Literature DB >> 24687088

Phase 2 trial of CPX-351, a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine/daunorubicin, vs cytarabine/daunorubicin in older adults with untreated AML.

Jeffrey E Lancet1, Jorge E Cortes2, Donna E Hogge3, Martin S Tallman4, Tibor J Kovacsovics5, Lloyd E Damon6, Rami Komrokji1, Scott R Solomon7, Jonathan E Kolitz8, Maureen Cooper9, Andrew M Yeager10, Arthur C Louie11, Eric J Feldman12.   

Abstract

CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation of cytarabine:daunorubicin designed to deliver synergistic drug ratios to leukemia cells. In this phase 2 study, newly diagnosed older acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients were randomized 2:1 to first-line CPX-351 or 7+3 treatment. The goal was to determine efficacy and identify patient subgroups that may benefit from CPX-351 treatment. Response rate (complete remission + incomplete remission) was the primary end point, with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary end points. The 126 patients entered were balanced for disease and patient-specific risk factors. Overall, CPX-351 produced higher response rates (66.7% vs 51.2%, P = .07), meeting predefined criteria for success (P < .1). Differences in EFS and OS were not statistically significant. A planned analysis of the secondary AML subgroup demonstrated an improved response rate (57.6% vs 31.6%, P = .06), and prolongation of EFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, P = .08) and OS (HR = 0.46, P = .01). Recovery from cytopenias was slower after CPX-351 (median days to absolute neutrophil count ≥1000: 36 vs 32; platelets >100 000: 37 vs 28) with more grade 3-4 infections but without increase in infection-related deaths (3.5% vs 7.3%) or 60-day mortality (4.7% vs 14.6%), indicating acceptable safety. These results suggest a clinical benefit with CPX-351, particularly among patients with secondary AML, and provide the rationale for a phase 3 trial currently underway in newly diagnosed secondary AML patients. This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00788892.
© 2014 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24687088      PMCID: PMC4624448          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-12-540971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  26 in total

1.  Reasons for treating secondary AML as de novo AML.

Authors:  Lene Sofie Granfeldt Ostgård; Eigil Kjeldsen; Mette Skov Holm; Peter De Nully Brown; Bjarne Bach Pedersen; Knud Bendix; Preben Johansen; Jørgen Schøler Kristensen; Jan Maxwell Nørgaard
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  First-in-man study of CPX-351: a liposomal carrier containing cytarabine and daunorubicin in a fixed 5:1 molar ratio for the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Eric J Feldman; Jeffrey E Lancet; Jonathan E Kolitz; Ellen K Ritchie; Gail J Roboz; Alan F List; Steven L Allen; Ekatherine Asatiani; Lawrence D Mayer; Christine Swenson; Arthur C Louie
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial.

Authors:  D Grimwade; H Walker; G Harrison; F Oliver; S Chatters; C J Harrison; K Wheatley; A K Burnett; A H Goldstone
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Outcomes after induction chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Celeste Bello; Daohai Yu; Rami S Komrokji; Weiwei Zhu; Gene A Wetzstein; Alan F List; Jeffrey E Lancet
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Effect of complete remission and responses less than complete remission on survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a combined Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Southwest Oncology Group, and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Study.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Hagop M Kantarjian; Xuelin Huang; Sherry A Pierce; Zhuoxin Sun; Holly M Gundacker; Farhad Ravandi; Stefan H Faderl; Martin S Tallman; Frederick R Appelbaum; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Leukemia-selective uptake and cytotoxicity of CPX-351, a synergistic fixed-ratio cytarabine:daunorubicin formulation, in bone marrow xenografts.

Authors:  Wah-Seng Lim; Paul G Tardi; Nancy Dos Santos; Xiaowei Xie; Mannie Fan; Barry D Liboiron; Xiaoping Huang; Troy O Harasym; David Bermudes; Lawrence D Mayer
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.156

7.  A phase 3 study of three induction regimens and of priming with GM-CSF in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Jacob M Rowe; Donna Neuberg; William Friedenberg; John M Bennett; Elisabeth Paietta; Adel Z Makary; Jane L Liesveld; Camille N Abboud; Gordon Dewald; F Ann Hayes; Martin S Tallman; Peter H Wiernik
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Pharmacokinetics of CPX-351; a nano-scale liposomal fixed molar ratio formulation of cytarabine:daunorubicin, in patients with advanced leukemia.

Authors:  E J Feldman; J E Kolitz; J M Trang; B D Liboiron; C E Swenson; M T Chiarella; L D Mayer; A C Louie; J E Lancet
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.156

9.  Randomized comparison of double induction and timed-sequential induction to a "3 + 7" induction in adults with AML: long-term analysis of the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) 9000 study.

Authors:  Sylvie Castaigne; Sylvie Chevret; Eric Archimbaud; Pierre Fenaux; Dominique Bordessoule; Hervé Tilly; Thierry de Revel; Marc Simon; Brigitte Dupriez; Michel Renoux; Maud Janvier; Jean-Michel Micléa; Xavier Thomas; Christian Bastard; Claude Preudhomme; Francis Bauters; Laurent Degos; Hervé Dombret
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; John M Bennett; Kenneth J Kopecky; Thomas Büchner; Cheryl L Willman; Elihu H Estey; Charles A Schiffer; Hartmut Doehner; Martin S Tallman; T Andrew Lister; Francesco Lo-Coco; Roel Willemze; Andrea Biondi; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Richard A Larson; Bob Löwenberg; Miguel A Sanz; David R Head; Ryuzo Ohno; Clara D Bloomfield; Francesco LoCocco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  118 in total

1.  The FLAM regimen: revisiting time sequential induction therapy for patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Steven Knapper
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  DNA Origami: Folded DNA-Nanodevices That Can Direct and Interpret Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Cathal J Kearney; Christopher R Lucas; Fergal J O'Brien; Carlos E Castro
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 3.  Treatment of Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Xavier Thomas; Caroline Le Jeune
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-01

Review 4.  Acute myeloid leukemia: advancing clinical trials and promising therapeutics.

Authors:  Naval Daver; Jorge Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.929

Review 5.  Targeting cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment: opportunities and challenges in combinatorial nanomedicine.

Authors:  Samuel S Linton; Samantha G Sherwood; Kelly C Drews; Mark Kester
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 6.  Use of nano engineered approaches to overcome the stromal barrier in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Huan Meng; Andre E Nel
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 7.  Clinical Translation of Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Yuanzeng Min; Joseph M Caster; Michael J Eblan; Andrew Z Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Co-delivery of paclitaxel and cisplatin with biocompatible PLGA-PEG nanoparticles enhances chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer models.

Authors:  Jing Tian; Yuanzeng Min; Zachary Rodgers; Kin Man Au; C Tilden Hagan; Maofan Zhang; Kyle Roche; Feifei Yang; Kyle Wagner; Andrew Z Wang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.331

9.  Using an RNAi Signature Assay To Guide the Design of Three-Drug-Conjugated Nanoparticles with Validated Mechanisms, In Vivo Efficacy, and Low Toxicity.

Authors:  Jonathan C Barnes; Peter M Bruno; Hung V-T Nguyen; Longyan Liao; Jenny Liu; Michael T Hemann; Jeremiah A Johnson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 10.  Update on rational targeted therapy in AML.

Authors:  Danielle Shafer; Steven Grant
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 8.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.