a |
|
| 8.6 ± 0.52 a | 8.7 ± 0.48a | 7.4 ± 0.52a | 8.7 ± 0.48a | 8.8 ± 0.42a |
|
| 7.6 ± 0.52b | 6.7 ± 0.48c | 7.4 ± 0.52a | 8.5 ± 0.53a | 8.6 ± 0.52a b c |
|
| 8.6 ± 0.52a | 7.6 ± 0.52b | 7.3 ± 0.48a | 8.5 ± 0.53a | 8.4 ± 0.52a b c |
|
| 8.6 ± 0.52a | 7.8 ± 0.42 b | 7.3 ± 0.48a | 8.7 ± 0.48a | 8.4 ± 0.52a b c |
|
| 8.5 ± 0.53a | 6.8 ± 0.42 c | 7.3 ± 0.48a | 8.5 ± 0.53a | 8.4 ± 0.52a b c |
|
| 8.5 ± 0.53a | 6.7 ± 0.48 c | 7.3 ± 0.48a | 8.5 ± 0.53a | 8.3 ± 0.48 b c |
|
| 8.8 ± 0.42a | 8.8 ± 0.42 a | 7.3 ± 0.48a | 8.8 ± 0.42a | 8.8 ± 0.42 a |
|
| 8.8 ± 0.42a | 7.9 ± 0.32 b | 7.3 ± 0.48a | 8.6 ± 0.52a | 8.8 ± 0.42 a |
|
| 8.7 ± 0.48a | 8.6 ± 0.52 a | 7.3 ± 0.48a | 8.4 ± 0.52a | 8.7 ± 0.48a b |
|
| 8.6 ± 0.52a | 6.7 ± 0.48 c | 7.2 ± 0.42a | 8.6 ± 0.52a | 8.8 ± 0.42 a |
|
| 8.8 ± 0.42a | 8.8 ± 0.42 a | 7.4 ± 0.52a | 8.8 ± 0.42a | 8.8 ± 0.42 a |
| LSD (p | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.42 |
Data represents the mean scores (± Standard deviations) of ten judges. Values bearing different superscripts in each column differ significantly (p < 0.05). Naturally fermented dough was used as control (7 Like moderately), score 1, dislike extremely; score 2, dislike very much; score 3, dislike moderately; score 4, dislike slightly; score 5, neither like nor dislike; score 6, like slightly; score 8, like very much; score 9, like extremely.
Figure 2Changes in bacterial population (a) and pH (b) during fermentation of adhirasam dough. Initial pH of dough was 6.0. The treatment details were as follows; T1-B. subtilis subsp. spizizenii S2-H14; T2-B. tequilensis S2-H16; T3-B. tequilensis S3-P9; T4-B. subtilis subsp. subtilis S4-P11; T5Bacillus safensis S1-F1; T6-B. subtilis subsp. inaquosorum S4-F3; T7-B. subtilis subsp. spizizenii S2-F10; T8-Bacillus aerophilus S2-F11; T9-Bacillus endophyticus S2-F14; T10-B. subtilis subsp. subtilis S2-G2-A1; T11-B. tequilensis S3-G10; T12-B. siamensis S2-G12; T13-B. tequilensis S2-G13; T14-B. subtilis subsp. subtilis S1-G15; T15-Control.
Figure 3Adhirasam product prepared from dough fermented with B. subtilis subsp. subtilis S1-G15.
Organoleptic evaluation of adhirasam prepared from fermented dough.
| Treatment | Appearance | Color | Flavor | Texture | Taste | Overall acceptability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 8.1 ± 0.32 e | 8.2 ± 0.42 d | 8.2 ± 0.42 c | 8.2 ± 0.42 c | 8.2 ± 0.42 d | 8.2 ± 0.42 c |
|
| 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab |
|
| 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab |
|
| 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a |
|
| 8.1 ± 0.32e | 8.2 ± 0.42d | 8.2 ± 0.42c | 8.2 ± 0.42c | 8.2 ± 0.42d | 8.2 ± 0.42c |
|
| 8.4 ± 0.52cde | 8.4 ± 0.52cd | 8.5 ± 0.53bc | 8.4 ± 0.52c | 8.7 ± 0.48abc | 8.6 ± 0.52ab |
|
| 8.2 ± 0.42de | 8.2 ± 0.42d | 8.2 ± 0.42c | 8.2 ± 0.42c | 8.2 ± 0.42d | 8.2 ± 0.42c |
|
| 8.6 ± 0.52abc | 8.6 ± 0.52abc | 8.3 ± 0.48c | 8.5 ± 0.53bc | 8.4 ± 0.52cd | 8.5 ± 0.53bc |
|
| 8.4 ± 0.52cde | 8.5 ± 0.53bcd | 8.7 ± 0.48ab | 8.4 ± 0.52c | 8.5 ± 0.53 bcd | 8.5 ± 0.53 bc |
|
| 8.9 ± 0.32a | 8.9 ± 0.32a | 8.9 ± 0.32a | 8.9 ± 0.32a | 8.9 ± 0.32a | 8.9 ± 0.32a |
|
| 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab |
|
| 8.5 ± 0.53bcd | 8.5 ± 0.53bcd | 8.5 ± 0.53bc | 8.5 ± 0.53bc | 8.5 ± 0.53bcd | 8.5 ± 0.53bc |
|
| 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab | 8.8 ± 0.42ab |
|
| 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a | 8.9 ± 0.32 a |
| LSD (p | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
Data represents the mean scores (± standard deviations) of ten judges. Values bearing different superscripts in each column differ significantly (p < 0.05). Naturally fermented dough was used as control (7 Like moderately), score 1, dislike extremely; score 2, dislike very much; score 3, dislike moderately; score 4, dislike slightly; score 5, neither like nor dislike; score 6, like slightly; score 8, like very much; score 9, like extremely.